Okay, so you figured majority of community is against this kind of hidden buffs and most likely came to conclusion that they will be inevitably removed since theres absolutely 0 balance / gameplay related reason to keep them.
So to keep your hidden crutch your solution is to “grant” them for everyone.
No thanks chap, off with this hidden sealclub sht.
please see my previous post for the definition of a “whataboutism”
I frankly do not care about historical sources as it is not an information accuracy problem, but a gameplay balance problem, and part of a larger developer bias problem.
Major said we can come back to the topic once it’s been some time
It’s been some time
We are back to the topic
Idk what’s so hard to comprehend. It’s literally there on the Majors post if you were to open your eyes and see instead of trying to lie through your teeth
Stop lie to people! Its a few weeks since you get “No” answer. Let’s say it clear you are bias and you want to cut of a content from game. That’s quite obvoius. But you can’t broke the rules and make the same polls after a 2 weeks, while devs and most of the players at the holydays. Stop lies
You know what, it would’ve made sense if I actually gotten ‘no’ as an answer
But your detective work is off since I’ve gotten ‘yes’ by quite the amount, devs swept it under the rug and now I’ve gotten yes by even larger landslide after they asked to wait an undisclosed amount of time and try again
So I waited as instructed and tried again and here we are - people don’t want body armor in the game plain and simple
There are no rules being broken, I’ve worked with accordance to the CMs instructions, this post being made 31 days after the previous one and over 2 weeks of time since Manchuria update, which is quite the amount to get people accustomed with it
Same thing happened on Enlisted reddit, with the removal being the most common option, despite the poll not even being made by me lmao
Well, guy just want to nerf - despite historical accuracy, despite some nations got their buffs - like Japanese singuto in a tech tree. He don’t care - he wants. That’s all
Thanks so much, you didn’t make a poll after closing a previous and wait for a few weeks, but rules tells - no the same polls - after a day, a week, a month.
not really, more like a fix. Just like with PPSh box which you also conveniently were against of.
As none cosmetic should affect the gameplay.
How ever, only the bodyarmor currently does affect gameplay drastically.
Show us the documents of the body armour working against anything above 9mm rounds.
Show us documents that the body armour protects areas that it doesn’t cover.
Current flat 10% damage reduction has the body armour protecting soldiers from full on rifle fire, flames for some reason too, and many many more stupid things. Not only that, the 10% damage reduction applies across the whole body, which is also ridiculous.
It’s not acting in a realistic manner, so do not hide behind this excuse.
I will be the first guy to write a suggestion for Soviet unique, universally available, and realisticly acting body-armour (with appropriate bonuses and drawback), equipable as a backpack slot item, once the hidden buff on the cosmetics are removed.
Cosmetics should not apply effects upon gameplay, if you want body armour with effects then those effects should be realistic, not a universaly applicable upgrade, it should be a situational item, which takes up a slot on the soldier just like all the rest of the gear in game.
What the fk ?? THAT is outrageous, how dare they make it ohk against vitality ?
Now im not going to get any sleep tonight knowing such outrageous nerf.