I kinda hope that PVE is about to come and it was represented on one of those ruined spots on roadmap 
1 Like
Actually f2p games make the most monney not from seling things to mases of people but from whales.
So devs went full on this with selling whales some expensive stuff to make more monney.
Fortunatelly you brought trust me bro that is clearly superior.
So his comment is related to “arcade side of the game”.But all of arcade ppl don’t want history.
So this doesn’t make sense. Why people who don’t want history like a comment about history?
2 Likes
Well there aint a single custom historical accuracy lobby ami right ?
Estimated daily playerbase is rather high according to that website I provided.
Even if it was just 10% of that estimation the ppl asking for this is absolutely irrelevant niche.
“Dont sacrifice accuracy for matchmaking”
First of all the histori larp isnt in matchmake so its rather clear hes not speaking of custom lobbies were this “histori larp” could be a thing.
Theres a differency of not wanting IS2 roam in moscow and with histori larpping of BA action against bots.
Because ather are next to no tools to make one smoothbrain.
This was said like 5 times already.
And no Keo saying there will be some doesn’t count. He promised a lot of things that didn’t happen.
Except from what I understand, we will have IS2 in moscow. (Maybe we won’t due to the “vocal minority of idiots bitching on the forum” as a group of people seem to think.)
And if I don’t want this, I have to play customs.
1 Like
Let me describe my idea once again because I feel we mussunderstand eachother.
I want 2 mm:
- arcade - IS2 in moscow
- historical - no IS2 in moscow
plus
- CLs - for diehard history buffs that want to reenact
2 Likes
and yet not a single person havent explained how custom lobbies prevents people from using historically accurated equipment WHICH they could use even in regulard arcade mode if they wish.
Why even ask then.
Exactly. It is entirely different subject of not wanting IS2 in moscow than asking for BA histori larpping.
Edited OP and
Do you have questions?
(When TF did we reach 113 comments?)
1 Like
So you want to have the current game we have as separate matchmake ?
- new progresion
- maybe new ranking MM
- old (prefferably improved) equipment + map matchups.
Ok.
Ok
So this exact game we have as separate matchmake or the alot spoken histori larp larp ?
So you can’t have IS2 in moscow.
At least in the early days you still will be able to run 3 assaulter squads n shit.
Maybe this will change in the future but for now just map + equipment thing.
Okay so this exact setting we have now ?
Not exact. For exaple now we have jumbo in normandy, stg in moscow etc.
This would be gone.
it sounds good at first glance, but there are problems.
- it would be totally random campaign MM (people will cry cause of that)
- you wouldnt get equipment/vehicle balance (you would keep lot of problems from current campaigns like stuart vs tiger situation or pz2 vs t34)
i could probably find few more problems in it, but just 2nd is enough for me to say it is a bad idea.
So basicly same arcade game with limiting certain equipment, which partially are in there for balance purposes ?
Yes.
Since there will be equipment MM, the equipment ballance should be ok if it works correctly (that’s up to devs, not me).
1 Like
so much that they actually decided to make it a thing in custom games.
sure bud.
now, the problem with that, are the custom games system as a whole which it’s barely function. hence why it would be better and faster to straight up make into an MM.
doesn’t concern you, won’t change that much for you hun.
no. the only one who failed here is you by understanding the current limitations and issues provided from the editor.
making money is truly questionable.
i don’t really see alot of people using half of the premium squads so…
yeah, without data or anything, i can have somewhat of a wild accurate guess.
suprises me that you can’t get it.
i mean, HLL post scriptum, beyond the wire and similar titles were sucessfull for a bit, but because of lack of updates and modding, ( things that enlisted somewhat has ) would make enlisted a good sucessor. perhaps an actual competitor with stable features and basically a place for everyone.
yeah, actually you are right.
someone so blind like you i’m not sure would be able to see anything at all.
except, u numb don’t have to believe me and actually look for the forum. you know, you have a tool that you could/should use.
yet you refuse.
i’m just gonna say that everyoen ( even in the alpha ) wanted historical camouflages, historical squads etc.
so they do make earn some money.
even the current Bp vehicles are somewhat loved as long accurate.
so… yeah. believe what you want, it still won’t change a damn thing.
well, yes.
once again and for the last time, having an actual MM would bring more players as it would be easier to access, bring xps ( instead of the half baked custom games which not everyone does even know how to access it. you included ) and less work for everybody.
but i presume you are gonna turn fat blind eyes again.
i’m used to it by now.
yes
i’m starting to believe you’re projecting. are you sure aren’t you the one tears?
u ok bud?
anyway, no. as much as i’m gonna be greateful for at least some sort of limitator on equipment, i’m less greatefull that it’s being integrated for something that wasn’t originally designed nor really work exceptionally very well to it.
hence why a stable MM IS better no matter what you are bitching about.
you failed to read carefully looks like.
no. matter of fact i barely trust anything you say.
2 Likes