I am very interested to see win % of each faction on both Campaigns.
I like playing the russians very much. One of the factions I am most interested in for the WW2 time period. That being said I REALLY feel like when I do we lose almost every match.
I have seen comments before about the Germans having a high winrate in moscow and was wondering if anyone had the data for faction win % for each campaign?
Isnt that clear that the developer is pro German side?
Especially the two new LMG premium squads. What germans get, what russians get.
Also I wrote several threads about this, they either ignore, or just lock and even HIDE the thread.
Just play german.
Also Darkflow is locate at Latvia. And for Gaijin? See how WTās balance:
(previous version)
We had the win rate for Germany from last campaign but itās pretty outdated (56%l since it was from the start of they year, we donāt know the win rates in normandy and I prefer to never see them. I think the US is doing a bit better tho
Please donĀ“t use my comments while putting them out of context. I wasnĀ“t referring to any particular squad but to the very P2W concept of the current premium squads. I never dared to say that developers are biasing this or that nation, nor I think so.
Sorry, I just want to copy my threadās linkā¦ And it automatically applies your postās address.
Can you not use thunder skill as sauce dudeā¦
Thunder skill is very unreliable and no one should look at it for win rates.
That is true, gaijin keeps actual statistics as a precious secrets.
However as WT player who made it to top tier, it is undeniable that Leopard 2a5-6 (top tier brs) are far superior vehicles above most available MBTs which turned top tier ground matchmaker into the mess.
But at the same time soviets are pretty much ruling aircraft top tier where F4Es are somewhat a competition if they are used by good players, so that doesnĀ“t support Sfhs theory well.
If anything, WT suffers from big three (US/USSR/Germany) problem.
Yeah but at the same time look on the germany win rate at 4.0-5.0 and you can see itās worng they ācontrolā this BRā¦
Low tier is often filled by people who think they are Michael Wittmann reincarnated while playing like morons, so that skews everything a lot (if we ignore modern vehicles such as r3 plaguing low tier)
Alas, that is off topic so I will stop now.
As opposed to Enlisted where low levels think theyāre rambo but have never seen first blood to know what rambo does.
Unlike me, who has seen first blood and think Iām rambo.
@81161750 @sfh0525 @3881562 @8383908
The reason why Germany wins again is mostly because of the MG-30
I am playing Enlisted since september and win rates were never balanced, Germany won a lot because they got better premium equipment but after some time a lot of players joined to the russian side and Russia started having more wins until yesterday when they introduced premium LMGās and everyone bought the MG-30 because itās just far superior
So hereās your answer, Devs want to attract Wehraboos by making this game a wehraboo dream world for limited time
This doesnāt mean devs are pro-German
They just made Germany stronger for limited time so they can get more money for OBT
And Wehraboos are going to pay for pretty much all wunderwaffeās they see and devs are using them in a clever way
Gib kv-1 )))))))
)))))))
Iām working on it 
I feel like I definitely win more in Moscow than I do Normandy.
As which side(s)?
Germoney
never, and ever i heard so much nonsense in this community.
this makes me cringe even moreā¦
like, hearing people complaing about developers that are trying to attract people in the wehrmacht with newer premium squads?
people really lost common sense.
anyway, iāll avoid others comments that really pisses me off written by some 3 years old to be honest, and iāll try to give a proper answer my self.
back in the days, when i started to main both factions ( before the Closed Beta Testing), so that i could give proper feedbacks weather something is and was working, and others werenāt/arenāt. and i can say that russian playerbase has been pissed of for quite a long time due to technicall issues related to guns. not because devs wanted to make german more op, thatās for sure.
insthead, as said before, lots of weapons werenāt working properly. like smg dealing less damage, At rifle useless, insane recoil, and above all hit regs not actually working as intended. for that reason, many people moved to the german side which it was more stable. and by that, we had for a few months the issue of russian players being compleatly outnumbered by real players and putted with matches filled with bots due to the lack of people wanting to play in the russian side. and in the meanwhile, those few players were more thinking about getting killes rather than playing the objective.
at some point, the devs decided to nerf up to 25% of weapons of the axis side.
although, by doing that ( and this nerf is still present up those days ) the soviet win rate didnāt actually improved. until the newer wave of CBTs players. that somewhat sorted this out. but even than, it drastically changed when they added the normandy campaign. many people went there.
it is correct that the newer premium squads favors more the germans than the russians. by no any means the devs want to make germany better. from a honest player, donāt listen who claims germany is better. because itās not.
unlike the soviets, they just play the objective more often, and actually cooperate within each other.
a clear example is the normandy campaign. where most of the matches are tied due to people actually playing as intended by the game. and real battles take places among players with fair numbers rather than one side having more bots like in moscow happens.
i hope this can somewhat answer your question.
cheers.
@73507743 ( just a friendly advice )
if you are about to replay this message, donāt.
i really donāt care as those are my personal and objective as possible thoughts about a complicated subject. nor i really want to discuss with you at the moment.
too late
Now this was just my theory, I was partially joking so donāt take it seriously, it seems I canāt translate sarcasm from my country because most western European states take our sarcasm seriously 
But, it is not impossibleā¦a lot of ww2 fans love wehrmacht equipment so there is 5% chance my joke is what actually happened
This is how business works, itās cruel
Now this makes me sad, I had no idea Pz-2 was nerfed, the main problem with it was the broken damage model, I think devs were too lazy to fix it so they nerfed itās armour. imo Pz-2 didnāt need any nerfs, now itās just useless and I blame devs for it
The main problem with this is that Enlisted has garbage net code so weapons with high RoF tend to have disappearing bullets (I saw MG-42 has this problem too)
Now PPD doesnāt only have bad net code, it also has a very bad shooting sound. The shooting sound makes one bullet feel like firing 4 bullets. How is this a problem? Well, players rely on sound more than they know it. An average Soviet player will think 4 bullets is enough to take an enemy downā¦BUTā¦
ā¦he will not take an enemy down which results into āāoverrating the gunāā by psychology and can end with death (in the game off course)
So just by giving it a better sound will fix the gun by 50%, after that we might see if PPD needs nerfs or buffs
I aināt seen such a thingš
ā¦
i donāt know what to say.
i heard that alot.
iām not being offencive to be honest, my post would have been already flagged if i was. and iām not going to be offencive in any chase. hates brings only other hates. but on a serious note, just like you did yesterday on oxy and mike, what you did there, itās not being funny or productive in a serious matter at all.
i mean, itās a panzer II.
itās meant to be fast and deal with infantry.
occasionally, if got by the flanks, it can kill a t38 due itās firewpower and penetration capability.
i disagree. insthead, i think we actually need proper tanks that can fight each other and balance this matter out. i would like to talk about tanks a bit more, but we canāt. tanks are pretty much in alpha stage due to the normandy campaign. and i donāt feel to give an overhall accurate feedbacks about it. like, itās really hard to tell. weather in moscow they are somewhat stable but still lacks of equivalent.we have to agree to a certain degree that tanks most likely werenāt the same, and as we can see, some are being used differently, in others case, some are being used more than the others. making the balance question more difficult. but considering that the tanks it self are not very functional in terms of armament and balance ( as we still have the t26 and the PZ III B ) itās a complete mess. iām glad that we received newer tanks. butā¦ it does not fix the current problem. and iām afraid it will never be.
weāll have to see what the devs have in mind.
well, most of the german players tends to rush with the tanks. thatās kinda why.
iām afraid this is much debatable. as tanks can archieve victory, but itās not all up to them.
as said before, pz II does not lack of fire power. ( i think ) unfortunally, t28s are more rare than whales but i donāt deny that iām focusing my self in unlocking american squad class type 2.
so iām not really into moscow anymore.
iām a woman.
just call me Erika? simple as that.
ā¦
Erika is my first name,
and Kalkbrenner is my surname.
i even capitalized the E and the K so that people does not make any mistake about it.
but what can i say.
