Reward players who do not lose so many soldiers

Suggestions
168

I see now why people are confused

You don’t understand what is being described or you falsely allocate your own false understanding to what is being said

So going to clarify some things

When I am referring to the issue of rushing, I am not saying you cannot push intelligently while clearing what is in front and around you. I am saying don’t just ran at bullets.

And so what you people do is you presume that means to just sit back and camp.

That is not what I mean.

There is a big difference between pushing with awareness and care, and just camping and never moving or moving super slowly, or just running in the open at bullets.

The issue is only with the people running at bullets dying repeatedly and never think to do anything different. This suggestions helps those people consider improving their gameplay.

So everything else you falsely assume from what I have said, is just your own nonsense and false

And no, the suggestion won’t turn everyone into campers, because the incentives to win and cap and get cap points are still more important.

The suggestions is an extra incentive as a side mission or side goal

So again, instead of being so scared and hysterical about this, use your brains, if you have any.

1 Like
169

My response to you was about your confusion about how to use spawn points and the challenges of eliminating the enemy spawns, so not sure how you think I’m the one who sucks at the game. I know that if we do not remove the enemy spawn, then they can spawn closer and have the advantage, which is what I was trying to teach you, since you clearly did not understand it and seemed so confused about it.

You presume that kill domination is not relevant, when in fact it is the one thing that decides the majority of matches in this game.

What people and dummies like you don’t understand is that you only get caps because the killers on your team have made it easier for you to do so. If all you do is run at bullets, your results will vary depending mostly on your teams killing capabilities vs the enemies killing capabilities.

But if you want to be the moron that thinks that 500 kills by a player is inferior to a player with only 20 kills, go ahead, you keep believing what ever nonsense you want, but when you put that up against people with actual brains, you are going to be exposed. And many of you are being exposed as people who just want idiots in this game and want to stimulate braindead gameplay. Because you want to have other players be inferior to you.

That is all it comes down to.

1 Like
171

I don’t know, when the rest of the community gives you a resounding no as an answer and you still keep going, I think you might be the dummy here.

5 Likes
172

Lmao

1 Like
173

stats

3 Likes
174

He really belive in what he say witch is correct in game wo actually reward stay alive, but enlisted reward die withaut restrain so all his word are incorrect here and him dont understand that

1 Like
175

i totally believe you that you are great player that totally dominates enemy with his skill, takes the cap and destroys all rally points built by defenders. but just for everyone else sake… post stats…

2 Likes
176

Yes but when given this response, I would expect most people to just move on, maybe to another game.

2 Likes
177

btw @Shiivex you are relatively average player… how many rally points do you destroy in one match as attacker?

1 Like
178

maybe im sweatlord, but ussually – 4-7 :skull:

1 Like
179

if this is the measurement of the collective community intelligence, then it’s pretty clear what the issue is

you need a smarter community, because if this is signal for the level of community intelligence that I have faced here, then who ever adheres to this community is in trouble

as this community representation only wants people to play like braindead zombie chargers who get mowed down repeatedly

which is what I witness repeatedly in matches, and why the suggestion was made

this is very basic stuff to understand, so if your collective drone community only understands to create this culture of morons and ignore any obvious issues, then it’s clear where the problem is. But of course you rather blame someone else than see where they are coming from with their suggestion, that is typical of dumb people

I understand you are reluctant

But also understand something else, the other complaints you have are directly related to this culture of encouraging a weaker dumber playstyle.

At the end of the day, I’m also happy to keep mowing down the morons that run at my bullets too, but when my team mates keep dying because they are too dumb to think about dealing with the issues first, it’s like watching stupidity repeatedly at work, and that is just mind boggling

You think that the game is good to reward dying like idiots, whereas I believe the game has to give more value back to preserving life. And that requires change, and that is all the suggestion does, it offers an idea on how that change can happen.

If you don’t want that change, great, you don’t like that change, but at the end of the day, if you want to make a valid argument, simply saying you don’t like it isn’t a valid argument, because that does not reduce the value that the suggestion brings to the game.

Whereas you have brought zero value to this topic

And trying to change the topic to be about my stats won’t help you, you are exposing just how toxic you are and how you treat people who make suggestions shows what trash people you are

I do not need a players stats to determine whether his suggestion is worth consideration or not. Because I can assess from their discussion whether they know what they are talking about or not.

And some of you have an idea, whereas others are just brain dead dumb drones acting like fanatical followers

1 Like
181

the reason you troll is because you are too dumb to to discuss the topic properly and you have no respect for anyone who suggests something you know nothing about

you want to make the topic about me against the community and about the stats

that has absolutely nothing to do with the suggestion

you start attacking a guy for a suggestion that you don’t understand or don’t want to understand and then expect them to care or respect you when you have zero respect?

Good luck with that

1 Like
182

s-t-a-t-s

3 Likes
183

B-R-A-I-N-S

get some

184

Of course we don’t respect you, we think your idea is dumb, and you won’t even provide the one thing that will lend any sort of credentials to you.

3 Likes
187

image

1 Like
188

u see, if this is the measurement of the collective community intelligence, then it’s pretty clear what the issue is

you need a smarter community, because if this is signal for the level of community intelligence that I have faced here, then who ever adheres to this community is in trouble

as this community representation only wants people to play like braindead zombie chargers who get mowed down repeatedly

which is what I witness repeatedly in matches, and why the suggestion was made

this is very basic stuff to understand, so if your collective drone community only understands to create this culture of morons and ignore any obvious issues, then it’s clear where the problem is. But of course you rather blame someone else than see where they are coming from with their suggestion, that is typical of dumb people

I understand you are reluctant

But also understand something else, the other complaints you have are directly related to this culture of encouraging a weaker dumber playstyle.

At the end of the day, I’m also happy to keep mowing down the morons that run at my bullets too, but when my team mates keep dying because they are too dumb to think about dealing with the issues first, it’s like watching stupidity repeatedly at work, and that is just mind boggling

You think that the game is good to reward dying like idiots, whereas I believe the game has to give more value back to preserving life. And that requires change, and that is all the suggestion does, it offers an idea on how that change can happen.

If you don’t want that change, great, you don’t like that change, but at the end of the day, if you want to make a valid argument, simply saying you don’t like it isn’t a valid argument, because that does not reduce the value that the suggestion brings to the game.

Whereas you have brought zero value to this topic

And trying to change the topic to be about my stats won’t help you, you are exposing just how toxic you are and how you treat people who make suggestions shows what trash people you are

I do not need a players stats to determine whether his suggestion is worth consideration or not. Because I can assess from their discussion whether they know what they are talking about or not.

And some of you have an idea, whereas others are just brain dead dumb drones acting like fanatical followers

6 Likes
189

You don’t need credentials

And I never made the suggestion to win your respect, but if you disrespect me, expect it to be returned to you by multipliers

You are not worthy of me wanting your respect given how you behave

Stats do not deem a suggestion null

You thinking that you need stats to qualify a suggestion shows how dumb you are

Especially when the stats you want are not even anything relating to the suggestion itself, no. You want to go after the person. Even though I have already told you everything you need to know about my stats, you are just too dumb to read and learn what that was and what it means.

190

I see now why people are confused

You don’t understand what is being described or you falsely allocate your own false understanding to what is being said

So going to clarify some things

When I am referring to the issue of rushing, I am not saying you cannot push intelligently while clearing what is in front and around you. I am saying don’t just ran at bullets.

And so what you people do is you presume that means to just sit back and camp.

That is not what I mean.

There is a big difference between pushing with awareness and care, and just camping and never moving or moving super slowly, or just running in the open at bullets.

The issue is only with the people running at bullets dying repeatedly and never think to do anything different. This suggestions helps those people consider improving their gameplay.

So everything else you falsely assume from what I have said, is just your own nonsense and false

And no, the suggestion won’t turn everyone into campers, because the incentives to win and cap and get cap points are still more important.

The suggestions is an extra incentive as a side mission or side goal

So again, instead of being so scared and hysterical about this, use your brains, if you have any.

3 Likes
192

You might think your right, though Zerg rush has its place, but there are various things that have to also be in place to make it effective

I am speaking of when those things are not in place. Germany messed up bigtime in that campaign, so as much as it was credit to soviets, it was a disaster on Germans side with many mistakes made. Never underestimate an opponent, or a foreign land/weather or a foreign people.

I am speaking of those times when swathes of men run at bullets and get cut down and they just die and achieve nothing. Unless absorbing bullets was the goal, then goal achieved.

You are only talking about the times when it works, which is usually due to the factors you will ignore for the convenience of your argument.

For example in Vietnam the vietnamese fighting the americans had no choice but to charge at the enemy in certain situations, because their enemy had total air superiority and control and superior artillery. So their only chance was to get in close quarters so that the Americans would not drop bombs and shells on their own men (despite that happening on occasions). So they laid ambushes (camping) very effectively, and then moved on before artillery could hit them. Though this was not always the case. They too made mistakes and ran at bullets in the wrong places and times.

Mel Gibsons movie of landing zone style warfare on helicopter was a great example of when zerg rushing fails, based on real events. However the movie doesn’t cover the other battlegroup that got completely wiped out by the vietnamese zerg rush there in a different landing zone. All of the americans were killed there on that zerg rush, because the numbers were just too great. But that is a number superiority effect. Which is not always a guarantee for victory either.

But again, different conditions and factors decide which zerg rush wins, and which zerg rush fails.

And my suggestion makes you think more carefully about when to engage it.

Whereas you seem to think it must always be employed by these other players, when that is not always the case and when it is, you have to be aware of what the situation you are rushing into, because if you just run carelessly and don’t clear, you will be cut down.

For example you run in and a tank has the spot on lock, he is going to murder your entire squad and anyone else in the vicinity. Because you did not consider that problem.

And now, if you keep going in there and getting obliterated by the same tank in the same spot and you keep doing it again and again, you are not going to get a different result until you acknowledge that the tank is a problem that has to be dealt with first before running into that same spot again.

2 Likes