Pre-order: “Jungle Hunters” sniper squads

the only pay to win advantage you really get for money is faster progression.

1 Like

So it’s pay to progress? Which I agree on. But pay to win? Hardly.

If they start releasing premiums that is bluntly overpower, say releasing the P-47 we have now in Normandy as a premium. I will call it out. But as of now (fingers crossed) all premiums can be countered quite easily by anything offered in game for free.

Yes the MG45 squad in Berlin is crazy good. But anyone with good aim and map knowledge can easily kill them.

Yes I’m serious. What’s your counter argument? I outlined exactly what can kill what you listed as “overpowered”

To the geniune and brilliant counter tip of “just shoot them”?

Ehh Fick die Henne, I never would have thought about that or literally anyone else. What a mastermind idea. From now on, I will always say that whenever someone mentions a issue in this game.

3 Likes

Great something we didn’t need more snipers and they can’t even build sniper platforms

1 Like

It’s an infantry focused FPS game. What else could you do?

“If you can’t beat 'em, join 'em complain on the forum till they get nerfed”

3 Likes

If we go this way of thinking then the game will never be p2w basically. Even cheaters would be ok.
Because you can always destroy things somehow.

4 Likes

They on this path for year.

Just beacause everything can be killed, doesn’t mean it doesn’t have some advantages.

Always someone to twist words, it’s not pay2win if You don’t have 100% winrate, lame mental gymnastics.

Facts are there are tons of premium squads that give unique, non-obtainable in other ways advantages.
And sure, there are old shit squads, this doesn’t change how power-creep in premium squads been rising for past year.

5-man MG squads vs 3 MG f2p squad
4 flamethrowers instead of 2
60 rockets to spam on point with more exposives

p2w isn’t just pay and win, it’s also paying for any advantage over other players.

So player with 4 f2p slots, which chooses between tank or plane (attacker of fighter), is somehow not in disadvantage against 10 slot dude with planes and tank on top of specialised infantry squads .

This advantages ARE NOT 100% WIN for $,
but You have to be blind to not see how helpfull they are at making game way easier

9 Likes

Amen

2 Likes

Even though I think that P2W in Enlisted is limited and not really gamebreaking, your analysis is correct.

5 Likes

Being glad that Df wasnt always thinking like because otherwise people would still kill entire teams with one 50kg bombs… “because just shoot ze plane!”.

Sorry but you are wrong…
If you have two guys on the same LVL (1vs1) and one have common squad with 2 and second one premium squad 4 flames trooper + eng. who can build almost everything … Who will probably win? There is simply economic rules telling us that it will end: 20:80 for guys who own premium squad.

P2W don´t tell about 100% WR but about to have Highter chance to win … HIGHTER.(1vs1 for guys who own booth premium squad is about skill and battle situation)

I´m understand that they must to make premium unique somehow interesting, I even accept their policy to make some of them P2W (everyone need to eat) but I don´t understand player who are not able to accept that fact and trying to constantly convince other player about skill issue…

6 Likes

Because p2w is just lame excuses.

This game is extremely casual and it’s filled with casuals and bots so hard. You don’t need any premiun stuff to dominate in enlisted. You don’t have to be even good fps player. All you have to do is watch few YouTube vids to learn how rally points etc are important. Or you can simply play 24/7 vehicles.

This game will never be balanced anyway. Even after BR levels will be a thing.

It’s just another extremely over exaggerated “problem” made up by guys who spend way too much time in this game. So they’re annoyed in pretty much any imperfection that is not mirroring their own idea of perfect version of Enlisted.

Reality check for you. Games aren’t made for this kind of players anymore.

4 Likes

I would argue that being forced to use 5 of the same guns is a disadvantage compared to having 3 or 4 of the weapon and 3 rifles.
most free squads have access to 3 specialists while premiums only have access to 1 (engineer), even if it can build anything an engineer squad can, its not a bigger threat than a well balanced free squad with sniper, assaulter and radiomen.
Don´t get me wrong, Im happy that they are not over powered, but they don´t need to be nerfed either.
STG45 and AS-44 are arguably the most p2w squads since those do perform well over all, but still not an issue when you have Fg42 and AVT40.

3 Likes

Coming from people who spent way too much and might argue its to defend consoom toys.

There is literally no sensible reason why I should defend something like this from people who see it as an incredible problem.
Because their opinion simply isn’t important. Literally nothing is going to change, they’re just creating a toxic environment.

They don’t stop being frustrated, but since they have literally no influence, no one cares. There will always be enough live targets in the form of casuals. And people like me will keep enjoying this game.

It’s just these sad people who will keep mentally hurting themselves while creating fake dramas that has only of value to them and only them. It doesn’t matter to anyone else. At best, they’re just similarly annoying as flies. That’s their power here.

Well. Looking at the numbers and the merge and the bundle removal, its not that fake.

2 Likes

Next premium sniper bundle weapon:
image|e640x507

5 Likes

agree with u