4 Likes
What is this?
1 Like
WW1 MG - Parabellum MG 14/17
Could be a cool counter against Sovietās Maxim with option to take off the scope.
3 Likes
if you looked at the screen shot i took of chatgpt it had publications that it sourced, itās not an end all be all but a good starting point
read other comments I had with other people where we hash things out
Iām not gonna respond to you because you dont actually want to have a conversation you just want to be shitty
Yeah And you should actually read it and not just quote the shortcut from an dumb bot before posting it. Sourcing and then posting.
And even the dumb bot says āstatic defensive positionsā, which is essentially tripods.
A) Why even respond in the first place?
B) You already had to impress us with how wrong American cliches are to at least three or four people so might as well say that the ship is sailed at this point.
C) What would Kennedy do?
2 Likes
It would blow your mind for sure.
5 Likes
Forget what I wrote earlier - just know this:
Using Chat GPT like you just did is weird and probably the first time someone did it here.
So we are naturally skeptical about your ideas - also thinking a very arguably overpowered MG should become a premium squad doesnāt really make you more credible.
And can someone also tell me, that, even if we remove it from the tripod, how the sights will make this gun better? It will probably block my vision better than the Tesla bots. What is the point of an scope for machine guns in Enllisted with awful dispersion?
I want another anti-tank rifle with scope, ZIF-11
This comment probably wont age well
why wouldnt it age well?
- chatgpt is known to hallucinate facts and/or sources
Canada lawyer under fire for submitting fake cases created by AI chatbot | Canada | The Guardian - OP squads being premium only is bad case for moving game towards p2w.
Because Iām sure people at one point of time said you shouldnt use google to look things up either, give it a couple years
Also thatās not a great comparison you made about the lawyer, like Iām literally just making suggestions for a game that will probably never get implemented, not representing someone in the court of law
I get where youāre coming from, but do I really need to do a Thesis on my suggestion before I post it on here? lol cut me some slack bro Iām just trying to contribute
that was only said about wikipedia. correct way to use wikipedia is not to quote things from it, but to check info where information you want can be found in and then actually check things from source.
chatgpt can hallucinate results depending on your previous queries. so if you ask him to provide you with sources they may or may not be true and that is why i provided article about lawyer providing fake cases for case law that she quoted from chatgpt.
you have archive.org where you can find loads of books and you can borrow and fact check things
actually yes. you need to quote exact sources if you want anything added, or at least pictures from that period.
1 Like
btw just reason why i have to suspect accuracy of GPT
source quoted is here
and here is table of contet
here is TOC from the book
i kinda doubt it that you will find info about browning scope in weapon development in the soviet union and her satellites. although it could be in part 6, but i doubt it cause of volume 3.
btw here is vol 2
1 Like
Will be 100 times better a bug fix not more monetization thank Youš
Couldnāt agree more, but more monetization = more money to pay more and better devs to work out the bugs
No I totally agree on ChatGPTs accuracy,
I just didnāt have the tools to fact-check it until you gave me that link,
but Iāll make sure to verify and cite things before I post them going forward
DF have enough money for fixing the Bugs but as all the companies they just want more money because yes whitout any reason SO pls stop promoting more ideas about monetization thank You 
Thanks for your 2 cents but Iāll keep posting what I feel like posting.
Iāll try to make em better and more well researched, but Iām not gonna stop sharing ideas if I have em.