Seelow Heights of Br2 is more fun than i expected, although downtime between fights is a bit too high. Maybe for BR2 those objectives should be a bit closer together?
And maybe just maybe capture time should be shortened as the first point took eternity to take.
Other issue are plane spawns, bombers need to fly for almost 4km to reach the capture points. So can you move plane spawn a bit closer?
It’s the issue for both ground and air it seems too much downtime. Gonna test other Berlin maps.
I had a Tunisia BR5 match where Germany rolled the US as fast as could possibly be done. So… more testing required maybe?
Well, you allowed all the historical weight of the game to be banned by accepting the “merge”, now you’re going to be sad when you see jets over Moscow? This is the beginning of the pain, look at that other neighboring game.
Well it’s like you said… Enemy deserted. Thats typically the case in a steamroll.
It’s definitely not a unique thing to Tunisia or Moscow just because of a higher BR.
what a crazy experience it was to try the new maps.It was very special to see late war tanks in tunisia.
Please keep this up.
By “accepting” the merge???
Like anyone had a choice??
Nice victim shaming!
There were plenty of people asking for something like it f’sure, but the actual implementation of it was a dog’s breakfast, and that much was also made plain in the testing.
Thoroughly enjoying it!
The terrain of Tunisia and Moscow can present a despairing and overwhelming situation in a high BR battle, while the Tiger II in the quarry and the P47 in the cave are driving people crazy.
This is bullshit.
Well… When you have just inaccurate Jumbo/T-50 in Normandy/Moscow - it’s okay.
When you have MKB/Pz4F2 it’s quite okay.
When you have some terrible crap of 1945 in 1941 campaign - it’s well… okay it’s few of them and they unpopular + some vehicles like puma, still it’s okay…
But Tigers/AS/IS/Pershings/Jumbos/etc in early campaigns - hell no, that’s whole different deal. It’s finally kill whole aesthetics/authetic/atmosphere. Jets in Battle for Moscow god damn it.
Interesting what’s the next move to sink this ship?
I thought first and foremost it is a test to see if people a fine with these trials?
And if they are not,
which it seems to me we clearly aren’t,
then no changes for any maps are needed?
Thanks for ruining the game!!!
This is one of the worst innovations that you could add, the maps of Moscow and Tunis are stupidly not suitable for high levels, that’s just how many maps don’t fit, what’s the point of this?
Even if some individual maps can be played at least somehow at high levels, why would that change anything from one map?
Moreover, the old system allowed you to choose which specific cards you want to play on, for 1-2 br you got most of the time to Moscow, and for 5 br to Berlin. Moreover, the old system allowed you to choose which specific cards you want to play on, for 1-2 br you got most of the time to Moscow, and for 5 br to Berlin. But now there’s no way, and you don’t have to tell us about the choice of maps, at best it will be possible to block 2-3 maps, and taking into account their number and variation, it won’t do anything.
And finally, although there was no historicism in the game, but the entourage of Berlin and Moscow was preserved at least partially, you all And finally, although there was no historicism in the game, but the entourage of Berlin and Moscow was preserved at least partially, you’re spoiling everything.
In general, let’s return everything as it was.
Oh, @ZОV-nicolaij1914 , hello. Yeah, if you came here, it means things are really bad with our game. I agree with you, actually. The new card selection system is just unplayable garbage.
Also moscow manor is based on real life location
And the monastery might be inspired by Joseph Volokolamsk monastery that was damaged by germans in ww2
Or it could be inspired by New Jerusalem monastery
Also there is Beloe lake, Vysokovo and Voskhod all in moscow althought they barely resemble their real life counterparts
That’s right, I came here to write my dissatisfaction with the new system.
Yes, but they’re not iconic in any way. So unless you are Russian living in near area. Those maps have nothing screaming “Battle of Moscow” at all.
True. I just wanted to note it as i think these locations are interesting to see in real life
The changes are disgusting, before I could take 2BR and go play in Moscow without Berlin, but now I can’t. Berlin maps are some of the worst in the game and I don’t want to play them, especially on 2BR. I tried how Moscow plays on 5BR, it’s like hell, tanks and planes just don’t let you play.
I had a lot of fun playing soviets with BR 5 on Monastery and Maisky. Clearly there are some issues with the HE spam in Tunisia, but like they said, those issues can and will be fixed.
Assuming those issues will be fixed, I think this is a great ideea and greatly expands the map pool. Would I prefer new maps over these old ones ? Of course. But if I have to choose between no new maps and these maps, I will always choose the option that keeps the game fresh. Using BR 5 on maps in which I only used BR 2, feel completely different.
Like many others have stated, Monastery, Maisky Forestry and Beloe Lake do not have MOSCOW 1941 stamped on them. They feel like a regular fortress or settlement in eastern Europe.
*random spamming
That did make some sense, but in that logic the only ironic map in this game is those in Berlin city center (that is, around Reich Chancellery) as it is the only foreigners recognized. Other parts in Berlin could just be some random bombarded German city like Hamburg (One real thing: The Chinese localization of this game assumed that the map River Crossing took place on the Elbe River), Tunisia is anywhere in North Africa or Middle East, Rzhev is same with Stalingrad, as in-game customization approved, and we still don’t know the forrest is Hurtgen or Ardennes, also as in-game customization approved.
