But at 0.6? Even the M1941 Johnson LMG only has 0.6, and it weighs 5.9kg. Shouldn’t the Johnson have the fastest ADS for an MG in game since it weighs the lightest?
It may not be visible, but I’ve been playing this game since the closed beta. I use all of every BR’s weapons. And very often I play on BR 3 and I don’t leave the game when it puts me on BR 5.
I use the BAR 1918 rifle in both the tree version and the premium version with this weapon, which in the premium version is exactly the same as the tree version.
Which BAR would you say is the best out of them all?
German (Polish) one is best.
And if you consider WAR as part of the BAR family, then that’s the best BAR like weapon.
3 Likes
in terms of statistics, the A2 version, but I like that in the 1918 version you can feel the clumsiness of a first-war weapon.
But what I like most is the Browning wz.28 rifle, which is owned by the Germans. This is a Polish Browning, which the Germans captured in 1939 and also occupied the factories.
1 Like
In real life, the Axis lost. Is it necessary to make sure that the Axis always loses
in the game?
realism does not exist in games.
after increasing Axis firepower of BR2 , it really don’t need to do for others.
I’m sorry, but no. ZB26 opened pandora’s box. it doesn’t belong on BR2. Or remove it on B3, or BAR 1918 on BR2 and increase the firepower of BR2
The Third Reich lost the war, but it won battles often, and even the Wehrmacht sometimes won in 1945.
The reason for the defeat of the Third Reich is more complex than you think. In fact, they lost the war from the very beginning in the factories, because the war is not fought only on the front and in the government’s gadgets, but above all in the factories.
And if the German equipment in games was the same as in reality, and not on paper, players would use 90% of the Stug III because it was the most failure-free armored unit. And if ballistics in games were realistic, you could incapacitate the tiger with a 47 mm gun.
2 Likes
I thought you are going to say this 
, lol.
3 Likes
It makes the most sense for BR1 and BR2 to be WW1 equipment that was “left over” and used early war. The US weapons pretty well follow this except the M3A1 should be a BR3, the M1928 should be a BR2 (swap places) and the M1918 should be knocked down to a BR2. Unscoped Springfields make ZERO sense showing up in Normandy or Belgium, but make perfect sense in a Wake Island, Phillipines, or Chinese setting 1938-1941. The island defenders were scrounging everything that would fire a bullet and Springfields were very desirable “second line” weapons because they fire the same .30-06 ammunition th3 Garand does.
The Federov is a complicated case because it was a useless, overengineered piece of crap. The Communists destroyed them all in the interwar period becauss they used Arisaka ammunition. Any that would have been accidentally available would have been sent to the Winter War and abandoned on the battlefield when they inevitably broke down. It shouldn’t really be in the game except as a Gold Pass weapon for someone to pretend that they magically found a functioning Federov in Soviet Russia.
Just make the M1918 a BR5 select-fire rifle, 2 problems solved at the same time.
Since the ZB something (Czech lmg) is now br2, I wouldn’t mind.
However…
We keep lowering the br of so many things. It feels like…
There’s NO “low br” anymore. Just medium and high…
3 Likes
ZB is hideous trash in comparison to any BAR. There’s definitely at least one BR difference in power level.
2 Likes
I like the ZB 
Not as powerful as any BAR sure. Too much recoil.
But “hideous trash”… that’s far fetched
Intentionally
Wait.
Aren’t you Czech?
Yes, but I don’t have that “nationalistic proudness” which makes you like something just because it is part of your nation’s history.
ZB should definitely be BR2. It’s basically type 97 but without scope (which was always BR2).
(It’s fine. It removes some of my guilt of hating the sten in all versions. Was useful sure, but what garbage!)
1 Like
Why should Czechoslovakia continue not to exist? Is it for negative reasons or positive reasons?