I’d really love it if those guns were gone but that’s not gonna happen and we’re still not gonna get belt fed MG with 100 rounds for some reason
Oh yeah when the Soviets get that paratroopers it’ll be raining zombie guns too
1 Like
They’re not going to revert.
And I must admit the new systen has benefits such as using PPD-34 or BA-11 after ~2 years of that not making any sense because magical time travelling MKB-42 and PZ IV F2 somehow broke through time-space hole into 1941 Moscow.
So I guess the best way forward is to propose, suggest and nag them.
For example, to lock Stalingrad from BRs 4 and 5.
We welcome anything makes it more user friendly, I don’t want to jus see BR, although that is good change.
On squad selection screen it would be good to understand if Rifleman,LMG 2 squad, or doesn’t that matter any more?
One last thing, I only had one medic squad and eachtime I wanted to include in my Low Trier, Medium Tier I had to chan their load out. In the end I bought reising squad for gold, now I have two medic squads for allies, for allies, I could buy two medic squads but they are the same level unlike allied (unless we can down tier them? By puttin lower BR weapons)
Also some better Tier 3 matchmaking rules please!
I don’t see why German BR4-5 can’t be just Berlin and Normandy without poor old Stalingrad.
And later down the road they add Konigsberg, Vienna, Ardennes, Bastogne, etc.
If you care about time traveling weapons what about undead weapons
Actually they just announced Ardennes lol
wdym?
They really need to make BR6 for all of these fantasy weapons
3 Likes
i am for merge like many other players, but even i am leaving negative feedback cause of the way they implemented it.
so you rarely have issues and you play in stack? maybe we should tailor this game for you and your friends… maybe more newbies and bots on enemy team so you can easily bot farm for enjoyable experience.
you had whole year to propose your options. and we had loads of those that were mostly much worse then BR.
this is a pure lie.
normandy was most balanced campaign lately, but year ago it was heavy axis stack.
also seriously berlin and moscow balanced? this is such obviously false statement that i cant even fathom how you can say this with a straight face. i played both moscow allies and berlin allies in last half year. moscow allies was a breeze where i could easily have over 80% WR and berlin allies were frustrating games where i am lucky if i manage to win 30% of the games. so yeah totally balanced and enjoyable (when i am on winning side).
Soviet paratroopers falling from the sky with Fedorov when they could have given them the folding PPSH instead.
7 Likes
Just keep quiet, thank you.
Yes. Many matches looked like this. This is an example of normandy, in moscow I had a win rate of 60% as axis, in berlin it first went sky high over 89% and now slowly declined because many many many soviet mains came back. The stacks ALWAYS will move - even with this new “GREAT” update.
Yeah that’s insane
Unlimited paratroopers in general, falling from the sky in Stalingrad or on top of Reichstag, is insane.
And Fedorov, a WW1 semi-working weapon, is insane x2.
7 Likes
Great idea re: option to disarm soldiers:
Set the the “squad presets” to import not just the squad lineup you saved, but also their soldier and equipment loadout, including by stripping soldiers/equipment from other squads.
I saved a BR1 squad layout for Axis, then a BR5 squad layout for Axis, then tried to switch back to BR1… only to find that it only saved the squads, not their soldiers or equipment, so anything I had used in the BR5 layout had to be stripped and manually re-added to the BR1 layout. This is a huge waste of time: When I select a squad preset that I saved, I want it to load those squads with the layouts I saved for them, so I can rapidly switch between layouts and enter new games. For this to happen now, you need to save multiple layouts for each faction, all with completely separate equipment and soldiers - a huge resource drain - or else restock the squads from scratch every time.
5 Likes
since the update I call this game “dress up soldier”. It’s just like dress up barbie, but for boys.
Thing is, I didn’t want to play “dress up soldier” but enlisted…
1 Like
I don’t know I already have it, but I can say for sure its in the beaufighter squad
i say normandy was balanced, you show me one example of where you lost in normandy… oh great…
so we should balance game for stacks? ffs i am talking about solo playing experience, not about stack experience. if you played solo moscow axis you would have 30% WR maybe 40-50% if you are really good.
Well, the improvements we’re looking for aren’t difficult.
There are so many good things about it.
・Weapon model
・AI squad
bad place
・Battle rate system
・The ability to select the battlefield has disappeared.
・Insanely complicated shitty research tree
The bad parts are clear no matter who you ask. Management, please fix these as soon as possible.
1 Like
You called me a liar. I could show you dozens examples. Moscow was balanced (more in favor for allies), normandy was equal - sometimes in axis favour, sometimes and specially after the OP paras in allied favour. My screenshot just was an example of good filled and strong teams (as I said in 3/4 matches). Berlin was a PAIN for axis in the early stage, but went to an aprox 90% win house later and now slowly became an equal battlefield because many allied/soviet mains came back!
The developers do exact the same thing NOW! When few ppl play BR3 - GUESS WHAT BR THEY ARE FACING! The main part - the so called stack - will play BR5. You will always have the “stack” problem.
BR4 = useless. Totally useless and a WASTE of weapons which were fun before the update.
BR1-2 = obsolete when the players get acces to the first BR3+ weapons.
Only veterans and fans will stay at BR1-2. Or newbies because they get pissed when they face BR5 all the time with their BR3 gear.
1 Like
You complained about your “stacks”.
more anecdotal evidence. that is why data shows clear situation without bias. if you want anecdotal evidence i can give you examples also:
for this game i could be considered skilled player cause i can carry and usually end up in top of the leaderboard. year ago grinded normandy axis with WR >75%, after that had grind in normandy allies with WR ~50% and that is with me deserting pure roflstomps, so it should have been somewhere at ~45%.
this year i played moscow and had over 80% WR, soviet allies i started with 80% WR somewhere around level 10 and it went down to 50% at level 15 with me deserting worst roflstomps (so that is around 30% WR for skilled player). all solo queue and i can hardly see balance.
and why do you think there is negative feedback? also you cant balance game for stack. they are there or not.
yes it is nice to see one stack demolishing another… and in 90% of the games as solo you dont see stacks.
btw how do you disprove data that shows that in last half year berlin had on average 20% more players than allies? and that is mostly of fully grinded axis veterans which isnt shown in the data.
or that tunisia allies had almost 2 players for every 1 axis player?
Here’s my opinion on the update
- i’ll play the daily 20k score for the OP soviet paras soo i can club BR 1 with it.
Otherwise one of THE WORST UPDATES any games has revived.
75% of battles make me want to insta desert (often do soo now rarely did it before)
Its very hard to get high point games anymore and queue times have gotten 5-10x longer than campaigns system somehow.
Immersion while being on the high end in campaigns is now COMPLETELY gone.
80% of weapons/unlucks/vics are useless now.
7 Likes