Unless of course THAT direction is one you don’t like…
Diversity
Yes I get that - but it is not something everyone likes or wants.
It should be 80% Defending for Soviets, and 20% Defending Germans
50% / 50% for both sides is very awkward
Okay then why is Berlin Germans only on Defends and US also only on Attack except 1 map 50%?
Dude this is beta
Are you familiar with the concept of a counterattack?
3 Likes
Someone on Reddit mentioned this New Jerusalem Monastery - Wikipedia which is located in Moscow Oblast.
The Autumn phases of the campaign like Mayskiy Forest were Soviets defending as the Soviets were buying time to get their reserves from the Far East to Moscow along with early winter until the Germans were pushed back. Maybe future invasion or assault maps have a Soviet only attacker based on the winter counteroffensive phase of the campaign which would be interesting to see.
That’s very cool, thanks for bringing the link.
I skimmed through the thread, hard to say for sure which way to go. I’m sympathetic to the notion of making that map all-defensive, but if a battle can be found in which the Soviet fought the Germans out of a monastery like the New Jerusalem Monastery then it’s legitimate to allow Soviets to attack the defending Germans there.
Love to see healthy debate and discussion combined with research. If Gaijin pays attention, they can really hone Enlisted to truly be a game that “re-creates the atmosphere of the Second World War and is careful with details.” Also, ‘US_Infantry’ pointed out, they also claim that in Enlisted “The weaponry, soldier’s uniform, appearance and capabilities of the vehicles in the game are in line with historical facts.” Makes me think of that silly pointed-felt-hat that some Russian soldiers wear, and the shiny Soviet star-emblazoned belt buckle. I feel like there’s some false-advertisement at play, at least in some aspects and at this moment. Perhaps in time with further changes, they will adhere more to their claims of historical facts and careful with details.
Considering monastery map Moscow city is hilarious. There are dozens of places like this in Russia. It looks typical, but nothing like Moscow.
Attacking from one direction is not a problem either. It is blitzkrieg, Germans would rather bypass this easily defendable map, after that attack from more perspective direction. So would Soviet during counter-offensive.
Last 10 games excluding conquest the germans have been the attacker. Was actually wondering is the matchmake broken.
It’s been said before in this thread, but I would like to re-iterate:
The Battle of Moscow never reached the city of Moscow proper. There is no map taking place in the city of Moscow, only the outskirts.
1 Like
Only Poles managed to conquer Moscow. But, well, that wasn’t during II World War.
That’s because the battle of Moscow never actually reached Moscow
Of course. It reached a lot of places like Monastery map though.
Poland is so based compared to so many of the other EU nations. Blatantly nationalistic, blatantly Christian… makes me want a pint of Tyskie. They’ve been through the horrors of both Nazism and communism, and earlier they had dealings with hordes of a certain religious sect that attempted to invade central Europe. I think they see the path that political correctness is taking the West and so they resist it, no matter how much pressure the EU might be putting on them. Stay strong, Poland. Poland is Not Yet Lost!
3 Likes
What about the russian counterattack out of moscow to recapture all this suburb stuff?
lol what, germans is the attacker most of the time
Exactly, Germany should be the attacker, not Defender in Cities
Villages is fine, but Cities where Germans is defending makes no sense