I don’t play enough Normandy to have a comment on those inaccuracies, however, I’ve made complaints before regarding the MkB 42 for the Sniper III. It’s lazy ESPECIALLY since they put the Gewehr 41 as a premium sniper squad. I would like to see them fixed because the more inaccuracies they get away with, the more that one april fool’s joke about the weapon skins becomes a reality. I want to play an arcade version of WW2 that has some resemblance of accuracy, while including prototype weaponry, not just another version of CoD or BFV where any gun goes to any side and in the future, it’s just Red vs. Blue like in CoD Vanguard.
1 Like
Really from all thing you complain about, cant have for free the sniper broken reload 41? You want know wy you have the sniper mkb in moscow? Because the other side gear from lv0 is better than the german end game gear
No, progression is a incredibly complex problem that needs fundamental changes, and cannot be addressed so easily. On the other hand, keeping the playerbase from fracturing too much is something that can be managed in a far simpler manner, but allowing people to que for more than one campaign at the same time won’t fix anything, just like the que for either team doesn’t fix faction imbalance in campaigns.
1 Like
Exacly.
There will be always a better team with better equipment or a better squad selected on a spawn.
Shit ain’t 1to1 and will never be.
Hoping they stop add campaign and add bastogne/market garden to normandy
I never said it was going to be a simple fix, however both the things I suggested are a start, and they seem to be doing the exact opposite of fixing things right now, and are just abandoning any sense of realism.
You can’t fix progression in pieces, you need to fundamentally redo the system which needs a lot of time and effort, which even if they have been working on doing so for the past year, they still would likely not be finished with even a draft of a new system.
1 Like
Yeah, adding maps from other places to preexisting seems like a good way to include more variety to the game without fragmenting the playerbase further. You could also add Leningrad to Moscow as well as Sicily and maybe Egypt to Tunisia.
1 Like
So you’re telling me people actually complaining about the boys AT rifle and suggesting they replace it with demo packs so when a tank sits in the grey zone they can complain about that too, jusus fucking christ does this playbase complain to get things how they want so it provides the perfect excuse for more complaining. It’s not just black and white what was in the Pacific, Britain was also there in Borneo, Singapore Indonesia, Australia and new Zealand so why can’t America have a few AT rifles.
1 Like
Marine Rangers apparently liked them, and Marines have a strange way of getting their hands on non standard issue weapons that they like.
Is better fuse the entire eastern front in one campaign
Sicily instead is better have a new campaign only on italy, otherwise we see shitty uniform of afrika on new map
The north africa because the equipment is the same can be unifiied with egypt and algeria
Berlin can remain standalone but need be expanded
If dev decide to make theatre instead of single battle like pacific even in old campaigns for sure the game bcomd 100 time better
1 Like
Yeah, I was just spitballing there, I’m pretty sure if you sat down and planned it out, you could come out with something far better.
1 Like
It’s pretty much in line with everything else they’ve done so far, no? Maybe even looks like a marginal improvement, but not exactly impressive. I’m sure it will get worse as we learn more details…
1 Like
guess thats what is enlisted about … and i quite like it
me as a fan of pacifico I thought the levels were cool, of course, I have my reservations and I would love for several other things to be added, but we have to remember that the campaign hasn’t even been released yet and in the future the devs can add more things, whether they like it or not > >>sometimes<< listen to the fans, an example of this is the tiger that was added in Normandy, it was a tank that had been requested for a long time and was added, in the future the devs will definitely add more content to the campaign (I hope ). but for now I’m optimistic
I think everyone isn’t getting the point of the thread. The devs were so lazy and copy pasted so many guns that there could have been something better.
For example the stupid Johnson 1941 rifle needs to stop being used already.
And I can agree we could have went without a grease gun easily.
1 Like
Well in this case, the Marines absolutely loved the Johnson rifle, so it actually belongs in this campaign. As for the grease gun, the US needs some low level SMG and the grease gun is pretty good all things considered.
2 Likes
I have a suspicion that they are intentionally introducing new campaigns with underwhelming selection of equipment. To make sure that they have something iconic / desirable to add later and possibly reignite interest in that campaign.
Such an approach almost makes sense on paper. Too bad that for those who actually play the game it makes campaigns feel like empty soulless shells. Like something designed to bait you into paying while providing as little as possible in return.
Just to be sure… Pacific is not released yet right?
It isn’t, but they’ve shown the equipment that will be included at release.