1 Like
let’s see how you destroy that KT if he decides to angle
Can you show it in battle?)))
1 Like
you see comrade, if he angles, he is easier to flank
2 Likes
Oh so you don’t even own one?
Mosin Diakonov and RNM50: really?
My objection to downtiering more equipment is simple: they need to fix the current BR system not make it worse by creating more meta monsters.
If BR3 only fought in BR2-3 and BR3-4, most problems would be solved.
2 Likes
I suppose you have some data about it then.
2 Likes
rbs 82 < Wfr.Gr.21
1 Like
Okay, this is very valid data as I asked. I will never question you again.
And after all you were again right.
Gr.21 indeed has better penetration values and slightly better damage.
And best part is that you can have less BR 4 / 5 Gr.21 rockets than you can have BR1 RBS 82 rockets.
So no un-necessary spamming due to higher capacity.
Definitely a better tactical choice than ~8 rockets & bombs.
8 mediocre missiles and 4 small bombs
A bigger bomb is better, it is guaranteed to take away the tank
1 Like
Yes, missiles that are more than capable to defeat everything they fight at theyr respective br.
To be fair here, if you somehow magically fail to destroy a tank with rockets, im pretty sure you wont do any better with bombs.
anyway, bombs are amazing totally not nerfed to ground.
1 Like
Yes, they are very good at killing one crew member and breaking tracks
1 Like
Had to actually go and try, since I still use fairly often the BF109 G6 for its fighter capabilities & 4x50kg.
Since I did try stuka back in moscow and those 250kg’s offered little to nothing as improvement.
And apparently it seems still to be same, doesnt really matter is it 250kg or 50kg both kill tank as long as you drop it either straight in thru hatch or right nexto.
And apparently according to these datamined stats you kindly provided I was yet again wrong.
the 250kg offers a whopping 1.5metres bigger explosion radius.
Definitely worthy reason to take stuka with none fighter capabilities over g6.
1 Like