New currency

Question.

Will be the XP of multiple theatres sum in the same nation?

There is a difference between gear/ equipment whatever and gameplay.

And the weapons don’t behave realistically. So that is a fallacy already. Now, assuming the weapons are “realistic” Do they need to be only what people actually used? Because if that was the case America would just ROFLSTOMP as they have widespread Garands, BAR’s, and Thompsons, and everyone else has some bolties and a handful of better MMG’s. USA would also have HMG’s nobody else would. Even further along, if we really want to get real, USA/Britain would be the only country with air support.

Now, I know I am taking this to an extreme, but the point is, that this line is going to be different for everyone. As long as the weapons actually existed, the uniforms are consistent within themselves (not by Era but how the uniform is accurate for what it is), reaching any further becomes an impossible Tic Tac Toe match.

Stats and class restrictions are still not connected to the fact that certain guns are zombies or time traveller which is in violation of historical accurcay/ what the devs once said to advertise with.

4 Likes

And 95% of people don’t care. Because not doing so makes unbalanced gameplay.
I’m not saying you aren’t allowed to not like it. But, it’s a smart move and will make the game better. Objectively. Super realistic stuff is always niche

I am not arguing about who or not is caring nor wheter it is right or wrong for the overall game strategy here (though I think its still scumy with the whole fake advertisment thing).

Not untrue but I guess the Jumbo didnt make things better I guess.

2 Likes

Bowing to the absolute historical accuracy will turn your game into a boring mess that nobody would want to play. Remember those ww1 games i guess nobody does now they were way more authentic than Enlisted ever was and yet nobody play them because they are not fun. Full HA = Death of the game, there need to be some compromise, otherwise you will be playing only with bolties, mp40 or ppsh-41 without ammo or with drum that is not matching your gun. So fun…

JDXbo3VLvW

2 Likes

You realize that Milsim is more than those 3 games? And you do realize that realistic is not about the look of it?

Enlisted doesn’t even have historical authenticity

1 Like

You do realise that you can’t find a milsim that is played more than regular shooters. By an order of magnitude right?

Realism is a dead argument. You can keep opining if you want, you can go hang out with the 5 people who play Hell Let Loose. And the sweaty wannabe’s on Squad.

Rn many people also dont want to play Enlisted.

1 Like

My point is you don’t need to be milsim to be realistic

Battlebit Remastered despite being blocky look FPS, it has its realistic things like bandaging, merging ammo and bleeding

You can have realistic in RTS, such as Steel Division (specially with Army General)

You can have a fricking game that use all the WWII skin and doesn’t feels like a WWII game such as CoD Vanguard and BFV, Enlisted is on the way to those

1 Like

It’s always the goddamn same morons who are absolutely clueless and have no idea about game management and no idea about game mechanics, fail completely set vision and can’t creatively solve problems at all.
Jeus christ you stupid logic is boring by now, as in example;
This Gun doesn’t behave EXACTLY like in reality so therefore all game is completely un-historical and there can’t be none. STFU with that dumb flawed logic already, for the love of good.
And just stop it with this dumbass simpleton mathematcis you are trying at and convincing urselves u are smart…
In this case we will get a new economy that is boring, plain, stupid and dull, and be rest assured it’s only for few reason, oversimplifying and have less to manage, make people loose concept of prioze and what they spend.
And bloody ofc you will make less in new system and grind will be more tedious and boring, rest assured of that.
it’s, gaah for real cmon

this is why most people shouldn’t be allowed to vote… political or design philosophy of a bloddy WW2 Squad FPS

We better get a healthy heads up of at least several days before this goes to live. Getting a scent of that typical gaijin-style of anti-player prerogative off this article.

1 Like

When you shake the tree as hard as they are gonna do, you must be specially careful that the monkeys are very well hooked. cause if they arent, they may fall from the tree, and the hit on the ground can be pretty hard.

and once the monkeys fell off, they will get weary of climbing the same tree again, and could go searching for more secure trees.

2 Likes

yes cause having smart arguments is stupid and having feelings is smart… your arguments have absolutely no logic besides writing your subjective opinion…

current economy is shit. ffs i have over 200 silver soldier orders with 2000+ bronze soldier orders even though i dont need soldiers, nor do i need to upgrade large amount of them. but you know what i dont have? i dont have bronze weapon orders to upgrade lots of guns that i want to buy. ffs i even have oversupply of silver weapon orders.

so i would rather have boring and oversimplified economy in which i can decide where my resources go and for them not to be locked behind shitty system that you find fun and complex.

btw how would you like if your boss pays your salary in food orders, clothes orders, tech orders etc. instead of oversimplified hard currency.

2 Likes

Well. I prefer the split between weapons and soldiers since soldiers cost more (in general) and their orders generate in smaller numbers.
Ofc you should be allowed to switch orders from weapon to soldier and vice versa and also be allowed to at least change silver and bronze but despite suggestions devs never looked into that or at least never mentioned it.

1 Like

Chill man, everyone know there is a gamey reason for “unrealistic” things, if this game is focused to be fun and gamey, we wouldn’t have this debacle at all, no, this game is made to milk people wallet, and the Devs has no idea why the playerbase is stagnated and they still put their effort on making new premium and fixing random issue instead of doing things that actually improve the game

if you could switch between them and convert silver to bronze and vice versa then you would be more or less have same effect as new silver currency. so it seems like devs listened, they just implemented their own solution to the proposal…

1 Like

we’ve had a healthy heads up for months that this was going to happen

1 Like

What? People will have StG-44’s in Moscow in this game? It’ll literally be just like BFV and Vanguard