Yet another historical accuracy topic

[ErikaKalkbrenner]

no. don’t give in because of repetition.

that’s lame.

anyway, i’ll deal with you later @TUSUPOLISI69 . gotta go for a bit.

[gastanofrizzi]

@ErikaKalkbrenner

yes you do

Dev keep sell prototype and veichle at a fast pace this mean they get a lot of money from them and dont even need make some discount or lower the price

For me imo the main enlisted source of money are them

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@ErikaKalkbrenner

are you new on the forum?

you have no idea the ammount of threads regarding the matter.

Just because few asshats spam same shit all over again doesnt really mean its something thousands are intrested of.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

which no, they did not do it willingly. they simply left. i’m sure there will be a place for esporters as well at this point ( to my… regreats ) matter of fact, as WT does, i don’t see why enlisted shouldn’t.

yeah, they are different games, but not that much. so…

since devs are doing one step to the historical accuracy why not conclude it once and for all to put it in place without having to thinking it twice.

And yet again you fail to explain how come theres not a single historical accurated custom lobby.
If there was such a large community behind it im quite confident there would be atleast 1.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

i mean, not really.

nobody really asked for stupid equipment to be putted in place where it shouldn’t have beloged.

they just pushed boundaries and allowed their selfs to continue.

it’s totally a differnt story pal.

I suppose you have data that they chose the wrong path and are doing less money now than they did before ?

@ErikaKalkbrenner

you don’t have to believe me. but believe the market.

:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd

This shit again, its there biliv me I just dont have anything to prove it but its there biliv me.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

sure, it is of niche. but since enlisted has larpers of arcadery i don’t see what hamrs would do.

Which also are nowhere to be seen.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

actually, the opposite would happen. people would love to buy for cosmetics and what not as long it’s historically related. so… more incomes.

Aaand again plis biliv me, I have no actual prove but plis biliv me.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

but you do you.
keep believing your own bullshits.

Aand the irony.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

looks like they have just proven you wrong.

my dear.

because making custom games historicall accurate is one of the many steps. though, could have been made slighlty better by adding an entire MM.

So wipe off your tears, if the custom games eventually work and will bring the thousands of players you claim to be there Im sure they will make it to MM.

But currently you have provided nothing.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

ugh… custom matches and the mods limitation?

du h ?

So your saying custom games prevents you from using historical accurated equipment ?

@ErikaKalkbrenner

funny. i can guarantee you that 70% of my suggestions have become a thing.

granted, i don’t take all the " glory " to it. but sure. keep talking nonsense.

Well wipe off your tears then surely this maginificent larpping shit will become a thing then too.
Just because ur special.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

no.

just merely a player that at least tried to do something with the tools avaialble to prove her point.

Cool for you.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

which, you just sits on your ass believe that custom games are wonders when in reality are not.

And yet again you fail to explain how exactly custom games prevents you to use from historical accurated equipment.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

that’s why we differ friendo.

Yeah trustmebro.

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@VoyoMayPL

Based on trust me bro as I understand?

Im quite sure the burden of prove belongs to one whos asking for something.
In this case historical MM, yet only thing that has been brought is a comment from another thread and top of that irrelevant to subject as it clearly was related to arcade side of the game.

Trustmebro histori larp is thing.

[ISANMAA1946]

@ErikaKalkbrenner

since devs are doing one step to the historical accuracy

… like what? A step to proper historical accuracy as in what? T-50, Fedorov Automats, the fucking bots, the size of the maps, the setting, the sounds, the amount of players in each battle, recoil patterns, damage, gameplay, even the molotovs, expacks, radios, building PAK’s with hammers, AA-guns in general:
unhistorical and unrealistic and scream arcade bot-farming mow-town for people of all skill-levels.

Enlisted is attractive to “h1st0ricAl ACcUraCy fans” because of bots, which give the sense of accomplishment to players of all skill-levels.

EDIT: erhm, of some skill levels. Not all. Some skill levels.

[Lisqs]

I kinda hope that PVE is about to come and it was represented on one of those ruined spots on roadmap

[VoyoMayPL]

@gastanofrizzi

dont even need make some discount or lower the price

Actually f2p games make the most monney not from seling things to mases of people but from whales.
So devs went full on this with selling whales some expensive stuff to make more monney.

[VoyoMayPL]

@TUSUPOLISI69

yet only thing that has been brought is a comment from another thread

Fortunatelly you brought trust me bro that is clearly superior.

@TUSUPOLISI69

it clearly was related to arcade side of the game.

So his comment is related to “arcade side of the game”.But all of arcade ppl don’t want history.
So this doesn’t make sense. Why people who don’t want history like a comment about history?

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@VoyoMayPL

Fortunatelly you brought trust me bro that is clearly superior.

Well there aint a single custom historical accuracy lobby ami right ?
Estimated daily playerbase is rather high according to that website I provided.
Even if it was just 10% of that estimation the ppl asking for this is absolutely irrelevant niche.

@VoyoMayPL

So his comment is related to “arcade side of the game”.But all of arcade ppl don’t want history.

@Ratta_01

no please god… don’t sacrifice accuracy for matchmaking purposes… don’t kil he game, stay stick witwhaou promised, accuracy must remain a priority

“Dont sacrifice accuracy for matchmaking”

First of all the histori larp isnt in matchmake so its rather clear hes not speaking of custom lobbies were this “histori larp” could be a thing.

@VoyoMayPL

So this doesn’t make sense. Why people who don’t want history like a comment about history?

Theres a differency of not wanting IS2 roam in moscow and with histori larpping of BA action against bots.

[VoyoMayPL]

@TUSUPOLISI69

Well there aint a single custom historical accuracy lobby ami right ?

Because ather are next to no tools to make one smoothbrain.
This was said like 5 times already.

And no Keo saying there will be some doesn’t count. He promised a lot of things that didn’t happen.

@TUSUPOLISI69

Theres a differency of not wanting IS2 roam in moscow and with histori larpping of BA action against bots.

Except from what I understand, we will have IS2 in moscow. (Maybe we won’t due to the “vocal minority of idiots bitching on the forum” as a group of people seem to think.)
And if I don’t want this, I have to play customs.

[VoyoMayPL]

Let me describe my idea once again because I feel we mussunderstand eachother.

I want 2 mm:

• arcade - IS2 in moscow
• historical - no IS2 in moscow

plus

• CLs - for diehard history buffs that want to reenact

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@VoyoMayPL

Because ather are next to no tools to make one smoothbrain.
This was said like 5 times already.

and yet not a single person havent explained how custom lobbies prevents people from using historically accurated equipment WHICH they could use even in regulard arcade mode if they wish.

@VoyoMayPL

And no Keo saying there will be some doesn’t count. He promised a lot of things that didn’t happen.

Why even ask then.

@VoyoMayPL

Except from what I understand, we will have IS2 in moscow. (Maybe we won’t due to the “vocal minority of idiots bitching on the forum” as a group of people seem to think.)

Exactly. It is entirely different subject of not wanting IS2 in moscow than asking for BA histori larpping.

[VoyoMayPL]

@TUSUPOLISI69

It is entirely different subject of not wanting IS2 in moscow than asking for BA histori larpping.

Edited OP and

Yet another historical accuracy topic

Let me describe my idea once again because I feel we mussunderstand eachother. I want 2 mm: arcade - IS2 in moscow historical - no IS2 in moscow plus CLs - for diehard history buffs that want to reenact

Do you have questions?

[VoyoMayPL]

(When TF did we reach 113 comments?)

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@VoyoMayPL

Do you have questions?

So you want to have the current game we have as separate matchmake ?

[VoyoMayPL]

• new progresion
• maybe new ranking MM
• old (prefferably improved) equipment + map matchups.

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@VoyoMayPL

• new progresion

Ok.

@VoyoMayPL

• maybe new ranking MM

Ok

@VoyoMayPL

• old (prefferably improved) equipment + map matchups.

So this exact game we have as separate matchmake or the alot spoken histori larp larp ?

[redStick]

Here’s an example of achieving HA without campaign MM queues:

[VoyoMayPL]

@TUSUPOLISI69

So this exact game we have as separate matchmake or the alot spoken histori larp larp ?

So you can’t have IS2 in moscow.

At least in the early days you still will be able to run 3 assaulter squads n shit.
Maybe this will change in the future but for now just map + equipment thing.

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@VoyoMayPL

So you can’t have IS2 in moscow.

Okay so this exact setting we have now ?