Wait, so that was your argument. What did you want to say? That this semblance of a tank is capable of stopping you on the path to victory? Hmm.
How convenient that you are never asking to buff German BR5 weapons. BTW in order to change something you first need to ask devs to buff Soviets.
1 Like
Yes, I agree. However, I have made various proposals to solve this problem.
1 Like
In general I agree. Communists are very strong and they will take over the whole world. I serve the Soviet Union.
The quarry map is just a piece of shit. Let’s agree with that.
1 Like
So now it is in your intrest to discuss with the old HEAT in mind… funny
You did not even ask for my opinion so what do you expect me say?
you are blatantly lying. any of you can go to the Ru forum and look at my suggestions. There are German weapons there too. Moreover, the changes to German weapons that I propose also appeared in this patch.
1 Like
So did you want something from me or not? Be patient, there are many of you and I am alone.
No, not really. I doubt you would want to concede that point so I dont expect anything.
Yes, Fedorov should move to SF line instead of staying at AR line. It’s long overdue to make this change.
Also we should not forget why Panzer III got HEAT to begin with - so it can defend itself against KV1.
I think Panzer IV F1 should simply also get some of those HEAT rounds and everything will be fine - unlike Panzer IIIN it only has 50mm of armor, so it will more or less just as easily die to BR3 tanks, while in return wont dominate BR2 and BR1 targets anymore, which is the reason why it was moved to BR3, its ability to fight back heavier armor was needed tho.
That’s because for whatever reason the Soviets are always eternally weak and always need more and more and more
2 Likes
as you wish.
Yes, yes. Just recently, I played with a team of parrots.
We just built rally points and won. Magic, cheats, Soviet bias. and other excuses parrot.
1 Like
Happens
Okay let me try some more basic logic:
We are talking about T28E vs Panzer IV F1 which means
50mm armor vs 60mm armor
50mm+ penetratio vs 60mm+ penetration
Which so far gives T28E both the advantage in anti armor and protection.
But you should also consider that German BR3 vehicles have also only 50mm of turret armor, while Soviets have KV1 which will be immortal to Panzer IV F1 without HEAT.
I dont know about anti infantry power yet, haven’t made up my mind, extra MG vs faster reload, personally I would root for faster reload but that sounds like a preference thing to me. I especially am dominating with top mounted MGs quite often, one of the reasons why I think Panzer III N was that good…
Also size is an interesting factor - it makes a target easier to spot, but also spreads the crew further apart, effectively increasing its survivability a bit.
I think T28E wasn’t much different to Panzer III N in total power.
1 Like
Your suggestions are full of delusions and ignoring the obvious problems.
Yeah but they also buffed Soviets and Americans for no damn good reason, and there are more guns to balance for Germany they don’t have anything to counter PPS-42/43/Thompson spammers + new Soviet op smg, BR3 smgs are crap unless you have MP-41(r), their BR3 semi autos are all bad with insanely long reload speed, BR5 has no TT drum smg. They have no high damaging rifle like Soviet Fedorov that got buffed for no reason. Their paratroopers squads are subpar and can’t switch their guns.
The T28E is too long and quite cumbersome to move in the map. Its machine - gun bullets are seriously wasted. I think it is still not as versatile as the 3N.
Cheap excuse, nothing more.
I might have dyslexia, but Im still fluent in english and I have received no complaints to date regarding my writing style.
Not unique to you
But there is a huge difference between you and me
I gave a detailed reasoning for each item.
But Darkflow-Gaijin doesn’t care about actual stats of guns, they will move any weapon/vehicle in BR or buff it if enough bots like your post.
3 Likes