I apologize in advance for the slightly distorted image, but it’s much better than trying to explain everything verbally.
2 Likes
This unit was sold in the Stalingrad campaign in the game “Enlisted”. As for the history, I recommend that you study it in more detail, as I don’t like to talk about such things, although I can
1 Like
Additional information that I forgot to mention earlier in this sentence. In the game “Enlisted”, the German and Finnish (sub-factions) (Both factions will play on the same team) can be in the same battle, but only on certain maps that have been mentioned above.
I’m really not a big fan of copy and pasting equipment into other tech trees, tech trees should be for unique domestically produced weapons.
This is the highlight of subfractions. They can have some of their weapons, and some of the ones copied earlier, which will give players a new experience, a new gaming experience, as well as solve many problems. Besides, without such an addition, the idea of a subfraction cannot be realized. In addition, if the player does not want to pump the same weapons, he can safely stay on the main faction without touching the sub-faction. So I don’t see any problems.
2 Likes
Cool story bro.
Tell us about Finnish divisions at Stalingrad.
1 Like
You can read it, I assume this site can be trusted (I apologize in advance for the link to the Russian-language site on the English Enlisted game forum)
What is this doing here? There are no records of BAR being used by Finland. It should be replaced with the DP-27 as it was extremely common and well liked by Finnish troops
Also you should add some Finnish mosins instead of Kar 98ks and Carcanos. Kar 98ks saw no widespread use and Carcanos were used exclusively by Anti aircraft crews. You should at least add M27, M28, M28-30 and M39 mosin.
I would also replace Fn m1930 and Madsen with Swedish KG M21 lmg
Opel Blitz should be replaced with a more common ford truck
For planes i would also add Brewster Buffalo, Morane Saulnier, Bf 109 and Hawker Hurricane maybe as premium
Along with SVT we should get Lahti-l36
For smgs Suomi-Korsu with stick mag would be interesting
Anyways i voted no since new factions/subfactions take lot of effort and we still haven’t even gotten proper British or Italian subfactions. We should prioritize fixing existing content before adding anything new
7 Likes
No mention of Finnish divisions at Stalingrad there.
If you wanna count ** volunteers, ** Rona and ** Cossacks should be fighting at Ardennes or attacking Rzhev too?
That is not a Finnish division. Those are german Jägers that are just using Finnish guns. Just like Orita m1941 squad that is not actually Romanian. Finnish troops never fought in Stalingrad, Rzhev or Moscow. You must be confusing these battles with siege of Leningrad where Finnish forces were present
2 Likes
Yes, I must have mixed up the geography a little. I’m sorry
1 Like
Where was this mentioned? The wiki only said that Finnish soldier prefered AVS-36 with 15 round mag but nothing about Lahti l36 with 15 rounds. Also i agree that 5 round lahti would fit br 2 the best while svt-38 can stay in br 3
2 Likes
The online translator translated it incorrectly, I apologize
1 Like
https://jaegerplatoon.net/LMG2.htm
I’ll add a new message. Apparently I confused the M1918a2 with the FN Model D
Stack BOBKA is here
I think that the main issue here is that nearly 70% of the proposed tech tree is copy paste from other factions.
If we are realistic here, which we should be. Than Finland can only be a subfaction at best.
Finland even as a subfaction would take a lot of work.
First we would need at least one campaign in which Finnish soldiers historically fought in, than the voice lines and customization, all these are expensive and time consuming.
Meanwhile there are existing subfaction like France and potential subfactions that already have a campaign like Hungary or Siam should take priority.
These subfactions should get priority since they would also justify adding more weapons and vehicles to the game.
So ultimately, no matter how cool Finland would be, its just not a priority right now.
1 Like
very legit site.
I especiatly like how finnish civil war is sort of highlighted on that part that there indeed was “white” civils fighting in karelia aka russia.
But conveniently the reason for such, the bolsheviks part in finnish civil war, arming the reds, bolshevik soldiers taking part in civil war is entirely forgotten.
But it seems like a legit mistake that it was conveniently forgotten.
The Finns have a good variety of infantry weapons; it would be difficult in the case of automatic and semi-automatic rifles, but there are options. Vehicles would be a whole other issue; at most, they’d have tanks that are suitable for BR4 and aren’t copies. What could be a problem is that many players probably won’t like certain weapon options without them being nerfed.
It’s not that I don’t wanna use different weapons, I just thinks it’s lazy and works against immersion for me to be playing as the Soviets and fighting against Germans using SVTs or BARs. I think the issue becomes especially prevalent when the copy and paste is the best option a faction gets, like the Ofenrohrs for the US and Japan or the M1 Bazooka for the Soviets at BR2.
There are enough domestic designs to make work sub-trees or full on tech trees for a few nations. Copy and pastes aren’t necessary in TTS, they should be reserved for events, premiums, and BP weapons.