No aircraft is safe, when I have a Machine gun in my hands. Who needs an AA gun, when you can simply disable the plane’s ability to steer, power loss, fuel loss/ oil loss.
The MG 34 Pet. is by far the best Axis machine gun.
This is how you use the German AT launcher.
Oh. My. God. There’s so many of them!
Even though I was up front with my Tiger tank, and got like 160 kills in one-life… we still lost, because noobs and A.I. don’t know how to push the objective when it’s clear of enemies. Big deal It was still a fun match for me.
Auto-aim is for noobs and low-lifes who require assistance from the A.I. to get a high score.
Same goes for PC hackers and cheaters. Bunch of losers. Skilled players will disable auto-aim
Sometimes, you can hear the enemy before you see them. Sometimes, you can ambush a squad entirely because you hear them making noise.
Teammates don’t know how to defend. We lost the game at the worst moment, when I could I have gotten like 20 kills in 10 seconds with the HMG. But… the match ended.
Even though I do not have harmonization mode turned-on, I noticed this absurdity the other day. They would have done a better job at having nothing at all.
Instead, they replaced the Swastika with half of a Swastika
Have a great weekend
See you sweaty PC players on the battlefield.
Feel free to share your own highlight clips in the thread.
It’s always fun to watch other people make high IQ plays in the game.
If these recordings are updated now. It’s looking at the levels of the players themselves that you were fighting against new players. Throw them out now.
Nothing big. You just killed *bots.
You don’t even know how much it pains us beaters to kill them. We have no fun with it.
*Bots - New players with absolutely no idea what to do.
*Beater - Close Beta Tester. Even though we share on YT and Forum channels how to play properly and enjoy the game, we are considered hmmm… cheaters for having some hidden buffs.
Lol the PC players always make excuses from their pedestals.
Doesn’t matter what it is. If it’s a Console Player who is challenging a PC player, then there’s always an excuse.
“Yeah he might be on PC. But he’s new”
Okay. Let’s go with that logic.
Then the SAME principle applies to console players.
Stop bitching about console players, when both sides suffer equal incompetency.
Just saying.
And yes, when it’s a match full of bots and new players, it’s typically a slaughter for the veterans. It’s super boring, and cannot be fun for people who are just starting to play this game (they can’t compete vs high tier equipment and veterans with over 2,000 matches under their belts.)
I don’t sweat in the least. I’ve been playing online WW2 games since the original Battlefield 1942 when it was released in 2002.
It’s child’s play at this point, and is simply a time waster. I don’t give a fuck if I win or lose. I’m only here to have fun, because this is supposedly a casual game. What’s there to sweat about? I just think it’s funny to read people’s posts on this forum, regarding PC players being superior to console players.
Which is not accurate.
The platform a person plays from, does not determine their skillset.
That’s the whole point.
In a game such as Enlisted, a controller has all the buttons that I need. Considering it’s hardly a strategic game (like HLL or Squad, it doesn’t really matter if a person uses a controller or a M&K)
However, for people who have predminately spent their life playing games from a PC, then it’s very understanable that they would hate using a controller as much as they do.
But for some people, who have over 30 years of gaming experience (since the original Sega Genesis, Atari, and Nintendo), then a controller is as comfortable and fluid as a Mouse and Keyboard is.
Some people have experience with both PC and Console, and are superior players compared to those people who have soley played from their PC or Console.
People with this type of adapatation, are the true master race. PC players who can’t use a controller, are nothing more than posers. Because if you swapped positions, and gave a console player a PC (he/she would perform even better).
But if you took away a PC player’s M&K, he would be as bad as an A.I. bot with a controller in his/her hand.
It has nothing to do with number of buttons, but ok
I grew up with consoles actually. But that doesn’t change the fact that controllers are simply worse than K&M.
Coming from someone who has used both, that’s just the facts
Controllers only allow you to use your thumb to make precise movements on a tiny plane of motion, while also having to move to press other buttons.
Meanwhile, on K&M, you have a wide plane of motion to make precise movements and you can use your entire arm, while your other hand (all 5 fingers) can press all the keys you need.
Just because you’re not fluid with a controller, doesn’t mean others are not.
You’re simply sharing your own experience and preference. Which is totally cool.
Controller action.
Controller action. 5 bullets, 5 soldiers down.
Imagine what I’d be doing to players with a M&K.
It wouldn’t even be fair for the kiddies who are still learning the mechanics of the game and the layout of the maps.
With a controller, I sure am giving the PC players a sweaty time. They need all 101 buttons on their keyboard, to keep up.
Just because you are good with a controller, doesn’t mean others are.
You’re simply sharing your own experience and preference. Which is totally cool.
What’s not cool is trying to lie about an actual truth
That’s an opinion.
My argument is that controllers can easily outperform PC players.
It’s a matter of a player’s psychological skillset (ability to survive), and their hand-eye-coordination with the platform they are playing from.
The title of this post is a mockery of all the people who complain that PC players should be able to disable cross-play, soley because they argue that console players don’t know how to play.
My post is a rebuttle to their claim.
If you give a monkey a M&K, he’ll play like a monkey.
If you give a monkey a controller, he’ll still play like a monkey.
It’s a matter of a player’s gaming experience, and psychological knowledge of how to survive and out-wit the enemy players. Who cares if one person has some extra buttons, when they are mentally underperforming someone who is holding a controller.
I’m very aware of the hackers and cheaters who exploit this game from their PC’s.
So when people complain about consoles who have the auto-aim ability, it’s almost a two-way street.
Anybody who has skill, will turn-off the auto-aim tool, and play as the game as it’s intended to be played.
It’s for the new people, who are learning how to play the game.
How else are they going to compete against somebody who has played over 2,000 matches and knows every nook & corner of the maps?
Aim-assist is intended for people who are learning. But unfortunately, people become dependent on it soley for a competitive advantage. It’s like “Hey, there’s an auto aim feature. Why not use it, to boost my kills to help me earn more xp to grind out this LONG campaign.”
Yeah, and I get just as annoyed with incompetent console players, as I do PC players.
From my perspective, I can’t tell the difference between the two when the final scoreboards appear at the end of the match.
There’s just as many PC quitters as there are Console quitters.
There’s just as many PC monkeys, as there are Console monkeys.
The mode in which people are playing the game, is hardly relevant in the context of “one platform being exclusively bad, while the other is exclusively good”.
It’s just not true.
If you have a tournament with hundreds or thousands of people who are playing for money, and you KNOW that 99% of them are playing from a computer with a M&K… why would you bring a controller? If the game is a PC game, why would you expect anyone to use anything different?
Tournaments (especially teams), often require the SAME hardware in order to communicate amongst each other. Why would somebody use different hardware?
What are you even arguing about?
Where have I stated that using a M&K is bad?
It was still a fun match for me.
