Fair point on the data
enlistedrollcall only covers a few months, so it doesn’t tell me what you played years ago. ——but I said “your last 242 games,” not “your whole history.” those last 242 games are still you, right now: 99% in BR5, zero in BR4. So when you tell BR4 players to “just choose not to play,” you’re describing a choice you personally make every single day.
And you actually made my point for me again 
A veteran can go to BR3 and farm clueless newbies." You just admitted the clubber exists — yojust insist he’s in BR3, not BR4. Whether the punching bag is BR3 or BR4, the matchmaking is what enables it. The exact BR doesn’t change the principle.
I’m not here to measure seniority and let’s be clear about what’s actually happening here
You’ve posted a handful of old threads to prove… what, exactly? Seniority? Let me read them back to you. Every single one is you arguing against something: against new campaigns, against a realistic mode, against anything that might split the queue. And he same argument every single time: “it will split the playerbase.”
Those old posts don’t actually support your current argument. What they reveal is a consistent pattern running through your entire history
You’ve opposed change in every single one of them. You opposed new campaigns. You opposed the realistic mode. You opposed anything that might split up the matchmaking queue. You were against it before the merge, and now you’re against ±0 too. Other than saying “no,” you’ve contributed basically nothing of value to anything.
So thanks to those old posts you made just to flex your seniority, I think everyone here can now see your behavior pattern: it doesn’t actually matter to you what the proposal is. You just always answer “no,” and the reason is always exactly the same.
And now here you are again, going against the crowd, deliberately dodging my points with all kinds of clumsy, reflex-defense nonsense — all while hiding behind that “veteran” badge. You never actually engaged with the substance of my matchmaking argument. You just pulled out that same “splitting the player base” card you’ve been playing since 2022.
Honestly, You can’t even stick to arguing the actual points.this is a complete failure of basic debate etiquette.
Now let’s talk about your behavior. You called me out for “personal attacks” just because I read your public stats. Those are just publicly available server data ——i think anyone has the right to look them up. If you won’t even allow that kind of criticism, then what you’re actually doing is textbook bad-faith debating.
You dig up irrelevantpld posts to establish your seniority, then ask “where were you back then?” — as if playing longer somehow makes a flimsy argument hold up. Now you’ve set up this gatekeeping rule where people have to have more forum history than you before they’re “qualified” to answer. Why do you keep dodging my actual proposal to ramble about all this irrelevant stuff?
If your concern about “splitting the player base” really had the basis you claim, I don’t think it would even take several months — just one month of test data would prove you right, and it would settle this debate for free. Yu’d win, with evidence, at zero cost.**
So why has this never happened? Unless you already know what the result would be — or you don’t actually want the answer,there’s no reason to refuse running the experiment.
This loop is pointless. I’m done here.