Yet another historical accuracy topic

yeah, i can get behind that. though, i don’t see again why there can’t be a place for those people.

custom games are more troubles than worthed. that’s the main issue. hence would be good like WT a third… thing.

but we’ll see.

don’t just jump in a conversation with no reason without reading the rest.

because i did addressed that part already.

1 Like

b - b u h

C U S T O MS !

( some people in this forum… i s wear… )

image

I supposed you was more smart, turpiloquio here is well knowed for want have always the last word in every conversation, accept my suggestion and drop it because is a wall wo is talking with another wall

All the features of custom lobbies in one picture:
desert-dryland

2 Likes

most people just paraphrase what keo said. iirc he said that historical battles are going to have a place in customs.

Oh the irony

Its not like its first time in history when players who wants X all obey the rules.
There was no competive mod in ET for long time and ppl who wanted to play according to competive rules did so regardless there was no MOD to force them to use certain equipment, they did it willingly.

Are you implying your thousands of friends are too stupid to do so ? Or is it just the fact that there really isnt more than you and few others who care for this larpping ?

Yeah perhaps that just didnt work out, stupid companies doing what brings them money.

Ahhh, plis biliv me there is millions players want my histori larp accurate. Plis biliv me.

Unfortunately theres just 1 team working on the game, no separate team working on silly ass histori accurate mode.
So sucks to be you, priorities are priorities.

And they are what ? What stops you and your thousands of friends using historically accurated equipment in password protected lobbies ? Nothing.

Yeah trustmebro arguments. Absolutely fantastic reasoning.
Wonder why they dont take your suggestions seriously.

Is this one of those “im modder I made sandbox model in modding tool so im professional” arguments ?

Also

Making the main game more historical will use less recources than developing many required features to make CLs historical.
image

1 Like

i will stand my ground.

1 Like

Then on of you two is destined to fall at the end of the day

I still wait for nation specyfic AAA and bipod fix he promised like 1-2y ago.

So yeah, you get the point.

1 Like

yes, but the point is,

it’s much more covinient to actually make it into a MM.

because custom games have lots of issues. and generally, people don’t even know how to access those.

like, that’s why it would be alot easier and convinient for everyone to simply make it a selection option rather than having to access different tabs. customs i would leave them for mods.

1 Like

The problem with this is it dont make money as f2p, currently the massive releasing of prototype and veichle is what is making money because they are something interesting to get and use

1 Like

Finally! Somebody with a solid argument!

And I’m affraid you are right.
But still, 2 mm won’t hurt.

2 Likes

yes it will use less resources, but it is unsustainable. if they want to keep game historical they just need to keep horizontal campaigns grind, but with every campaign added you are killing the game.
and if they want to keep it in new system, there are simply too many weapon combinations that could be made for them to be specific to single campaign and then you need to have separate queues for them. just this year they will add 2 new campaigns and then you will need to have 8 separate campaign queues (without equipment based MM).

people who want historical accuracy just simply dont understand that for MM to work it needs huge population at any given time. it worked at beginning cause they had low campaign number, but now it wont work cause they are adding different campaigns. if you want game to be moscow simulator then game can keep historical accuracy and have one queue.

definitely not. Question was is it worth the effort.
And currently it seems its not.

no iron. only steel.

are you new on the forum?

you have no idea the ammount of threads regarding the matter.

so please.
DO
NOT
SPEAK
IF
YOU
DON’T
KNOW
SHIT
ABOUT
THE
ARGUMENT

honestly. no harsh feeling though.

which no, they did not do it willingly. they simply left. i’m sure there will be a place for esporters as well at this point ( to my… regreats ) matter of fact, as WT does, i don’t see why enlisted shouldn’t.

yeah, they are different games, but not that much. so…

since devs are doing one step to the historical accuracy why not conclude it once and for all to put it in place without having to thinking it twice.

i mean, not really.

nobody really asked for stupid equipment to be putted in place where it shouldn’t have beloged.

they just pushed boundaries and allowed their selfs to continue.

it’s totally a differnt story pal.

you don’t have to believe me. but believe the market.

sure, it is of niche. but since enlisted has larpers of arcadery i don’t see what hamrs would do.

actually, the opposite would happen. people would love to buy for cosmetics and what not as long it’s historically related. so… more incomes.

but you do you.
keep believing your own bullshits.

looks like they have just proven you wrong.

my dear.

because making custom games historicall accurate is one of the many steps. though, could have been made slighlty better by adding an entire MM.

ugh… custom matches and the mods limitation?

du h ?

funny. i can guarantee you that 70% of my suggestions have become a thing.

granted, i don’t take all the " glory " to it. but sure. keep talking nonsense.

no.

just merely a player that at least tried to do something with the tools avaialble to prove her point.

which, you just sits on your ass believe that custom games are wonders when in reality are not.

that’s why we differ friendo.

1 Like

no?
there are at least 3 ideas on the forum that make tge ech trees work

Based on trust me bro as I understand?

1 Like

yes you do.

you still get money from them as they still need xps, vehicles, customization, skip tiers etc.

so… can we scratch the idea that historical accuracy is a bare minimum thing on it’s own?

because it is not.

( i mean, it is when it comes to actually make it with restriction and stuff. but historical accurate players are still gonna need to progress and get stuff. so it’s not all given. they theorically have less to unlock and stuff, but the result is the same )

and people are gonna spend money for the effort of making things right.

2 Likes

people want historical accuracy. you cant make historical accuracy without separate queues. simple as that. there is always some vehicle that was present at one front and wasnt on other or one gun that was present at one battle and not the other.