Lmao, time spend in game doesn’t equal competency and experiences.
Like whatever, think what you want.
I was responding to this:
“It is really obvious to me, that you really haven’t played tanks much.”
As you can clearly see. I played tanks a lot. Probably more than you. But keep your dishonest argumentation, if you so badly want to. However I’m good or not has ofc nothing to with it.
yea that why i made that one topic about “flak88 too strong for enlisted?” cause i really want it for AA purpose but this will do tbh heavy aa is something i love
1 Like
Yeah, whatever. It wasn’t even an argumentation. But it’s funny you have focused on that one short last part. Says a lot.
1 Like
I’d also like to see US/Japan get better infantry AT launchers. The M9 and Type 4 are woefully incapable of dealing with their opposing heavy tanks.
3 Likes
Ok hear me out
How about a giant 200mm rifle grenade attached to a 20mm giant anti tank rifle, capable of one shotting every vehicle ingame… and still ATR for anti APC work.
US needed T74 many patches ago
9 Likes
Good job, can we interrupt the repair of the tank in case there is a hostile camper suddenly lying on the ground?
I see a lot of comments complaining, it’s annoying to see the same group of people on the forum.
Complaining about everything because it’s not what they asked for when their opinion doesn’t represent 1% of the community.
Who cares about APC customization? Nothing works for this type of players, they cry for everything and their opinion is not reliable because they do it from their perspective, which is not full of well-being for the game but rather for a faction or a point of view that is too inclined or toxic
Good job keep working on the details.
6 Likes
Fixing the breach is one thing…but is the barrel still fucked?
Do you have to get out to fix barrel?..sorta screws my poor churchill when im fighting tiger 2s if it fixes the lot lol
1 Like
Yep.
4 Likes
Thank goodness for that
1 Like
something like the red orchestra 2 tanks would be cool
9 Likes
I am fine with tanks being buffed as well as grey camping AS LONG as devs add some mechanics for countering them. Several ideas have been floated for improving the game dynamics while preserving the main grey mechanics, but there’s been no traction.
Two ideas:
-
Add a “Commando” squad with a “Raider” troop type who is designed for operations behind enemy lines. Make them immune to the grey zone so that they can infiltrate and destroy camping tanks. Keep the squad cap tiny and let the Raiders carry anything they want.(i.e. no weapons restrictions) [Entered into Suggestions]
-
Have the campers subject to a timer. If defenders camp in the grey zone “too long”, unlock the grey zone for an infiltration mission. If the attackers score enough points, the grey zone stays unlocked for that capture point and attackers gain the ability to double envelope the capture point. [Entered into Suggestions]
…few people seem to like these ideas and I’m not quite sure why.
It would be best if objectives were enlarged and ground vehicles had the ability to capture them.
There’s no reasonable feature feature that would prevent from grayzone camping. I think they should instead reward players for not camping and for being active and aggressive.
5 Likes
I thought it would be cool to be able to capture when popped from the commander cupola. Or maybe light tanks can capture
3 Likes
Remove overheating of machine guns on light tanks and enhance their function as anti infantry tanks.
Few people use them after the medium tanks are unlocked.
Also give them the ability to capture CP’s as they are very thinly armored.
Remove overheating from machine guns - Suggestions - Enlisted
5 Likes
This seems like a nice change. My only concern is that tanks will become even more powerful. I think they are balanced well right now.
2 Likes
Corrected
5 Likes
Btw, this thread has had over a dozen posts deleted that are not particularly problematic, with the moderators having strong authority over them.
it remind me of when parrot use to sent the rainbow parrot of his but those are long gone now (cause the mod delete them for some reason)
The situation is different then. Parrot was deleted because he was simply trolling.
There have been mass deletions of statements by 4 or 5 other users here besides myself.
None of them were particularly problematic post.
The moderators seem to have lost their minds.
Whoever did it now has not seen this thread, but soon this will be deleted as well.