Weapons and vehicles of the next update

Well

I guess, because it’s was just experimental paper. And it have just different characteristics on different tests.

1 Like

You can do it like this

:heart_decoration: :heart: :orange_heart: :blue_heart: :black_heart: :brown_heart: :green_heart: :white_heart: :purple_heart: :+1: :hearts: :arrow_up: :white_check_mark: :ballot_box_with_check: :arrow_up_small: :arrow_double_up: :small_red_triangle:

3 Likes

SO the Super-Pershing a 1 off field modification is a good addition to the game you think yes?
Even normal Pershing was only field tested at very end in few numbers.
You do realize this makes battles even further from reality?
Not to mention the PROPOSED tank destroyer version of Chi-RI, which itself was a 1 prototype not completed vehicle… facepalm
VEry nice with lots of more vechiels and weapons, but the fact the merge made the game into WT is still SHIT.
Adding more vehicles or weapons doesn not help the play of the game is terrible
#bringbackoldenlisted

I like to think that the Japanese voiceline guy was just some forty something office worker they pulled off the street who got increasingly into it and he was completely gone when they had him record the BAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNZZZZZAAAAAIIIIII
Because he sounds like he ate the fucking mic to do it lmfao

1 Like

There is a good chance there is a hidden attribute that is actually quite useful.

Im just speculating but in the halftrack videos the passengers stayed seated.

I feel like they might actually lean out and shoot of the trucks. For anyone that loves the battlebus as much as I do, you know how much better the AI shoots from the battlebus :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

I will have to wait for the link to the PDF for that Jap book. Amazon users don’t have many kind things to say about it.

As for the developers citing Ivan’s best friend Andrey, some of the stuff he says makes sense in context but provides no sources from whatever godforsaken website this is.
Tenacity Worth Putting to Better Use | Warspot.ru

The guy sure did put in a lot of effort.

I’m actually almost disappointed even when the attack is successful and the charge stops, because by the sound alone, you’d expect your soldier to keep charging and stick 3 or 4 marines on his bayonet in a row XD.

3 Likes

I need the Godzilla Minus One OST for when I’m playing as the Japs

3 Likes

From a gameplay standpoint I’m glad it stops though

Excellent work and pace! These additions will be great. I’m 10/10 looking forward to it.

Very curious to see how customization will be tackled in the next update. If they make no change and add the new Ardennes map as a “campaign” it’s game over bros. This means that in theory, a german squad at BR 3 which can fight on all campaigns, Moscow (downtiered), Tunisia, Stalingrad, Ardennes, Normandy and Berlin (uptiered), with 7 soldiers, would have to spend, in just torso pieces ALONE: 336 customization orders. That’s 336 customization orders to outfit just the torso for a single squad of 7 elements! Hopefully they’ll stop this insanity

2 Likes

I had saved 1200 customisation orders for merge…

I started equipping 1 squad then realised how rough it was.

Had to stop…waiting for it to be fixed.

3 Likes

Same. I have 1497 orders but not bothering until they improve the way it “works.”

I’m also done building squads for different BR’s and nations until they fix presets. They’re nearly useless right now (totally useless in my opinion - not everyone can afford to upgrade every single weapon in inventory fully).

2 Likes

I only bothered with Building BR 2 decks based on MM.

As for the presets I agree. I am fortunate enough to have enough squads and weapons to make use of the current preset system…but yeah…

1 Like

I agree on the Super Pershing bit just because its field modifications are ugly as shit. Also the M26 can pen the Tiger II (H) if given APCR rounds, so the Super Pershing upgrade wouldn’t be needed. Also more realistic to have basic M26s than the Super Pershing, since the M26s were actually used (albiet in extremely low numbers) while the Super Pershing was literally a 1-of.

1 Like

I want my cosmetic items lost in the merge back as soon as possible!

3 Likes

I wonder if they will add for low br shotguns like the Murata one

In the sides of the tiger II but not the front as the M3 90mm sell would struggle against sloped surfaces the T15E1 90mm could acutely penn the Tiger II cheeks thanks to the gun having a beter velocity.

Their was actualy two others Super Pershings but they never saw combat also we don’t know if it is a premium or not

I would say its a tech tree. Its necessary as a counter for King Tiger H, which is tech tree. Makes the most sense.

3 Likes

How is it ironic? I don’t think English wiki is more trustable when it comes to Japanese stuff.

Seems like someone fail to read simple English.
Can’t you see that the model1 and model 2 are not Tokyo arsenal 1927 ffs? They are smg made in 1936 and 1937. Please open your eye and read carefully next time.

Don’t conclude when you can’t even read things properly.