Win ratio have nothing to do with how many br4 there are.
No. What i’m trying to say is that the high win ratio on USSR and USA is just a byproduct of BR 3 win ratio, not the actual win ratio of BR 4 itself. Because you can clear see that the BR 4 win ratio on every faction basically follows the same pattern as their BR 3 win ratio rather than their BR 5. This means that in my opinion, BR 4 itself isn’t significant enough(Of course it isn’t)to influence BR 3 due to the fact that people rarely plays the BR 4 as itself and the BR 4 can do absolutely nothing against BR 5. I think the BR 4 is truly fu**ed BR.
What is this then? You literally said I never played BR1-4.
Lol I post it because you said my bot lobby worry is an excuse so I can farm br4 players as br5 player. But how can it be true if I already said something similar before merge?
Wow, I pick my topic that is related to concern of bot lobby, of course it is no. If there is several topic suggesting keeping ±1 br will you say yes?
You said no on those topic can I also call you contribute to nothing?
How is my public stats have anything to do with not enough players problem in the first place?
You are just diverging the topic to a personal stat discussion.
Because you are acting like bot lobby is not a problem. Back in the day bot lobby is a bad problem, and it was finally solve after the merge. Of course I need to verify if you know how bad the situation is back then.
I’ll leave it here. You’ve spent the last several posts litigating word choice, digging through archives, and relitigating the merge
but you still haven’t answered the one question that why has a one-month ±0 test never been tried?**
If bot lobbies are as catastrophic as you say, the test would prove it. If they’re not, it would prove that too.
Until u can answer that, there’s nothing left to debate. Not wasting any more time on your trolling, sarcasm, and old grudges.
This loop is pointless. I’m done here.
I am not a dev how should I know about it?
It is funny that you just ignore all of the previous discussion and use a point that you didn’t even include this on your original topic.
Try better next time I guess, most of the stuff you discuss is about personal behavior instead of the topic itself. And stop faking claim when doing suggestion, this suggestion is base on the claim that Chinese server do well, but it is not.
numbers are pretty accurate for regular MM and it is not that hard to get daily numbers. also daily/weekly/monthly unique players are not relevant numbers for MM cause 1 player playing 1 battle in 1 month doesnt do anything for MM. concurrent player number is what is relevant and you can see number for last year and year before last here:
actually not true if playerbase is not enough to support it. i would guess you are relatively new player that hadnt played campaigns, so you didnt experience what is one sided beatdown when one side has more human players than the other.
check allies to axis ratio or axis to allies ratio on certain campaigns in 2023 and you will see which campaigns sucked for underdog side. even normandy which had 1:1 ratio had its moments where it was severely unbalanced cause of TT update or some event reward.
we had that test for first 2 years of the game. solution to that was merge and current MM.
1 Like
I played back before the '22 merge, then heard about the big rework and came back to check it out. Didn’t really get back into it regularly until 2023/24.
merge was in december 2023…
Right, I meant I only became a regular player in early 2024.In 2022 I just played for a short while.
@Axismodeus This is the reason why I ask you if you were here at that time. Player that played during that time actually know and experienced the problem that I concern about. Now you know why I say no to those previous post in 2022/2023, the game simply can’t afford that.
1 Like
I remember campaigns, I mostly played Battle of Stalingrad and a bit of Normandy
I cant agree - The uptiers need to stay, but reworked
The enlistedrollcall.com isnt a trusted site to check it - For now
Why? Cause we dont have any information about source of data.
These informations are not even full at all:
My profile
EnlistedRollCall:
If data isnt full that means we cant trust it.
Also I want a data source of Chinese playerbase, I find it quite opposite for my experience.
Alright, by that I want to present why I think its a bad idea.
- The balance stuff
-The enlisted for last years have problem with balance a event stuff and the tech tree - the XA-38, kugelblitz, kv2
Yes I exampled only the Br3 why? My reason lies that on every BR we got to many broken stuff due to extreme compression in five battleratings. So try to imagine - close this BR ±0 now and u got a massacre on early tech tree br3 players. The original suggestion is not a long term solution at all.
The same will happen on higher tiers. The problem isnt only between BR4 and BR5 (The BR3 is just on damage control right now by battlerating system ±1)
Thats why I think taking out entire system is wrong. It need to be overhauled.
My suggestion - Add one or two buffer br’s with transitional weapons
A perfect of this example in game of these type of weapons are BRII semi-auto’s:
We just need this type of weapons on new battlerating between BR4 and BR5.
So going with that we can do the same stuff between BR3 and BR4 to balance XA-38 etc…
- PlayerBase isnt that huge as it shows
-Im a RU server player and Im playing late night hours due of my school life. - and its not rare for me to wait for 5 minutes or longer for one match.
If we close BR’s it will hurt me, thats all - ITS PERSONAL thats all.
I believe Rollcall gets their data directly from the replays site
yet people use it as if it’s the gospel 
fun fact. i don’t even appear there for some reason.
so it just doesn’t work.
but even if it would, i doubt the stats would track 6 years of playing this game.
which is worth to mention that the stats were only ever so recorded after the merge and wiped twice.
Maybe you were playing in incognito?
i don’t recall ever using that feature
Strange, it’s probably some bug or something because I can see mine there
here is the source
https://enlisted.net/en/replays/#!/
site started collecting data from june of this year.
do you even play regular MM? he is probably using only regular MM replays.
Mmmm, yeah he did confirm that he uses only data from like normal matchmaking
