Federov to Automatic Rifle

The Federov Avtomat has long been an “assault rifle” but this has always been a clear mistake, it is an automatic rifle. They made the Federov an “assault rifle” because of some arbitrary justifications over the power of its 6.5 Arisaka round and to balance it against the Stgs. However moving the Federov to the Riflemen class would not have any “balance” issues whatsoever. You can literally arm an entire Riflemen squad with them as you can any automatic rifle, and you can still have them in your Assault squads by giving them to the riflemen

The Type Hei is an automatic rifle chambered in 6.5, the Breda PG is an automatic rifle in 6.5, exactly the same as the Federov, and they aren’t mislabeled as assault rifles. So correct the Federov

Remove the Federov from the Assault and properly make it an automatic rifle and move it to the Riflemen class

10 Likes

Ah good ol 6.5 Arisaka

Ironically there have been debates about automatic rifles being moved to Assault instead, so if that ever were to be the Federov would just come right back :sweat_smile:

……but if for the foreseeable now automatic rifles are a Riflemen weapon then the Federov should be rectified. Regardless it is an automatic rifle and it should go where automatic rifles belong

2 Likes

The Breda PG CR (the 4 round burst one) is chambered in 7mm mauser not 6.5 carcano. But I agree with you. Fedorov shoul be a rifle man weapon

2 Likes

The reason people think it’s an assault rifle is because 6.5 arisaka is infamously underpowered for a rifle cartridge

well fedorov doesnt kill in one shot, so it would be a lower dps, smaller magazine Assaultrifle - that however has better effective range like… for example G43K.

I dont see a reason why someone would pick fedorov over AS44.
This could make sense.

1 Like

well the japanese Type hei uses the same ammo - yet one hit kills against vitality, unlike Fedorov

weird balancing

2 Likes

I pick fedorov because its less out of place than the assssss

3 Likes

It’s literally an auto hei with a less shitty sight.

How exactly?

AS is literally WW2 prototype meanwhile Federov is WW1/interwar weapon.

there are certain advantages of fedorov over as44. it is more efficient in killing shit players and bots than as44 cause they usually dont have vitality perk. also there are some combination of shots that you will survive if hit with as44, but not with fedorov.

Only as long as you are the shit player as well.

If you’re automatically aiming for the head, AS is literally superior in every way.
It doesn’t have as much random recoil, it has more comfortable sights, it has more rounds in the magazines, it has a bayonet.

But Fedorov has SF dispersion.
Anyway if they buff Fedorov damge to Type Hei automatic rifle damage than Im all for moving Fedorov to SF.

2 Likes

Yes, that’s quite obvious. That those stats that are artificially designed to accommodate a certain type of weapon should be changed by this reclassification.
Especially dmg and ammo reserve.

The dispersion of both guns is so low that recoil plays a bigger role for me.
AS has literally no recoil with perks. But recoil of Federov is pretty random even with perks. At least from my perspective.

Bizarre fun fact btw, Federov still doesn’t have dispersions on the level of Soviet Thompson 100 or ppsh box.

make sense, I prefer Fedorov because that extra damage and less dispersion makes it a better gun at longer ranges. I can kill people by shooting their arms and legs while they are taking cover.

Use like 20 Fedorovs and 1 AS-44.

1 Like

well i am shit player :stuck_out_tongue: kinda sad what it says about state of the game when i manage to get top spot with infantry in majority of games.

2 Likes

The fact that he can’t control the feds recoil is pretty telling of his skill issue lol.

well okay, not that I am in any way afraid of noobs, but wiping them quick can help fighting the real enemy. So I guess valid point.

Fedorov saw combat - AS is literally an AK 47 prototype.

1 Like

Its true that the AS-44 designes pioneered the AK-47 however there considerable mechanical differences and the different development routes AT-44 (actual predecessor of AK) and AS-44 followed.
Im sure a gun engineer could give a better answer, but Im not one. Though most will agree that they are not related enough.

1 Like