agreed.
lets see how this will unfold
Maybe it might be time to increase the f2p player options. Add another slot of infantry or vehicle to use? Maybe once a month give them 3 days premium xp or something.
1 Like
I do wish we could get a response from the devs. Just a âhey we are reading feedbackâ. Been quiet for 4 days
4 Likes
You must be new here. Some of us came from War Thunder. Just hope they apply lube before the update. Thatâs all we can hope for at this point.
1 Like
US gets lanchester at lv 4, which is better in terms of everything except the mag size than the mp28
Donât worry, theyâre are certainly aware of our feedback. Helpers are constantly informing them.
3 Likes
We read every post and forwarded a lot of suggestions/feedback:)
3 Likes
You are just too stupid, I give up. You just donât get it, no point arguing with you people. goddamn you must look dumb with that box on ur head.
1 Like
Could say exactly same.
Anyway you always have custom games.
Bro, for the last time, historical accuracy is not the reason for the failures of the game, lmao.
It could be the separated tech tree, the fact that they never allowed you to select to queue for more than on campaign, the AI being dumb/braindead, the mounting system being broke, severe difference between what a paying player gets vs a free player, the grind to get gear that could actually put a chance up against other higher level players, the fire/white phosphorus going through walls, the fact that every time a dev fixes something it soon breaks after, or the fact that it takes months if not years for the devs to actually focus on fixing something that the community has complained about, etc.
4 Likes
This is the point I do not understand from them. They claim the playerbase is low and they want more players. The methods they use are distasteful to a portion of the community, so what do they do? âIf you donât like what weâre doing, just leave!â
3 Likes
You are aware that they did officially say that the MP 3008 could appear in early war maps. Which is why they made the emphases on âsoftâ rule, plus they havenât said anything since this news post regarding that to clarify how it would work.
Well you can start off by naming a single historically accurated FPS game that exactly aims for HA and has actually massive playerbase something comparable to BF / COD style arcade games.
Yeah, its quite niche genre.
Ah yes, lets make this new matchmake that unifies players but lets make 10 different queâs & tech trees because that definitely will solve the issue.
Since theres noway of pleasing each and one of you 10 people that are constantly asking for HA that unfortunately is not possible in new matchmake that aims for balanced & populated games.
They gave you option of custom games that will be worked on where each of your ten ( 10 ) different visions of HA can be achieved.
They aint kicking you anywhere, its simply impossible to please each one of your very least 10 different views of HA.
So in customs you can create what ever the HA vision you have.
And since how you speak about this âHAâ community apparently its âbigâ definitely not minority according to some of you HA people, id say it shouldnt be a problem of anykind to keep your custom HAâs populated 24/7.
Just for reminder, it doesnât mean an arcade game MUST could âhas actually massive playerbase something comparable to BF / CODâ.
1 Like
Lmao, so thatâs why. You developed such a hatred of these people wanting to both preserve certain game systems, and improve/better them in the way they desire, that you believe this is what is making the game fail (despite it being the literal advertisement attracting people still) instead of the actual in game problems and the dwindling reputation of the devs being able to both fix and handle the game.
3 Likes
like thereâs hundreds of people against it.
Obviously, when game is shit regardless of genre it wont have players.
Point is theres alot bigger market for arcade games and audience for it than theres to HA games.
Yet I see only few of you here ?
yeah thatâs right. but that still not means Enlisted MUST could attract those players more, so donât act like thatâs the only right solution, there are different possibilities. plus⌠enlistedlized or gaijinlized HA is not what you have in your mind, itâs well discussed before.
in fact the active ppl on your side is also not more than 10.
I donât want to argue about anything, just a warm reminder, we are on the same boat trying to keep this game alive. so weâd better not diss each other, just focus on the views themselves will be much better.
Sure we dont know, but we know for sure the current type aint attracting people, otherwise they wouldnt have done these drastic measures.
One of my exact points, what is the actual HA you people are even looking at ? All I see is dozens of different views and sure as hell its not possible to make different matchmake que for each one.
Especiatly considering the fact that theyr unifying all the campaigns to get much as possible ppl to same que to get populated & balanced games.
Even in that sense more than 1 matchmake doesnt exactly make any sense.
But the game is going to direction I prefer so I dont exactly need to prove theres thousands of people sharing my opinion.
This is exactly where our opinions differ. In current state aka âtimeline HAâ the game aint going anywhere and even less id say it would go with more strict HA.
I remember itâs not only the balance issue, but also the grind difficulties for newbies which made dev do this merge. they are all included in the current type. well, you think the previous one charges and I think itâs the follower one.
we already had made something in common after these daysâ communicate on the forum, I mean, those
whom you mentioned.