So you would be ok with this mechanic if we had good bipods.
Yet non of you spam posts about improving bipods. I’ve seen only one, made by @CaptainSebekel .
1 Like
that would be fine. i’ve said this before in a post i made. you can check if you like. but being realistic, they won’t fix it
READ
4 Likes
Ok, two posts. Vs how many “remove it” posts? Sth like one or two just today?
It makles sense if you think about it. THe mounting system has been like this since release, neglected with very minor improvements. It’s all but forgotten about by now, at least in the eyes of the players. SO the most realistic suggestion is to remove.
Has there ever been a precedent when they reverted/changed their plans for such system? I remember after semi auto nerf entire forum was raging but they barely commented on that. At this point all we can is watch this game slowly turn into nerfed and corrupted abandoned project , or whatever vision devs have for it
The only thing I remember them backing out on is the removal of one magazine for the AVT-40.
Now it is back and that weapon is no longer a peashooter. /s
1 Like
I’ll just quote myself.
So I don’t give a fuck that I’ll have to deal with shity bipods for another month, two or half a year. And I’ll be happy that you all will finally take a sit in this hell, right next to me. Because of fuckers that don’t care, we are where we are.
3 Likes
Already was, newbie. Get real.
what? are you insane?
anyway. i’ll tell you why the MG nerf is stupid, once and for all. Because they were already balanced, by only being able to have 3 in a normal squad. compared to a squad full of SF rifles where you can have 9 of them. why change what doesn’t need changing?
also, early - mid level players (who comprise most of the players) on axis will get MGs as their most powerful weapon, and they won’t have SF rifles. so it primarily affects them, causing a migration from axis playerbase. which is already stretched thin due to germany being literally every axis faction in every single campaign. THAT is why MGs did not need to be nerfed - it affects most german players.
It’s not the specific nerf i hate. It’s the idea of nerfing something that didn’t need to be nerfed altogether.
3 Likes
Maybe.
I’m using bipods constantly since day one.
And seing mass of people complaining that they will have to use them for a month or two, is pathetic.
Tere was a lot of time to complain about bipods and improve them, but people didn’t care.
So now enjoy the effects of your ignorance.
1 Like
I’ll tell you a secret, just don’t tell anyone.
After nerfing MGs, you can buff them! Can you believe it?!
1 Like
Devs didn’t care, nor did players. Both are guilty of the current situation.
but then why nerf them in the first place if you’re going to nerf it why would you then suggest to buff it it??? insane person!
Ehh by buffing the bipods then?
To, I don’t know, make them work as intended? Fit the intended role?
For example nerf tank’s armour but increase its mobility so instead of being a head on fighter, it becomes a flanker.
no, that would be ‘fixing them’ a buff is different. that’s balance/design. not functionality.
??? do you not know what a tank is???
Would still buff MGs role efficiency at the end.
no. it would fix them