Then why you even ask? Or you dont have a FG42?
I have a fg 42 2, that’s why I m saying - fg 42 2 > avt
So US should get KT too or how should that work?
I just dont think anyone concidered the US fighting it when they introduced it into berlin to fight the USSR.
far as I know pershing is coming, which should be capable to fight kt2.
If not, altering stats isnt exactly anything new for df.
Kinda yeah, super pershing has already been announced
The M9 has no problems killing the Tiger II, but yes a bigger badder AT weapon I’m all for
Shhh! Don’t say it, we need more boom, because boom.
I’m extremely hyped for my Pershings however.
I think I asked for them for a good 2 years now…
So you have both, and still lie about AVT40 being worse than FG42 II? That’s funny, cuz you are telling me you have skill issue?
Well, maybe you can show a video where you jam the entire auto store into a point. Or you don’t have a squad with an auto 40?
Maybe after 9,000 fights I’ve lost my game(((((
Because avt 40 is better than fg 42 2 because the table says so.
pretty much yes.
You can have your personal opinions, stats dont lie.
while at it with the stats, you might want to check out how much more OP those 250kg bombs are compared to 100kg.
nvm il do it for you
Because the table is the only real fact of this game filled full of hidden buffs and nerfs
Yeah, but there’s a nuance. What’s the point of it if it’s not the same in the game itself?
Yes the Pershing’s are incredible. Hope we get a Jumbo Pershing to go with our Super Pershing. There’s something different about the doctrine that cause the creation of the Jumbo tanks
“We need an assault gun to help the infantry push fortified positions”
“Just weld and extra slab of metal to the front of our medium tank”
Bang, Jumbo tanks
Also right next to it in terms of my favorite armor developments is slapping something on a pair of treads/shoving something inside of a turret and calling it a day. Which is to say, all American MC’s. GMC’s, HMC’s, MGMC’s, MMC’s, all of em. Any sort of self propelled, as that’s what our Motor Carriers are, are my favorite type of armor
So technically speaking, the M4A3 (105) and the StuH, and the M4A3E2 and the StuG are the same
You better ask Devs about this BS
Btw, you will get that AVT40 vs FG42 II video as soon as I arrive home after work… for another 5 hours
?
Oh, oh, oh, and T26E2/M45! 105mm M2 Howitzer shoved inside of the Pershing and the gun mantlet thickened to I believe over 200mm thick just to support the gun. Also very, VERY high tier
Doesn’t get the good ammo
76mm on the Shermans can only pen the turret face on the KT P and from the sides on the KT H
Can slap it through the KT’s sides especially the turret bin in the back
Good plane and bombload
Shame the Yank one only gets 100lb bombs instead of the centerline 500lb
I mean yes you can kill with it but let me take a look at german and soviet ATs. Soviets and germans get to use panzerfaust 60 at rank 3 and oh god look it can pen 180 mm of tanks armor, of course king tigers have 80 at sides but lets be honest americans would love AT boom stik that can pen more than 102 mm. Also at rank 4 both soviets and germans get panzerfaust 100 and how much it can pen? 2 times more that m9, 220 mm of tanks armor! Now tell me what will do a better job, something that can pen 100 mm or something that can pen 200?
Bollocks. The only loadout that the soviets dont have a BR equivalent too is the ju188 6x250 at br 4. so soviets are losing because of a single plane that any of their fighters/attacker can obliterate? (Sounds like the p-47 excuse…how do the USA deal with the ju188…)
Soviets instead get the low BR 2 sb m 2 6x100…(much like the soviets have the Heavy Tank Monopoly in mid BR, Germans the Heavy tank “advantage” at High Br)
Plus some nice fighters that can do some cool things…
Jebus just give them the yer-2 or the tu-2 already to put this excuse to rest (and the ju 88 or HE-111 to match the sb 2m at BR 2)
Soviets just need more players at High BR, they must be elsewhere atm (the ones that know how to use their own gear)