We sure did see it. But the detail of the “soft rule” wasn’t clarified, not wirtten in the latest news, so we have the right not to trust and rely on it 100%.
Yeah, I also thought about if we improve this soft rule, could it be possible? Keep this version of the tech tree design, and add icon like T, P, M, S, B (for each campaign, or it could be more simplized, but the latest one is decisive ) on the right corner of each weapon, to show what battlefield will this weapon bing you to , might could be a good idea which could please both side of the players.
Till now, I didn’t find any equipments might conflict with, but it will
surely make the matchmaking double-checked, which is more complex and must take longer time (which means we must make the “soft rule” a “hard rule” or it is non-sence cuz it could be softer than cheese, if there’s no “enough” players, while the “enough” is also unclear);
even if it could solve the lower br late weapon’s problem, the higher br early weapon, like ppsh-41, might still don’t have the oppotunity to join Moscow since it’s top-tiered and axis don’t have weapon at same br and same situation, this problem is which annoys me at the first time.
And I would mention, the banlance problem isn’t located in the weapon 100%. I agree it will improve the banlance (I never deny it), but the game mechanicsm is the main factor, so that I would insist not to sacrife HA (whether you admit or not, a currently feature of enlisted) for the minor one. Even if you keep using offensive word on me instead of my idea like what you did at the first place (which is not a good way to discuss), you won’t change my mind but drive me mad.
By the way, if we are talking about balancing fully-automatic and semi-automatic weapons, there is another way: to limit amount of this weapons in squads. For example: 1 submachinegun, 1 machinegun, 1 fully-automatic rilfe, 2 semi-automatic rifle per squad. Assault and machinegun squads - 3 (or 2) submachineguns (machineguns) per squad without giving them ability to use fully-automatic and semi-automatic rifles. But, unfortunately, developers will not use that system)
‘‘this is not about hyper competitivity, but about preventing extreme seal clubbing and shitty end game meta’’ this is exactly what will happen.
You really have no clue whatsoever you talking about, you really fail to get it
And since MP3008 and VG isn’t whole setup. And since most of your setup. will still suit more moscow than Berlin. I cannot imagine they would put you on Berlin map.
And you still remember your enemies should have low br late war equipment too. Which is kinda hilarious. (Not counting you will get probably downtiered playing against t-34 1941 on Stalingrad map anyway, lol)
I cannot see any alternative universe in which this would work probably, lol.
It’s extremely naive this soft rule will be somwhat relevant. I don’t believe it will work in any way.
well if you did see it than STFU. if after update game puts tiger in moscow then complain and dont whine like spoiled child before it is even implemented. it is possible to easily implement it just by deciding map after MM has found 20 players of suitable tier.
it would be better to just have premade historical squads with their weapons. limiting amount of specific weapons wont do anything cause you can just pick OP weapon and continue shooting
you fail to get it. do you even know experience of a f2p newbie right now?
like i said it is possible to easily implement this. only problem i see with my implementation is lack of 1945 campaigns for USA, but even that can be mitigated by preselecting players with such weapons in soviet queue.
So to put it plain. The game doesn’t have to be perfectly balanced, you can’t have that, how could you when it’s about different factions with different weapons, it can only be somewhat balanced and that okay. And that the matches wasn’t 100% players all time or fastest qeues was okay too, doesn’t have to be fullblown e-sport tournament all day n night.
It was about for an hour or 2 jump into WW2 with your tinkered set of squads and weapons, Make the AI even better and I’d really not care not too much about pwning robihr… really.
But now in their attempt to make queus shorter, max available players and simplify and merge and dumb down the game all they in end will achieve is a watered down boring stale soup of shit and no one cares. Game stagnates and slowly dies off.
It was never the balance, nor the players that was the problem. it’s shareholders who want to see more numbers forcing devs to dillute the game in effort to try up the numbers.
The only thing to attract more and new players is to make good gameplay.
As in wow this game is cool, i’m gonna play that!
That doens’t necessarily mean perfect balance, out of the world graphics nor instant match queues.
But more of a good balance of all with it’s own flavour and uniqueness.
Now This game was a bit unique and had it’s own stuff going, now they messing with that, redoing all concept of game…
I guess we will find out how succesfull it will be…
well if you did see it then STFU. if after update game implements the br sheet then complain and dont whine like spoiled child before it is even implemented.
u just need to accept it all and wait for the lanuch.
what a bloody DFIK!
So let’s say I’m a new player in the new system and I want to play exclusively as Italians. In the squad tech tree there are only two Italian squads: engineer 1 and gunner 1. Is there a way to get Italian soldiers in other classes and other Italian squads like riflemen or assaulters? And what if I didn’t want any Italians in my German squads, will I be forced to use Italian engineers in all my squads until I get engineer II.
Also how will the new cosmetics work for the Italian uniforms? Can I give any German squad soldiers Italian uniforms or are they only usable in Italian squads?
like i said this should be easily implementable without affecting any queue. but then again i have been stumped by their incompetence more than once.
no it wasnt. do you know why players dont play axis tunisia now? cause most of their team is bots and they face full team of human players.
tell me how not wanting to play against stg44 when you are playing with BA is e-sports? or not wanting to play against KT with t60? do you even read that you cant have exact ±0 MM cause we dont have enough players? ffs in peak hours we will have ±4 MM sometimes. let me spell this out for you. when you are T10, you will play against T6. what is esports about that?
do you know why this merge happened? have you seen threads in last 2 years players begging for merge cause they were sick and tired of playing against bots? do you know why people asked for BR MM? cause experience is shit for f2p newbie. why would he stick to this game and playing with BA against AR veterans for months?
imagine making better gameplay by having less seal clubbing with end game weapons?
why cant i penetrate that tank sitting on the hill no matter how much i shoot at it? and he only needs one shot to kill me? ohhh such cool experience. i am gonna play masochism simulator.
yeah it had its stuff going by constantly losing players. do you think this merge would happen if game was gaining players non stop?
unlike HA which they said they will implement and it is pretty easy to implement it, tech tree is more complex issue.
What you fail to see is that once something is put into the game, it is way more difficult to remake it than if it was redone before launch. By the time we “see Tigers in Moscow” tons of people will leave the game, as many already proclaimed they’d do.
Also you really REALLY are naive if you think that each individual weapon will have its on MM. It simply can’t be done. If you have the MP3008 on Tier 2, and all other Tier 2 weapons are from early-war, the MM will put said MP3008 immediately into Moscow, because what the MM looks for first and foremost is pairing same-Tier weapons, then choose maps based on those weapons, which are majority early-war.
Seriously bro, use your brain. Don’t tell people to STFU when you can’t think for yourself what the consequences of what tou are defending will be.
Actually, a good one because I remembered but cant find an answer to a similar question. The fox stated that maybe we can decide the nationality fo new soldiers.
But I guess the sheet is a pretty solid answer as well.
