AT grenade addition for each nation

Would you like something like this or feel like it’s wasted resources? Please share your thoughts below.

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Currently each faction has their anti tank grenade being a bundled pack of dynamite, generic but plausible… this could be improved however and creating further immersion by giving each nation a dedicated design for their explosive pack or adding a new one as these involve impact type AT.

These could have a higher BR considering the increased penetration and OR restricting them to AT which would make more sense … i’m understanding some people already don’t like every soldier having AT but spawning tanks is no different than infantry other than it taking a slot.

USSR: RPG 43 - BR 3-4

An impact fixed AT grenade developed late into the war capable of penetrating 70mm of armor

The other option being the RPG 40 developed early war with only 25mm of pen… which could be cool (pictured third)

Also pictured in the second is the RPG 6 but with 100mm of pen which also could be interesting for BRV

IMG_1832
IMG_1833

UK: No. 74 Sticky Grenade - BR1

British sticky anti tank grenade known commonly as the “sticky bomb”

Fuse time of 4 seconds capable of penetrating the armor of light tanks around 25mm, justifying its lower BR being able to pick on the light italian tanks.

IMG_1836
IMG_1837

Italy: Breda Mod. 42 - BR1

Italian anti tank impact grenade, capable of penetrating just 20mm of armor… effective on light tanks and top down attacks on larger tanks encouraging ambushes

image
IMG_1838

Germany: Hafthohlladung - BRV

Magnetically adhered shaped charge capable of penetrating 140mm of armor with a fuse time of 4.5 seconds… due to its magnetic attribute it would function as a TNT charge but could take grenade slot or just as fine in mine.



Japan: Type 3 HEAT grenade - BR3

Impact fuse anti tank grenade capable of penetrating 70mm of armor… effective against the usual sherman.

IMG_1846
IMG_1847

Overall i feel like this could spice up the AT game instead of the usual explosion pack or AT and give some unique options for higher BR.

You may have noticed i didn’t include the US and that’s because i don’t think they had a dedicated one and theirs being dynamite bundled seems reasonable

11 Likes

Issuing anti-tank grenades was reasonable; in reality, they were the primary individual anti-tank weapon for Soviet infantry. It would have been interesting to see RPG-43s universally distributed to Soviet infantry of all weights.

extremely useful for early war campaigns in/on mods.

and in enlisted, pretty much everywhere.

I dont think that would be necessary, its already rather notable trade-off to either take AT grenade or grenades / detpack.
Considering the detpack is somewhat universal do-it-all tool.

2 Likes

Agree with most of this, but I don’t really think they should be tied to BRs. For example, the Ni05 AT mine doesn’t have a BR and is avaliable for every soldier as it should be, and I’d wager it’s better than the Hafthohlladung would be, since it has 10mms more penetration and you can run with it.

2 Likes