but in real situations The Thomson’s slow projectile velocity makes it very difficult to fight from a distance, and the Thomson has a very bad iron sight (personal opinion). Another problem is when you shoot the Thomson all the time. You can’t control it because it fires fast. That means it works well at close range. But in the mid-range it’s not very good, and Thomson, if you fire one shot at a time. The accuracy of the gun is meager. Not suitable for medium and long distances Look at the damage without looking at other variables and say that Thomson is better than mp43 ??
mp43 although DPS is the lowest but overall performance if you’ve played this game I’m sure you should know if it’s good or bad.[quote=“Ralin, post:39, topic:45000, full:true”]
Liar. The Thompson m1a1 is one and a half times better at close range and 25-30% better at 100 yards in damage. Now the MP43 has the lowest DPS of any high-level weapon.
[/quote]
but in real situations The Thomson’s slow projectile velocity makes it very difficult to fight from a distance, and the Thomson has a very bad iron sight (personal opinion). Another problem is when you shoot the Thomson all the time. You can’t control it because it fires fast. That means it works well at close range. But in the mid-range it’s not very good, and Thomson, if you fire one shot at a time. The accuracy of the gun is meager. Not suitable for medium and long distances Look at the damage without looking at other variables and say that Thomson is better than mp43 ??
mp43 although DPS is the lowest but overall performance if you’ve played this game I’m sure you should know if it’s good or bad.
Skill issue. Holy sht, play to your advantages not everything has to be fn equal, stop crying about everything. Do you think Allies CAS is equal to Axis CAS, no its not. P47 can literall wipe half the map while p38 at lvl 4 scales really well end game because you get to kill end game axis tanks at pretty low lvl(also on a fighter slot).
Actually, the P-38 G is bugged so that it takes the Attacker slot It’s been like that since last year so I don’t know if the devs are ever going to fix it.
I think it has been like that longer than a year. I remember a dev saying they were gonna fix that bug like 8-10 months ago or around that, still not fixed as expected…
What I would say is that there are different types of guns. But why are they on the same level? For example, if the Germans had a rifle It will unlock at level 12, but the US side also unlocks smgs at level 12, so why are they unlocking at the same level? Of course, the mp43 and Thompson might not be much different. But in the end, these two guns are different types. I don’t know how many more mp43 fanatics I need to talk to. Let them understand (mp43 is assult rifle, Thompson is smg). You said I cry for equality just because mp43 is your favorite gun. So you don’t want it to be deleted or nerfed.
You are supporting the imbalance of the game for your own pleasure.
because if you look at everything objectively Comparing the rifle to an unlocked smg of the same class is unfair.
image from wiki
Then I guess you should go for the nerf m1919, which is better in everything than the mg34, which opens at the same level.
It’s literally better in every characteristic: ammo count, reloading (it’s equal and a second faster than the mg42 with 50 rounds), recoil, dispersion, movement dispersion, rate of fire (no excessive rate of fire inherent to the mg).
This, in your opinion, is not an imbalance?
It’s okay when one side gets something a little better than the other. And vice versa.
A Drum Thompson would be and possibly at 100 rounds, which is absolutely insane. I hope you’ll be in favor of a stg with a drum magazine for balance (I know there is no such thing)? Or do you only bring it up when it’s convenient for you.
No, I just gave the opposite example, which for some reason does not bother anyone. You told the man that because he wants to play with a good gun the mp43 shouldn’t be strong. And for what reason should the m1919 be strong?
Are you adequate? The m1919 is better at everything. It is literally a recoil free weapon that kills with 1 shot at 200 yards and has 100 rounds of ammo with reloads faster or the same as German machine guns.
I get tired of the hypocrisy.
Have you actually played it?
Okay, I admit that the first time I played, I got 200 kills in 1 game, then I felt it was too cheating. And now I don’t feel that way
Let’s start with the disadvantages of the m1919a6.
It has very high recoil when standing and shooting.
This gun is very difficult to shoot. Not because I can’t see But the bullet does not hit the target. There is a 25 percent chance the projectile will hit the target when you aim while walking and if sitting upright. The goal is about 85 percent based on my self-assessment.
The gun is very heavy, heavier than the mg34 and 42, which means it is better suited to defend rather than attack. I’ve never carried a gun this heavy before.
This gun shoots the hip very badly. If it’s not really close, it’s almost certainly not hit.
This gun, to be honest, is a very well balanced gun. (Except the damage, this game’s LMG family of guns deal a lot of damage.) They were made for defense. Especially if you use a semi-automatic gun. If your skill is enough for m1919 user then you will have to beat him in this game from 15 meters or more.
I don’t know if mg42 and 34 when shooting at the target while walking with bullets will hit the target or not. Combined, I think the m1919 will be a bad gun.
the accuracy of the m1919 is 42% higher than that of the mg.
vertical recoil is equal to the mg34, but horizontal recoil is 25% less. However, the m1919 does not shoot very fast, which gives you much better recoil control.
as far as I know the running speed penalty is the same for all machine guns. There is no concept of “so heavy” here
So it makes me laugh to see you say that a gun that is at least 25% better than mg34 in everything is bad.
