you don’t understand. He wants to be able to plow into the middle of enemy infantry and survive in his STEEL BEAST!
Again, stop with the insulting. You, on the other hand, since (your words) this argumentum has been brought up lot of times have you ever thought for a second that maybe we aren’t all mental and we could have a tiny little be right?
how is he insulting you? are you thinking that maybe tanks will be too op if you make them invincible? (they should ban people like you omg)
clearl
sorry for that but he is right…
Jesus, you guys can’t read at all… I said that they should NERFED in term of throwable range (by making them heavier for example) not deleting them.
Remember: just two tanks vs a load of infantry with AT capabilities
I am feeling sick since the countless time I repeated it…
tanks do the following
- survive bomb blasts
- survive all small arms fire
- survive hits from anti-tank guns
- survive hits from other tanks
- survive flak gun fire
- survive strafing runs from 20 and 37mm cannons
- survive molotovs
- survive PIAT, sturm pistol hits
- survive boat loads of anti-tank rifle hits
What tanks do not do
- survive a bomb being tossed directly underneath or ontop of the engine deck.
Yeah man this is such a problem dude. Can’t you see that???
2 Likes
just look at this shit:
Playing as a tank is impossible because of explosion pack
exscuse me what the ****?
the damage they deal to armor is unrealistic - How a bunch of dinamite stick can destroy a tank when placed near it when a 75 mm HE with probably the double of TNT charge barely scratches the paint from the tank?
75 mm HE and explosion pack is not the same
Right now, apart maybe of berlin campaign, the explosion pack made the bomber class pretty much useless
cringe
In my opinion the explosion pack should give a threat only to wheeled and light vehicles, and to heavier ones just be able to destroy tracks or if placed on the top the engine.
do you even hear yourself?
1 Like
Tanks are so weak and detpacks are so OP that I singlehandedly caused half the axis team to quit and didn’t die once. Yeah Let’s make this situation worse.
(posting it again for posterity)
tanks do the following
- survive bomb blasts
- survive all small arms fire
- survive hits from anti-tank guns
- survive hits from other tanks
- survive flak gun fire
- survive strafing runs from 20 and 37mm cannons
- survive molotovs
- survive PIAT, sturm pistol hits
- survive boat loads of anti-tank rifle hits
What tanks do not do
- survive a bomb being tossed directly underneath or ontop of the engine deck. A bomb that an infantryman has to physically walk up to your vehicle while being exposed to your tank and small arms fire.
Ok, I admit that maybe that didn’t completely made sense, in fact I changed my position. What about shortening it’s throwing range so it’s not just like an overpowered grenade? Maybe increasing its explosive filler and making its max range 3-4 meters should be a good compromise between the risk of getting killed and the tank kill jackpot. Also it could have more anti-fortification purposes.
everyone who would attempted to attack a tank would need to approach tank too close - he would be placed out too easily, not to mention about time it takes for grenade to explode
it explosion pack sticked to the tank or exploded immediattely, like japanese anti tank spear it might actually work, but like this - no
i think its better the way we have now, the soldier who attacks tank has to cook his explosive for ~4 seconds being vulnerable target during this time but at least can stay somewhat more far, in some cover, than right next to the tank - isnt this enough?
Well in my opinion the range should be shortened. Now it’s just an overpowered grenade, while it would make more sense to have a placeable charge.
that charge then should stick to the tank immediattely
Not stick, but act like a satchel. Longer fuse, but more explosive (around 1/2 kgs) and so more threat to the infantryman that carries it because he can’t stay too much near the explosive and so he can shorten the fuze (so it gives the tank the possibility to spot it and escape). Again, this comes with more power so a major threat also vs fortifications.
It’s true btw, why would I bother having a AT gunner in the squad if my entire squad can have AT power, also on medium distances?
lmao, because he has range, just try walking through whole front of many enemy infantry squads to destroy a camping tank, surely your very OP explosive charge will succed in it, woudnt it?
cmon man, why would we add various problems to the game while we have a good and simple solution right now? what is wrong with throwing a fused nade and a tank and booming it? range seems pretty fair
Nah range should be decreased in my opinion. I will give you this similitude.
You are an elephant (tank) vs a thousand wasps (infantrymen with explosive packs). Even if you kill a bunch of them you will be for sure at a point stung to death for sure. Shortening the range would give a balanced risk to the wasps.
lmao “thousand wasps” do you ever play as an infantryman? there are other things to do than to rush one tank
yes, and I see tanks butchered by explosive packs every single time, in maps which there isn’t open ground they don’t literally last 5 minutes.