First changes to battle ratings

And STILL, THE GAME IS RUNNING AND SERVERS ARE POPULATED

You may like it or not, I can like it or not, but so far facts tell that, commercially, the format DOES WORK.

2 Likes

They never mentioned Steam, could also be epic.
Also a game that on the med and long term loses players is not really the definiton of sustainabe so release wouldnt matter.

Not like Steam would be a great help either consider fees and review bombs.

1 Like

It doesn’t if you played WT you’d know. IF they wana do a warthunder infantry addition they should just make enlisted pve and make a new game.

Your issue with BR relies on HA and please tell me more about the historical accruacy or immersion while I drive my Jumbo in Normandy facing Osttruppen armed eith FG42s.

KV-1 seems fine at tier 3 because of timeline, it’s just the tank is broken and OP because so

I had that misfortune from 2014 to 2021, then luckily I (mostly) detoxified.

Historical Authenticity =/= Historical accuracy

And i prefer to play Moscow, Tunisia, Pacific the campaigns getting murdered and made a joke out of with merge.

6 Likes

??? are you really bad or what bar sucks compairs the fg. even mg 42 is much powerful then this

well enjoy detoxifing from enlisted to when it enters its death spiral with merge.
Only reason some of us testers and OG players supported the game was due to it being unique after merge there will be no reason to play it since authenticity, map selection, decent progression will go out the window and into the trash.

4 Likes

ekhm… Johnson LMG…
also M2 >>>> FG42 in close range

2 Likes

I broke the WT spiral, I’m confident I will be able to break the Enlisted spiral should the need arise.

So far, the worst days I had in Enlisted were still less frustrating than an average day in WT.

3 Likes

Yeah sure…
Name it different and call it ad day I guess.

Play custom battle.

custom battles are fun they just need exp.

Sadly with merge they are killing customs as well they did not work on dev server

1 Like

Ask for rework as announced by them.

That is exactly what i am saying we don’t need a rework (merge) we just need better squad progression.

But hey i hope the mythical ‘‘new players’’ enjoy getting shit on by rifle grenade spam from tripple engi squad runners with maxed out perks at rank 1.

3 Likes

Sounds like one my grind matches in Pacific.
But totall diffferent.

I was looking for custom but sticking to old shitty system that is beyond saving makes more sense I guess.

maybe we dont get new players becose of campain system???

4 Likes

yeh sure that’s the reason not the painfully slow squad grind and most new squads comming with 3 poorly equipt rifleman and 1 ‘‘specialist’’

2 Likes

Hence why they should be foldered and put in BR4, with the Jagdpanzer IV in between them and the Panther (and honestly, it is debatable if the Panther and the Tiger I should switch places, the Tiger I has a flatter armor and long reloads aren’t good in Enlisted, also it would make more sense historically and would make thr Tiger I less obsolete than in BR5 along the Tiger II).

Panther could go up in BR along with Jumbo it would solve issue of Japanese having to fight Jumbo at BR4. Panther has much better pen and also better hull armor while turret armor is the same as Tiger E (actually turret ring has only 82mm of armor which is just pitiful) just give murricans some 76mm tanks in same BR as that Tiger E.

1 Like