Take a breath man, I think he understands your point, he just still disagrees with it.
4 Likes
I took my breath, but I’m not making comparisons I just told him that enhanced mp35 can do it, stop even if he disagrees and says that it sucks they dont change the weapon with an mp5.
No, I told you, Moscow is kind of okay, although I’d rather play for the USSR. It feels like the author is just throwing in such suggestions on purpose, so that users are fighting.
this was understood from the beginning
It’s pretty weird that users are doing this kind of crap instead of having real discussions. Plus he posts it in the suggestions section, so it’s actually spam.
probably trying to attract you know who … I had a discussion with him where he did nothing but change the subject before, sorry if I used the caps look
If we’re being honest, the entire PPSh vs MP38 discussion is off topic and out of hand. Original Post is about replacing MKb with G41 Sniper, and we kinda touched on that or related arguments in a couple places?
Your reply to the topic, which was the first, and had nothing to do with the issue at hand.
on topic
on topic
on topic
I’ve been just as bad at staying on topic, to be fair.
How is putting a suggestion in the “Suggestions” forum in any way spam?
oh this was an actual suggestion. I do want the sniper Mkb to be removed. Just that this squabble is funny to me
2 Likes
If the goal is to laugh and troll rather than reach agreement, this is the mud room.
The author mentioned that Mkb “breaks the balance”, I replied that technically PPSh does the same thing, however it would be here. This is called compensation.
the weapon is neither hot nor cold, unless three sniper teams are spamed, armed with her, but it is the same as the ppsh41 does not give problems until it is spammed with three teams of assaulters, a good tip for the forum , stop spam of the same squad class
1 Like
I’d say the MG 34 does the exact same thing. lower mag size but higher damage and better range
Huge spread in motion, huge recoil. Bullet flies to the other side of the screen sometimes.
Anyone else feel like the campaigns are artificially being increased to 40+? Seems like theyre just throwing in whatever they can find, like the MKb, so they can hit that level 40 mark. Making the campaigns just 30 levels and cutting out a bunch of the chaff and ahistorical weapons feels like it’d be a lot easier to balance and a lot more fun to play.
10 Likes
Burst fire and fire it while standing still.
1 Like
You said “the same thing.” PPSh can shoot without resting on the move with no problem. Silly dialogue.
it feels moscow was perfect with 29 levels, wy add more, it will end up breaking it
3 Likes
And if you’d mentioned how the MKb should stay because it’s both balanced and provides additonal CQC firepower to help counter the PPSh, you’d have been on topic, but deflecting the original idea under discussion by dragging out a different perceived imbalance ain’t it.
This is really map dependent in Moscow. PPSh is good on close or urban maps where the spammed assaulters can move freely if they pay attention, but on bigger maps and invasion maps the PPSh struggles at range, Quarry for example.
Eh? There’s plenty of historical weapons and vehicles that could be added to fill those levels, but I’m not sure that represents balance. Soviets could get plenty more historically accurate Lend-Lease vehicles and weapons, Axis could get plenty of Austrian, Czech, Belgian and French stuff. What would they give the Axis to compensate when they added T-34-76 and KV-1?
1 Like
It fills the same function. High DPM and big mag size. Counterparts don’t have to be the exact same
1 Like
It is much worse than PPSh for active gameplay. Huge spread in movement. It’s impossible to use machine guns like before.
1 Like
That’s what I meant, you don’t always have to write every last letter to express the meaning.
The author didn’t provide numbers or specifics, so I won’t either.
1 Like