The MKb Shouldn’t be in Moscow, it didn’t see service there. Also it upsets the balance way too much. I suggest replacing it with a G41 W with scope. As these were made at the time of Moscow and most likely saw service there.
24 Likes
Is PPSh versus a Beretta M38 with 20 rounds of ammunition a balance?
12 Likes
and you would like to take away the toy from the children, did you forget the reaction when someone asks to balance the spam of the fg42?
10 Likes
You have forgot mp35
1 Like
This boat sailed away long time ago.
And it sunk.
12 Likes
And yet it is much worse than PPSh. Everyone seems to agree that the Mkb equals the PPSh, but the Mkb is worse in terms of ammo, DPS, number of weapons in the squad, and the size of the squad where it can be used. The Mkb is better at medium and long range - that’s its only advantage, which does not cover all the other disadvantages.
1 Like
i get that it shouldnt be there because it wasnt in moscow. but does it really upset the balance? its a decent gun. but it really isnt that overpowered
but yes, remove it
Mkb is a shit, really suck as sniper, low ammo, high dispersion (bad in cqc), only medium range figth, i still use gewer98 for sniping
Mp35 full star is equal to berettaM38 and pssh41 so is not bad need grinding
So I don’t understand the cries that it "breaks the balance. The PPSh is damn good at everything but long range, but that’s what the SVT and DP are for.
1 Like
Ah, but it’s from the right timeframe of the war. Keofox has said in the past that the campaigns aren’t meant to be limited to the time frame the title suggests, as the Normandy campaign is meant to represent Operation Overlord and not just the D-Day landings.
The MKb in Moscow is worse than the PPSh/PPD in close combat. At range, it’s more accurate and harder hitting. Up close, it’s better than a bolt gun, and perhaps has an advantage over semi-autos and the hard-recoiling AVS. The Axis gets them for snipers, which makes the snipers equipped with them less effective at long range, but more effective at moderate ranges and better than soviet snipers in CQC by a lot. I’d say the MKb is relatively well balanced in this campaign, since it has a role it’s good at, a couple it can do but not excel at, and a couple it just can’t, like the PPSh is good up close, passable at moderate ranges if used right, and garbage at long range. Balance.
4 Likes
This doesn’t make it bad at CQC, it makes it bad at range.
The Mp-35 is worse than the PPSh in every way except damage (slightly better there). Don’t force me to use math, or do it yourself to prove otherwise.
I really like the Mp-35, I play with it instead of the Beretta with 40 rounds, but it’s still worse than the PPSh
Even cqc bro wen your bullet they literally caress the enemy
Mp35 full star reach 600 rof do almost 7 damage for hit is not bad or inferior to ppsh41 i talked of full star wapons not stock
They don’t though? From the hip, nothing’s accurate. Aimed, it’s not a problem, and the MKb is a two-shot kill before upgrades. Since it’s chambered for an intermediate cartridge, I’d say that’s about right within the game’s mechanics.
What difference does it make to compare guns full star or not? PPSh full star has 1200 rounds per minute and 6.6 damage, is that much better.
Why are you denying the math?
2 Likes
German SMGs don’t need to be as good or better than the drum mag PPD and PPSh. They’re good enough and Axis has advantages elsewhere, like MGs and the Mkb.
1 Like
which means it fires too fast for the servers to accurately keep track of
2 Likes
but the fact remains that many times they go wrong, now probably it’s my fault I don’t know maybe but when I used it I had a lot of difficulties in cqc, and I report my experience if then it went better for you, good for you
1 Like
Buddy, I agree, the author of the post doesn’t take that into account and the other guy proves there is no difference.
It seems like Moscow is more or less in balance, but it’s worth speaking honestly. Mkb>AVS. PPSh>any SMG Axis
3 Likes