There was a new one made by @Jade_Stern, so not needed anymore
Although you did say you’ll make a me 410 suggestion, but so far still not there!
1 Like
Is that one not good enough?
Oh and btw you seem to have also missed the topics you requested to be made about the uragan aswell.
2 Likes
It is, but as always the more topics there is regarding a BR suggestion the better
Saw them and wrote it down, just haven’t commented on them yet
So spamming the exact same topic sombody else has already made is better for that kind suggestion?
Got it. I will keep it in mind in the future.
2 Likes
No, it doesn’t deserve a BR change. The ХA wasn’t moved, the Solothurn wasn’t moved either, and this tank shouldn’t be moved either. It literally gets penetrated by any weapon. Only USSR mains who go to low BR for easy farming are talking about moving it.
I expected to see such a ‘smart’ take from [Eva] players, who also want to make the penalty for leaving battles even harsher. This is deliberate sabotage
8 Likes
Keep in mind we’re talking about the Moscow and Tunisia players here so it’s not exactly surprising.
1 Like
They only care if it affects Soviets/Americans as they love abusing most overpowered squads and guns at BR5 (eg Assault engineers with 6x Fedorov Avtomats).
They would never make suggestion to give Germany similar gun at BR5. I’m just surprised that they are still not using RD-44 maybe they will once someone going to wipe their squads few times in a row.
2 Likes
Of course they won’t suggest it. Not only that—on their own Discord servers, they outright say: ‘WE WILL CHANGE THIS TANK’S BR.’ They don’t want balance; they hide behind it to push their own agenda. If you only knew the screeching over buffing the FG 42. This farce needs to keep going, right? Half the people clamoring for USSR buffs are F2P players who refuse to spend a single cent on the game. They couldn’t care less if the game dies—they’ll just jump to the next free project.
5 Likes
Couldn’t have said it better myself and thank you for giving me a face to some of the enemies we are dealing with.
1 Like
Wait have they already confirmed that?
On the forum the helper said they want to wait until it is out but if they already made up their mind them guess that was just a lie…
2 Likes
Not yet, but they’ve pulled this off before. On a Russian forum, a similar topic got 40 likes, and people are upset that it’s not gaining as much traction here. Most likely, the issue was highlighted in Telegram groups and Discord, and they rallied a crowd to come support it. This is a common tactic — trying to get their way through whining. We’re in the minority there, gentlemen, and we’re doing everything we can to hold the line
3 Likes
Killing Germany across the board one step at a time. Who’s gonna keep dev’s sanity and balance in check except us? We are against redditards, discords, telegrams, ru forum and more and their demand is clear make USSR/USA much stronger no matter the cost.
2 Likes
But who cares about me and the 30-40% of players with common sense? We’re not part of their crying forum cult anyway.
You shouldn’t be so absolute 
3 Likes
Lol, it’s so scary and unbalanced, that BR I players can kill it even with a T-60 machine gun…
m2a4 - m1919a4 machine gun
7 Likes
APCs/Trucks can sometimes survive 8x APCBC shells, artillery and a demo pack.
German TD instantly dies to a 7.62mm rounds.
Nice one Gaijin
4 Likes
APC survive cause they lack ammo rack. that is why i think that APC should me more easily killable(e.g. die with disabling engine).
7 Likes
Plus crew since most tank kills occur by killing the crew.
1 Like
i wouldnt put crew as kill cause APC is basically rally point. imagine rally point getting destroyed by killing engineer who built it.
2 Likes
Well, at least a rally can be destroyed by a buttstock hit.
I think if you manage to kill an entire squad who spawned into the truck and didnt leave should result in its destruction since the spawn is compromised and killing an entire squad within mere seconds in a APC is kinda unique.
1 Like
@coldestwinters made one.
*edit: sorry, i saw you said you have seen it. Ok I will make another one to back him up