Well the other road in moscow for example would be nerfing soviet equipment to equal level of germuts to achieve balance.
at 26 lvl ? If I recall you get the ppsh and germuts get m38 with 20 rounds.
So to keep this entirely as hypothesis are we going to increase ppsh recoil about by 70% so both guns are “equal” ?
Or will we just increase the random dispersion of ppsh to decrease its accuracy to ~10-20% so both guns have somewhat similar TTK ?
I wonder which will make more people quit, this massive nerfing or the fact that they ditch HA that never existed.
i am not against HA. i would even welcome it. i am for every reasonable suggestion that can bring HA in this game. but not if the price for that would be more bots or unbalanced matches.
globally difference is very small.
this is data from some 8-9 days of battles for crossplay on
they will introduce bonus for join any and if only ~5% of people select join any you could have perfect balance on average.
Again, you are very naive if you think it will be all fun and giggles and that the MM will be all good. I don’t think I need to add anything more, you’ll keep insisting that “it is possible” without asking yourself if you truly expect what effectively is a Gaijin outsourcer to implement this perfect MM you think they’ll implement. Reality is that they’ll implement MM based on Tiers, not individual weapons (and even then, with your theory, a match full of PPD-34s and T-26s would get a Berlin match because “1 person in the opposing German team is using an MP3008”, which is ALSO complete fiction (and not the “Panzer IV F2 came 5 months after Battle of Moscow ended” kind of fiction, but “Tiger IIs in Moscow” kind of fiction, I’m talking about YEARS of anachronical fiction)).
All what historical accuracy defenders (that re left in the game) want, is for the current level of historical accuracy to not be thrown out of the window. It is already anachronical to get the Panzer IV F2 in Moscow, but it isn’t too far from when it ended and serves as a patch to the Soviet armor dominance in that war theatre. Just like we don’t want Tiger IIs in Moscow, we don’t want Volkstrum weapons in Moscow, it is basically the same (a 1945 weapon in a 1941 battle).
Going by your latest comment, I think this kind of heated discussion isn’t warranted and we have more in common than we realize. If I’ve been rude, I apologize. But I genuinely advice you to be more skeptical of Darkflow. If all they came with after several months is a terrible 10-Tier linear mess, I don’t think they can be trusted all that much.
i am skeptical about DF. i have seen their incompetence too many times. but even i am having trouble to believe that they will f*** up implementation of MM so badly.
data manipulation is one of the easiest parts of the programming.
I am seriously worried about different squads of different faction with their uniforms n weapons ending up in wrong campaigns and all ounce of immersion gone.
I foresee Italian against US in normandy using 1941 gear, it will be a mess.
Just wait till they realize they need to loosen up that ‘‘soft’’ rule even more
really? you think custom games is how should be handled.
Custom games should be for group of friends making specific match rules on map for some kind of fun personal event.
Not the premise of the game.
I’ve seen you write before, same lvl of logic like the rest of know it all statistical analyst expert godmode PvPer.
laughable
Now, let’s think there mr smart, is that even remotely believable? huh? we know how history played out.
Is it really realistic to believe that could’ve happened? no
Is it somewhat believable a Pz IV with the long barrel could have been pressed into service in 1941, yeah kinda, and then you add for balance issue to counter T-34 and voila yes that is a good balance of historical and what if to make good gameplay.
fcking hell kid get outta ur stupid box you built of ur bullshit statistics theory that explains fck all
