Why the new Pacific levels are disappointing

Suggestions
1

It really just seems like the devs weren’t passionate about Pacific whatsoever. Barely any love can be found here.

Just effortless recycling and cutting corners.

Throwing historical accuracy to the bin is also bad. There are countless other ways you could have done this but you just took the lazy way out.

Why are we mixing late war and early war?

I get enlisted did make some time traveling already with the Jumbo but that was just a few months from the battle. Now we have 2 years away?

It just seems like lazy asymetrical balance again, which just sucks honestly.

Why do we need so many SMGs? 1-2 Thompsons 1 with Drum late campaign and another without early, M55 Reising, and Owen for Early war.

1-2 thompsons again for late war, M3A1, M55, and Owen if you really want to. Of course more shotguns

Why do we need 3 Semi autos again? And experimental trophy guns for the japanese?

Japan gets 2 german SMGs, only 1 SMG that was actually widely used and iconic, and the other another prototype. Disappointing. I get we need some experimental SMGs for Japan but cmon. You could have added 2 Type 100s. (One late, other early) and and an experimental one for variety. fully enough.

Tanks for the US are just meh. Both very similar early Stuarts. Where are the LVTs?

AT weapons are again boring. For japan its fine, but for US giving the Boys ATR? Really? Couldnt you have given us a satchel charge, incendiary grenades anything else that was actually used for AT purposes?

2 BARs again. Epic fun

Couldnt have added the M1917 Browning? And a new brace mechanic like in BF5 or HLL for these heavy guns?

Just the same stuff we seen already, and that would be fine but again if they give 0 fucks about the setting and historical accuracy of it, whats the point? How is it different from BF5?

TLDR:

No passion, no love making these levels.

9 Likes
2

the lvt-1 is a troop transport available on the map and the other with the pack

1 Like
3

Because most player like it. Do you really think bolt action rifle is interesting for most player ?

Premium squad.

At rifle vs At rifle what is the problem?

Many people love those level.

15 Likes
4

Yes, full auto only isnt interesting as lots of BA and some auto

No

Its a premium

Thats the point itll be rare af

Idk that US didnt use that crap?

Stalingrad levels received way more hype and positive feedback than Pacific.

Here its just mixed

3 Likes
5

Whether you like or not, most player like auto weapon and used them very often.

So what is the problem of stuart?

Because there is no better substitute. satchel charge and incendiary grenade are not main weapon, they belong to grenade slot.

Stalingrad is just a bunch of copy paste, and it is being paywall, it received a lot of criticize .
This campaign has way more unique thing and everyone can unlock it.

3 Likes
6

honestly i like most of these levels, they got some new stuff instead of just the classic copy paste (though the sword vs shotgun level seems kinda unfair)

3 Likes
7

Murika must suffer.

3 Likes
8

I don’t like to play bolt rifles. If you don’t like automatic weapons, maybe you can try Red Orchestra 2

9

Because very few weapons on both sides change between early war and late war, the only thing that would really change are the vehicles. Furthermore, that would split the playerbase even more, and that is a far more pressing concern than being 100% historically accurate.

You expect the devs to be able to make enough content in the future without holding some stuff back? There is a reason they didn’t add the M1919A6 or the Tiger to Normandy until over a year after the campaign was released.

10

What do you mean split the playerbase?

Either do a late or early war campaign

Late perferably, due to more weapons and more interesting battles

11

But you lose access to interesting weapons if you choose one or the other, and it becomes very hard to even get to 40 levels. The way that the devs have done it, there will be content for a very long period of time, which is the correct thing to do.

1 Like
13

Most people just spam auto weapon, they never care about bolt action rifle.

1 Like
14

BA rifles may not be the best weapons but they are certainly one of the most fun ones.

8 Likes
15

Actually USMC used BOYS ATR, they bought it from Canada. they used until the Bazooka arrived, and After its arraival at Pacific some of they still have used. It’s historical so to speak.

16

You dont lose acces if you do late war tho

That way you can keep it historical and have tons of equipment

17

muh myopinionhere didnt like it muh disappointed

18

No, but you lose access to early war, which means no Johnson rifle or LMG, no Type 11, no M1A1 flamethrower, no M50 Resing, no M1 Bazooka and that is just weapons. Pretty much every vehicle in the campaign right now has to go as well.

2 Likes
19

8 Likes
20

I whatched a video of the m50 now and, lol is better than the thompson, wy is so early here? Ok 20 bullet but berettaM38 in moscow have 20 bullet and is so high in the grind

21

Probably the 20 bullet mag, the rest of the stats seem identical to the M1A1 Thompson. As for the Berretta, you are asking questions science cannot answer.