PPSH-41 (S) shouldn't be a TT weapon

[Chris_Vector]

@OggeKing

soundmod then

I have gone through the trouble of making my own mod… and the ppsh has my fav sounds. It sounds soo berfy and I dont want to stop hearing that…

[S-G-44]

@JIMMY_BERETTA-psn

Why should they support it? In the end, no matter how many people complain, they’re going to introduce them anyway. Because, as I said, none of us are “ambassadors for the player base.”

well we cannot make it to be removed but we can actually make its introduction but with no silencer or have nerfed statdistic just like hino rifle which was supposed to be on br4 but it was moved to br 3 so yea we can change the fact it will be introduced but we can change how it will perform

[GiltBurrito7238-live]

They could’ve just added a Soviet Guerilla squad to go along with the British and German one and all this could’ve been avoided

[JIMMY_BERETTA-psn]

SG……The discussion is about implementing it in the game, not adjusting it. Stick to the topic of the post. What happens after the weapon is added to the game is not relevant to me.

@S-G-44

with no silencer

…… I don’t know whether to laugh or cry lmao

[S-G-44]

@JIMMY_BERETTA-psn

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry lmao

-Lol? That was just a ramdom/vague comment to beggin with

-Obviously Even before it’s introduction any change to this gun can be made

@JIMMY_BERETTA-psn

The discussion is about implementing it in the game, not adjusting it. Stick to the topic of the post. What happens after the weapon is added to the game is not relevant to me.

and when it comes to this sentence you are nothing but typing nonsense to beggin with I cleary said that changes can be made before its introduction just like what happened to BP Hino Rifle which was moved from its br BEFORE the release of the BP and you are saying that my argument focus after the introduction of this weapon

obviously we cannot change the fact it will be added or maybe yes? : P ( But i mostly think that it will be added with some kind of nerf at least)

@Euthymia07-live

As I already wrote, we forwarded this concern

@Euthymia07-live

While it’s extremely unlikely that it will get changed, we’ll still let devs know

[JIMMY_BERETTA-psn]

@S-G-44

-Lol? That was just a ramdom/vague comment to beggin with

@S-G-44

we can actually make its introduction but with no silencer

What would a silenced PPSH-41 be without a silencer?

@S-G-44

and when it comes to this sentence you are nothing but typing nonsense to beggin with I cleary said that changes can be made before its introduction just like what happened to BP Hino Rifle which was moved from its br BEFORE the release of the BP and you are saying that my argument focus after the introduction of this weapon

This entire post is about the “non-implementation of the weapon in the TT” And my comments are about why it should be implemented, no one is talking about what you say. → not about what changes could be made to it or what BR has or should have.

Get off your high horse and read what you write.

[S-G-44]

@JIMMY_BERETTA-psn

no one is talking about what you say. → not about what changes could be made to it or what BR has or should have.

Get off your high horse and read what you write.

and since the beggining i was exposing my personal opinion that is what i mentioned above who da hell is gonna tell me what to think/opin? who says that my posts must be 100% always related to the topic nonsense to beggin with

if someone needs to get off its high horse is you and SEE that all this disscusion was spining around my personal view that PPSH (S) can be introduced but since is a free Silenced weapon it must have a certain disaventage like high recoil or dispersion

[Chris_Vector]

They also could have put the sawn off carbine in a Japanese partisan squad