You mean the tank that has never, ever, seen combat in the battle of moscow?
Stop us from removing a vehicle that historically never participated in the battle, that we have found documental proof for? From replacing it with a proper vehicle that would better match the T-26 in usage?
And this game started development in 2015.
Just saying that age is just a matter of perception.
The graphics are the ONLY thing that age. Game design is timeless.
And this game has had some absolutely terrible design implementations.
This game, I mean Enlisted, sucks.
see in this post the game design compare to RO2 is terrible
RO2, as well as BF2, which were made in 2011, the same year that 10 years ago.
They made a high level of how to make a FPS game that make both realistic-fan and arcade-fun happy in a game.
But I can’t see any good sign of this game could match those games that I said above though 10 years have already passed. 
This game started form the end of 2016, and now? Maybe it is just a demo of this whole game.
No content, no guns, just the copy and paste bulidings, soliders```
the designer had said 1 shoot 1 kill,I saw it in BERLIN test but now in MOSCOW , WHERE IS IT???
I would prefer to play BF3 now than Enlisted.
Enlisted have nothing new (from a tester who played April-Moscow-Test, May-Berlin-Test, September-CBT, and more)
Enlisted should be a good game if the mechanism fixed.
If the game developed from the April-Mosocow-Tese in 2020, it would be good.
Other so called changes, I mean seriously it sucks.
Ive paid 50$ for this game , in my country i can buy 2 Red Dead Redemption 2 with these money ,more than 10 RO2, how can this game compare with Red Dead Redemption 2 and RO2
WarThunder
You are not giving criticism or complaint particularly, merely going on about stupid stuff that you can’t even compare, provide constructive feedback that can actually be understood of what you think should be changed so it can be discussed and perhaps implemented.
Oh my god, will everyone stop going on about Red Orchestra 2, that game is 100% complete and is ten years old, with plenty of community additions, this game is nowhere near that point, so please provide constructive feedback to this game specifically, or none at all. @47671912 @30029933 @sfh0525
Also, stop going on about paying $50-60 to play the game, it very, VERY clearly stated what you were getting for that price which you didn’t have to pay I might add, you only had to buy one pack to get access and didn’t even have to do that in the first place, but saying you paid even $50 to play this game is extremely disingenuous.
Plus that money is to support the devs, not active monetisation for the game, everything that has happened in game so far has been rewards to players, not setup as monetisation venues, we do not yet know how they will do so.
And in reference to being F2P, that was a community decision a few years back, so don’t turn it on the devs, besides, you realise that games cost money to make and then it costs money to keep servers running, let alone continual dev support right?
In the past version, Berlin, Moscow AT, this game looks promising. But now, as my locked threads
https://forum.enlisted.net/t/can-you-stop-fucking-input-disgusting-mechanism-even-when-the-game-is-just-half-finished/3162/26
They are just doing poorer and poorer.
There is a very obvious reason why that thread is locked, I suggest you do not bring it up.
Plus as I said, create a thread with actual constructive feedback, not some BS long ass post saying nothing.
Just because you and the dev cant bear any criticism?
And this is the mess room, I have the right to share my thoughts, now the criticism to this game.
You have no right to be actively rude to anyone, at least without repercussion, the thread was not locked for them not bearing criticism, it was locked because you were just being extremely rude and toxic. If you think it was ok to do so and especially if you think it was because they can’t bear criticism, perhaps you need to leave the forum and not come back, perhaps even leave the game entirely if you cannot produce a well constructed and calm post that clearly expresses the improvements you would like to see without being rude. We do not want to deal with people who cannot do such a simple task and don’t think about what they say, or worse in your case, think that it is right to do as you did.
While I agree here
This is false. While there are some ways to get access, those are luck based. If you want guaranteed access right now, you have to pay.
Yet their design principles show that many people still care about it despite being that old, so it has stuff done right. Being in beta is not an excuse for terrible game design, only an excuse for lack of content.
VERY false. You buy ingame items - so it is monetization.
If it was setup like “donate X and if you donate more than Y you get Z”, then it was for support.
Here you are BUYING PACKS. It is monetization. The devs have made it very clear that they are interested in making more premium packs with their “feedback on prem soldiers” thread, but not actually changing anything about the existing premium soldiers.
They are most likely preparing a premium squad for Normandy as we speak
On top of that, we already have seen a preview for premium account time, giving +100% XP rate on everything, +1 max infantry squad in matches and +1 max vehicle squad in matches (meaning you can take both planes and tanks etc)
The current international community feels very different about it than the mostly Russian community at the time
And you do realise they already have financial investment by Gaijin, money coming in from CRSED FOAD and have already done a kickstarter for Enlisted, right?
That was locked for inproper language. If your critisism was written properly, it would not have been locked.
That I have to agree on
And at this point you are becomming rude.
Sorry but as a non native English speakers, this is what I can express and my anger.
its a game in 2011, 10 YEAR PAST HAD THE GAME born ,how cant i compare,are you something wrong???