Great
Now how about rest of the changes
XA 38 BR change
Meteor turning time change
Ki 61, J2M3, N1K2-J BR and squad change
Type 4 9cm addition to BR 3
And more
Great
Now how about rest of the changes
XA 38 BR change
Meteor turning time change
Ki 61, J2M3, N1K2-J BR and squad change
Type 4 9cm addition to BR 3
And more
Honestly, if you want them to be different enough… these changes here could be a start.
AVT 40 (15 rounds)
AVT 40 (20 rounds)
I mean, this is an idea
But its not always the case
Just like adding weight to a sword doesnt make it easier to use, or potentially more effective
Weapons must be balanced carefully and are precision tools
If this was the case, people would just hang a brick from the end of their rifle to “reduce recoil”
Its not that simple
I can read.
Unless AVT 20 will get the old visual recoil the old AVT 15 had, slightly reduced recoil will play no significant role. AVT 15 is simply going to be outdated.
And by “everyone” you only mean the historical accuracy crowd pretty much. You guys talk about this like it was a unanimous consensus in the community to not want the new PPSh in the tree
More that many did not want this in the tech tree, and many others wanted a 20 round AVT, a lot of people were satisfied this day, I’m sorry you’re not. Switching out a unrequested feature for a highly requested one is a positive.
lot of people were satisfied this day, I’m sorry you’re not.
Not everyone is gonna be happy about it, but we did what was right @OggeKing
I really can’t comprehend how anyone can be excited about powercreep copy paste replacing an unique weapon in TT.
Truly a bad decision tailored to few spammers.
- As much as I hate to say this, but do not include a bayonet for it.
- Having that item changes how to use a weapon at many times.
- Larger magazine capacity versus the ability to do a sprint charge.
Oh god no, we don’t need more bayonet inconsistencies, it’s bad enough as is.
mean, this is an idea
But its not always the case
Just like adding weight to a sword doesnt make it easier to use, or potentially more effective
Weapons must be balanced carefully and are precision tools
If this was the case, people would just hang a brick from the end of their rifle to “reduce recoil”
Its not that simple
Handling and recoil aren’t the same, the brick would worsen the handling but reduce the recoil because that’s how physics works…
This is pretty sick, the soviets needed a new / better select fire rifle because until now it has been mostly best to just run a load of assaulter squads, as that is the strong suit of the Soviets however this meant that most other high tier weapons were disregarded. Adding a 20 round rifle for the soviets will give players more initiative to add more variety to their lineups. Also this isnt really soviet Bias, the soviets needed a slightly better rifle for BR5 and this fulfills that imo
I think the Soviets really needed this weapon, but I can understand the spam issue, it’s worrying.
Oh god no, we don’t need more bayonet inconsistencies, it’s bad enough as is.
Yeah, I know… but unless the basic AVT 40 has the stalingrad stats version, I will also agree that it is redundant if the larger capacity also has a bayonet for it. I want it to have it, all weapons that should use bayonets SHOULD be useable… damn FG 42’s still DON’T… but we got the beretta 1918 working… meh
More that many did not want this in the tech tree, and many others wanted a 20 round AVT, a lot of people were satisfied this day, I’m sorry you’re not. Switching out a unrequested feature for a highly requested one is a positive.
And the only metric you have is the forums. Tell me, does the term “loud minority” mean anything to you?
powercreep
Again, how is it powercreep? Or are you saying that 15 vs 20 round mags is balanced compared to 20 vs 20?
According to Axis mains who keep making posts that Soviets need nerfs, while simultaneously blocking this PPSh-41 S from being added
This is an absolute win!
We shoulda just got the PPSh-41 S
Truly a bad decision tailored to few spammers.
We did what was right, Suppressed weapons don’t belong in the TT at all, and should be unique.
And the only metric you have is the forums. Tell me, does the term “loud minority” mean anything to you?
Indeed, most people didn’t care, and as such those people don’t mind either way. Silent majority who don’t speak are silent for a reason.
I am absurdly happy to see the community was listened to here, genuinely thank you for this change.
Suppressed weapons don’t belong in the TT
Based on what? Because you decided so?
Locking unique mechanics behind time limited content or paywall. That’s what you want? Lmao.
thanks to the good honest work of forum users
We did what was right Eva, and I have no regrets about it
We did it boys!
This is the first time in Enlisted’s history that we’ve altered the content of a major update after the Test Server and we couldn’t have done it without you. Thank you for your ongoing support - we’ll see you soon in the Wald!
This is a good habit to take.
Indeed it’s the first time ever, it shows the playerbase words are important to the devs,
Which is really good.