Fix would mean it isnt possible at all which it is rn.
Have you head of a concept of light tank?
We will end this lovely conversation tommorow.
Sweat dreams.
no it wouldnât. something being broken does not imply complete non-functionality
yes. you canât just fucking take a currently established tank however, and just remove its armour and make it a flanker like a cruiser tank as you implied. whatever youâre smoking, i want some
At the end its just making it easier to deploy a bipod which sounds more like buffing.
But anyway⌠so what is wrong with âfixingâ bipods then?
no. they are broken in certain spots (i.e. you canât rotate it as much as you should) and you are unable to mount them when you should be. a buff is when you make a change, with the intention of making it more powerful. a fix is when you fix something that either didnât work at all or didnât work as intended. itâs about intention.
if you had bothered to read, there isnât an issue with fixing that. thereâs an issue with nerfing something that was already balanced by making it reliant on this system that already has so many benefits without making you suffer for not using it. all this will do is push people towards SF rifles, taking even more diversity away from the gameâs loadouts (just like the mp43 nerf did)
Well since there are also enough players who like the new system I doubt that all people here see âthisâ in the same way.
Like in Stalingrad where the AVT and the Mkb can only be used by engies and assaulters?
1 Like
Wow. Impressive. Just cause I dont like their opinion they are all stupid.
Luckily you can use so many snipers.
Good idea to run smgs in a campaign where most people prefer bas for obvious reasons.
itâs not that i donât like it (though i dont). itâs that their opinion is stupid
you miss the point this hard or did you practice? the point is class variety, not to spam versions of a single squad multiple times
yeah because the devs made yet another stupid design decision by making you permanently blind if you within 50m of the objective.
1 Like
Doesnt really make you point more smarter thought and people only need this because they think it makes everything better which it doesnt.
At maximium you can âspamâ three sniper squads which also have the lowest amount of squad mates. Not really effective for me compared to a rifle or engineer squad.
Now people also get blinded? Oh. The concussion stuff? Oh yeah. CONSTANTLY.
it does when iâve explained why.
thatâs all you need to play nothing but sniper mkbs. that is the definition of spam, donât know why youâre trying to be funny about it.
Good idea. A fragile squad made for engaging OHK rifles with a lower dmg AR âsniperâ and higher disperson. What could go wrong? Possible that after the first five kills the whole squad got rifled in case it didnt already got killed before it could reach their effective range.
how much have youn played of these squads? mkb snipers are one of the most powerful squads you can haveâŚ
2 Likes
Thatâs called victim blaming lmao.
People are asking to add hardcore mechanics to a casual game. This is as stupid and wrong as possible.
While the same MG42 has a monstrous 0.68 dispersion, it cannot be used as a real machine gun (i.e. for shooting at 100-300 meters, serious enemy suppression).
In this game the weapon does not have the right accuracy, there are no maps of the right size, and there are no missions where it is needed.
The penalty to running speed is already a huge disadvantage of machine guns, because it takes you longer to run to the point. Iâm still against crude scatter mechanics when running, as it should be much more subtle and accurate (the penalty should increase if youâve been running recently, but be quite small if youâve been finding in place and then started crouching to go and shoot).
Also, there are only 3 of them in the machine gun squad vs. 4 guys with SMGs.
With the exception of the m1919, which has almost half the dispersion (0.4) of the âOPâ Mg42, more ammo, faster reloading, lower recoil, and no excessive rate of fire, the other machine guns are far less âmetaâ weapons than the top semi-auto rifles and SMG
Yes, the stamina consumption mechanic along with increased recoil for all weapons should stay in Stalingrad and not see the light of day in other campaigns.
Stalingradâs machine gun is already a very weak thing. In other battles, machine gun is the core equipment of German attack and defense, but in Stalingrad, I abandoned the machine gun team and did not set up machine gunners in other teams
5 Likes
this guy straight up proving the point iâve been making all along
I think what we have now is more realistic, weapons should have some weight simulated into the game based on IRL equivalent instead of weapon class. Fixing the bipods seems like a better solution compared to reverting this change.
No one here is a victim, so itâs not victim blaming
lol. âmuh realismâ argument rears its stupid and ugly head again.
you mean like how these weapons take more stamina when you sprint with them? or how your movement speed was already reduced while the weapons are equipped?
weâre all victims of retarded developers who balance things without playing their own game.
2 Likes
How about a light tank that behaves like a heavy tank. Itâs not doing what itâs supposed to but itâs balanced.
Should we change it? Imo yes. Light tank is a light tank, no matter how balanced it is as a heavy tank.