Winrate is completely dependent on player counts. Everyone saw the Soviet’s winrate spike immensely when Normandy came out and the German mains moved over there, while the Soviet mains stayed. And now, Germany is seeing a massive winrate spike in Moscow because a lot of Germain mains returned to try the MG30, while the Chauchat did not suddenly increase the playerbase that plays as Soviets because everyone that wanted to play as Soviets are already playing Soviets.
And no buff or nerf will ever change what faction people WANT to play. They will only cause to people leaving the game entirely because the faction they WANT to play can no longer compete / isn’t fun to play anymore. Sure, the majority of players will accept the change and keep playing, but you will inevitably only drive more players away from the game if you try to use weapon/whatever balance to balance out a playerbase inbalance.
based on my experience, i saw many egoistic people playing for they interestr rather than cooperationg for the objective.
but i really hope for the soviet players that this has changed and what you are saying, is right.
perhaps i would love to hop on the soviets. but i would lose time for my current mindset about normandy.
i can’t stop you. but you should really start thinking about what’s more important, and how to behave.
just saying that.
i just made an assumption. if you feel guilty or think that it was meant for you, i don’t know what to say.
should i… be… impressed? bothered? it’s none of my buisness what others decide to do.
yep, i was going to adress that regard. but as i said, it’s very messy. and insthead of complaining. it’s been a while that i’m trying to putting things together and suggest something more apropriated.
but here, once again i have to disagree. i don’t think limits should be applied for this regards.
like, i get that is for noob friendly, but not at one matter where people almost go no where because of it.
I have full right to want what I want and my polls have proven I’m not the only one, I just don’t like mirror gameplay, can you take that from me???
I love pushing my suggestions when I get positive feedback for them,
Exactly! We all can give our opinion but it’s always gonna summon backfire (like when I told you sound like devs dog which again I’m sorry for).
I don’t think players will agree with that, I think you want Enlisted to have only light tanks which majority doesn’t want. Tanks can be balanced without being removed, you just have to be creative
You get very rude if someone disagrees with you.
I’m no better but at least I know I can be very toxic
but when things are going that way, you can’t really complain as you pretty much support that.
i don’t know how to say it… but it’s a bit contraddictory. don’t you think?
( speaking of " back fire " )
as said, opinions are opinions. i don’t have much to say. but as said before, i can’t really complaing about something that i wanted to be introduce my self. can i?
that’s good.
they… don’t have to?
never said that i’m afraid.
err… depends for what you mean by being creative. because for balance purpouses, as we saw, a tank has been removed and replaced with another in order to provide balance ( and it did worked even if it was fun using that ). not a big deal if it’s for the good of everyone.
… how?
is this some sort of competition?
i have no interestr in taking part of it to be honest.
yeah because calling him a dog of someone else is very respectable and " softer "… right?..
It was removed because it had no competition plus it never saw use in the battle of Moscow. You seem to mix the asymmetrical balance and asymmetrical unbalance
There are more examples on other topics but they all got flagged and hidden
nope. i’m not mixing things together, i’m just telling you that removing tanks to be replaced with something more suitable did happened and most likely, is a solution.
it only happened twice if have to be honest.
the rest, you can see them for your self ^^.
listen honey, we can stay here all the day showing who is more though than the other. but as i said, it’s not the time nor needed at all, something that i’m not particular interestred in.
i could ping all of your comment as well. but as originally said we are not going anywhere at this pass.
so… i did warned ya.
above all, as i tried to say, balance symetrical or not, must be agreable by everyone with a pince of common sense along side duability for the devs.
something that you are not very sharing that much.
No, no one more thing. “One more thing” was ten “one more things” earlier.
I don’t want to be harsh but if you (both) want to argue then send private messages instead of spamming the forum.
Sorry but with some persons it’s impossible to let go so easily
To get back to the main topic, Win-rate is impossible to balance at current stage of the game
You see, devs use different tactics to attract different players to buy the CBT and they don’t care about win ratio at the moment
When OBT comes out we can talk about team balance more but during CBT I doubt teams will be balanced…ever
I just hope OBT will come soon and without bugs
I don’t want devs to rush the OBT and release it full of bugs
But I also want OBT to come at least in 1 month because we can’t wait another 9 months
Drop it. Personal debates are off-topic and these personal debates do not belong here. If you insist to participate in these personal debates, you are free to bring it to PM so it does not derail the point of this thread. If it continues then further action may need to be taken, so please consider this a warning.
It is entirely within reason and realistic possibility to discuss this topic without getting into personal inflammatory debates with each other. Please explore that option and make it a priority.