“we’re not satisfied with having the strongest rifle, sniper rifle, assault rifle, AT weapon, tank and fighter plane in the game, we also need to have the strongest MG”
One thing is for sure the belt feds should DEFINITELY NOT be premium or event weapons. You can’t do that to the standard MGs of the Germans
Question is should the belt be a variant weapon or an option like bayonets. Now that I think about it they’d probably make it a variant seeing as we have the MG 34 75
AVT-40 is stronger, AVS-36 is better, Fedorov is way stronger, Soviets also have Panzerfaust 100 and it’s better than Ofenhohr that has less pen and kills me every time i try to shoot through the window, is-2 can destroy anything, Soviet P-40E is great you don’t need anything better. Soviets are most op nation in a game and that’s objective truth. They are only missing impact nades and paras that they will get within 4 days. So giving us just a single strong MG is nothing if soviets arsenal is already way too op and should be nerfed.
What i find hilarious is that the Patronentrommel IS the realistic MG ammo count for mobile german MGs lmao. And even then those were rare and impractical
Also, for the love of god, almost all german MGs are belt fed already. The 34, 42, 15
FG42 II has way less recoil, more ammo and a faster ROF. AVT-40 is stronger because it has 0,7 extra damage?
Again, the FG sniper variant has more ammo and less recoil
Maybe at close range with its damage, but the StG44 is way more controllable
So can the king tiger, while having a way faster reload and more armor. We’re talking about which nation has the best gear, and the king tiger is objectively better than the IS-2
Again, we’re discussing who has the best stuff. The Fw 190 D-12 is better and the best fighter in the game.
I don’t care as long as he can cover our ass and hold the enemies off or if he dies I’ll take it off his corpse And if we’re going into the premium department I expect a 250 round belt fed MG