Our Roadmap

I question the validity of a website that says there was a monthly player base of 2.5million for this game at any point in time.

shrug you do you. All I can point to is all the expensive positive changes they’ve made to the game since the merger.

I also vastly prefer the post merger game to the pre merger game.

I guess we’ll see. nobody actually knows what their profitability looks like.

I want to shut down vehicle cycling abuse committed by premium accounts. You want to potentially deny one of the main parts of the Enlisted experience for players playing Enlisted for the first time. These two are not the same.

Yet the road map has no plans for this, but you are A-OK with punishing deserters who don’t want to receive a curb stomp because it’s “for the health of the game.” Do you see the issue with that?

I’d assume that’s an ongoing thing. As we provide feedback, QOL

It’d be much less of a curb stomp if you people would grow a pair and fight it out. A full team stands a significantly better chance than 3 people and a load of bots after the “teammates” those poor saps got stuck with decided “nah, f all of you I don’t wanna” and left the match. I have no respect for anyone who willingly abandons their teammates on the regular. You’re all a waste of a valuable slot and should have just never queued in the first place so someone who’s actually worth something to the team can join instead. Because guess what? 10-12 players can beat a squad if everyone does what they’re supposed to, but no one in this entire game can solo win against any proper team. You can carry, sure as crap you can HARD carry, but you NEED A TEAM to win. It’s a TEAM GAME. And I can’t WIN or even have a bit of FUN if I HAVE NO TEAM BECAUSE THEY ALL DESERT AFTER CHOOSING TO QUEUE INTO A MATCH IN THE FIRST PLACE
Either play, or don’t. I genuinely don’t care which

3 Likes

Mans didn’t play US 2 weeks after Merge. Nor for the past how many months?

Plugging my suggestion in:

There’d be no more unbalanced bot filled teams. Really. Even after some deserted.

2 Likes

@EngelbertzTV_UwU - "AP mine spam and a mess of explosiv spam "

True. AP mine spammers and Artillery spammers are a massive problem. I think that there needs to be a limit or a longer cooldown on artillery attacks. I don’t know about the Anti Personnel mine problem though.

I just put my response in to it. Might be a bit aggressive sounding. Just tired of people with no sense of loyalty and duty to their team to stick out a bad match. Ain’t that hard to just finish it and move on

1 Like

I have yet to hear a solution I think will be good. (Remembered some I kinda liked after typing this)
Limiting them to a single class, eehh don’t like it but might be an option

Limiting how many you can place, absolutely not. I’m not gonna place down 3 that somehow never get tripped and then never get to place down any more for the entirety of the rest of the match

Giving Engies the ability, or a perk, to see and maybe disable them, this I’m for. Although you’d have to unbuff the German ones since they are underground for whatever unholy reason

Some basic ideas to balance them would probably be to increase deployment time. No near instant dropping. Needs an arming animation and whatnot. That and increase the radius that they destroy each other with. That way placing 20 of them in the same room isn’t viable because one goes off and sets off a chain reaction cleaning the entire room

1 Like

Yes I am OK with it, both of those things help the game, one will just come sooner than the other. Punishing deserters is a must for this game, no matter how small the punishment is it should be there.

Hopefully the vehicle spam is solved before the end of this year, either by time limits or spawn points.

1 Like

Punish the preemie abusers!

130421 Savoia Cavalleria_0

8 Likes

Add Asia server.

2 Likes

Okay…im awake now and read again.


AT guns:

New AT guns are cool, but what about scaling by BR?

37mm, 46mm, 47mm, 50mm, 57mm, 75mm, etc etc

75mm guns shouldnt really be BR 1


New class has me interested. Im Hoping an Officer with some kind of strategic shaping of the battle, commanding strong AI


New Frontline? What do you mean? New theatre? Heres hoping Early War France or the Defence of Italy


The rest I personally didnt find interesting. Loot boxes in warthunder are horrid because the chance is near 0.


What about:

  • Improving customisation? Vehicles (dynamic) and infantry?

This is a really big part of growing attached to your squads and vehicles. People love this stuff

  • Expanding Sub factions as sub trees for existing Nations.

  • Airfields

This addresses many of the current issues that remain untouched since merge. Pacific airspawn imbalance, suicide bomb cycling etc etc. The answer isnt making AA op, its the introduction of a delay mechanic.

And many others

5 Likes

Should’ve changed the silver earning ratio
Would’ve been much much better.

4 Likes

Yes! sounds good boys!

Hahaha we can only hope

1 Like

Global chat would be wild though, like old mw2 style wild.

I agree that low BR should have their own AT guns too (Higher armor tanks like the Matilda are kinda pointless). Officer would be interesting, I really really hope its not some sort of dumb “saboteur” or “commando” class that can get into the grayzone, it exists for a reason. There’s a discord Q&A, I would ask your most pressing question there.

1 Like

:face_with_monocle: :flushed: :flushed: :flushed: Cavalry! Yes! Gib

1 Like