To me the heavy weapon line is strange. feels like th devs just put every non-mg heavy weapon and arrange them in a line. I dont know if its proper and I dont know if these things should be listed like this. For example the mortars can be canceled and give radio guys the ability to call mortar srike as early tier artilary strike. And I think it might be proper to give each kind of weapon their own page like how airforce tank and boats are shown in WT. So my idea is light personal weapon(the guns). heavy and special equipments(at rifles, personal at luncher, flamethrower, buildable mg,hmg,at gun, different shapes of structure. different kinds of support weapon called by radio man) tanks and aircrafts.
It is surprise to see that t34stz still in the table
This is a proposal related to semi-auto. Semi-autos in the current game are things that have a pretty big gap between each other. For example, the performance difference between the M1 Carbine and the M1 Garand cannot be ignored. So are the G41 and G43.
Compared to the current random spread system and bolt action, there are considerably fewer people using these due to their ambiguous deal performance.
In order to place them in the higher tiers, you need to at least give them a clear edge over bolt action. Bolt action damage needs to be rebalanced.
The reason why semi-autos are currently losing the fight against bolt action is because of the superior range and damage that bolt action has. The bullet spread is also severe, but there are many cases where you do not faint even when hit, and there are many cases where you do not die instantly. At least improve the current state and place it at a higher rank. Or create additional trees branching from the ‘rifle’ tree. Currently, they see no reason to go higher ranks.
3 Likes
Why is no one asking about this, where was this posted? Does that mean we get progression in customs, so if I chose campaigns like now, will I be able to earn XP?
@ChuchaDrucha Hi, sorry this was your post, does this still apply XP?
As for Table, I’ll leave others to feedback, BAs should be up to Tier 4 imho, they are not as good as SA.
Some premium levels are questionable to me, but I’m sure they’ll change.
Now, please fix my squad respawning since the latest update, so I can quick swap as before 
3 Likes
Manipulation of tactical and technical data of weapons is also not a solution.
It’s better to raise the difficulty level and some limiter as to the troops, that if I have 10 slots, I can’t field 4 assault teams.
Because at the moment in Berlin there will be only automatic weapons, and in Moscow between the wars and from the end of the war, because the Germans at the end of the war produced junk.
2 Likes
Where is Gew98 with scope mount? It’s the best bolt action sniper riffle with huge damage.
The game departs from the historical realities we paid for in CBT and goes towards nonja warriors with assault weapons straight from CoD.
4 Likes
The US also currently has no tanks at all at Tier 10. However, the equipment has 10 tiers. To close the gap in tanks, you need to come up with the right equipment, at least with a 90mm gun. You will definitely need the M36 Jackson or M26 Pershing. Gear gaps at higher tiers will directly affect your chances of winning.
1 Like
it is kind of compromise, one couldnt have everything so I’d rather have nerfed mkb42 in stalingrad than historical mkb42 only in berlin, thats my point.
1 Like
The SA are even at higher level lol.
Is Kar98k Kriegsmodell from Berlin being removed?
I don’t see it on the sheet.
1 Like
A compromise, and not to make the game p2w and not to introduce economic mechanics.
You can always set the number of weapon points and so that when entering Stalingrad or Berlin you can’t put up amy assault troops.
Or actually set a limit for each troop category and even with 10 slots you can’t deploy more than 2 assault squads.
And maintain the ability to use weapons adequately to the theater of operations.
Because the weapons from the beginning of the war were not thrown away at the end, but were still used.
3 Likes
federov before ppsh;
fg42 and 422 in one br;
mp43 and stg in one br;
m38/42 and m38 in one br;
m2 carbine and 1919 vs. fg422 and stg44？
toz at br4?
jumbo vs. panther?
bar A1 and A2 in one br?
Also semi autos at br7 (mostly br8)?
Axis have riders, para and phos while soveit have none.
This ranking makes me feel bad.
nobody will play the earlier version if a later version is placed next to it in same br.
10 Likes
One thing I would change is to include an Italian assaulter squad, since there’s literally 6 Italian SMGs in the tech tree.
3 Likes
checks out. it is a shit weapon.
what is wrong with giving shit weapons lower tier even if they are end of war weapons? this is just pure strength of weapon. it doesnt make any sense after unlocking stg44 to unlock mp3008 cause it is downgrade to everything stg44 is.
also they said they will give soft BR MM and historical MM if possible. so if someone has mp3008 equipped he will probably play berlin maps with other people that have low tier weapons.
they said if they will include soft historical MM. that means if MM allows mp3008 will appear only in berlin.
this is seriously retarded. it would mean that mp3008 would have higher BR than stg44.
unlike now where you get them from start?
4 Likes
You’ll still have all the legacy Italian squads, plus they should still become their own faction eventually.
1 Like
Personally, I think it would be beneficial to provide more tech tree options in the early tiers or introduce the fold system implemented in War Thunder. The current tier system has a wide range of tiers compared to the performance differences among weapons of specific categories. It would be better to narrow down this range, and I believe it is especially important to expedite the introduction of semi-automatic rifles. There may be differing opinions, but personally, I think the initial semi-automatic rifles have been assigned to tiers that are too high compared to their performance. Additionally, compressing the early to mid-tier range and then widening the tier intervals for high-performance automatic weapons in the later tiers while achieving more granularity would be desirable, in my opinion.
3 Likes
personally i would put SMG starting at tier 3 just to have some bolt purism at tier 1 and 2.
4 Likes
then what?battle rating is supposed to be used to divide battle grounds, not the performance, mr. smart
1 Like
Plus BS (bulls*** and bias) from WT.