The issue of G41’s ammunition replacement has been complained about for a long time. We can choose another solution: weaken the damage of ZH-29 a little and let it appear in BR3.
- Yes
- No
0
voters
5 Likes
There’s no need to nerf the damage.
Damage below 15.3 doesn’t allow you to one-shot players wearing body armor, even at point-blank range.
ZH-29 has high and unpredictable recoil; it doesn’t need any additional nerfs when moving it to BR 3.
6 Likes
The ZH-29 is like the Johnson rifle, but it seems to have a higher rate of fire.
Just because SVT38 is a BR4 rifle in disguise - doesn’t mean all other BR4 semis need to move to BR3.
Just give SVT38 a clip reload to bring it in line with other BR3 semis.
16 Likes
Its reload animation is incorrect - while emptying the magazine, its bolt holds open, but the shooter still opens the already open bolt while reloading. I bet by correcting this its reload speed could be increased by at least half a second alone.
G43 уеs
How about neither. BR3 doesn’t need powercreep. The G41 should have its reload fixed and the SVT-38 clip reload added.
8 Likes
I heard people prefer Zh-29 over G43 before - but personally i think they are quite comparable. Care to elaborate?
ZH-29 is stronger then Gewehr 43
So in that case Gewehr 43 would make more sense
But easiest solution would be: faster reload for Gewehr 41 which the community wanted to have for years!
3 Likes
It does have better damage, but not much more, I doubt that being the only reason why people prefer it.
In general I prefer ZH-29 over the over Gewehr 43.
We were supposed to get a buff to the G41, we were told that we were going to get said buff but not when. That the community was expecting it with the most recent major update, I don’t know what everyone’s obsession with turning all BR IV weapons into BR III ones. Not only are they on completely different playing fields, but that would be poisonous and toxic to BR II so I’m going to say it now absolute hard no all BR IV weapons need to be buffed instead of downtiered.
We just simply need the reload buff that we were promised for the G41, not the damage buff that they gave us instead not that I’m going to argue against it the g41 was exceptionally weak, this just made it better but it’s not where it needs to be. Our issue shouldn’t be downtiering more things, it should be pressuring for the things that we were promised and never received. At the end of the day it’s about holding the developer accountable, like one of our fellow enlisted enthusiasts said. We should be voting and pushing changes with our wallets not our mouths, when they disregard the community that made them what they were and brush aside everything we need to start pushing back. That means restrict the wallet until they start listening, in the event they don’t then the game dies. We shouldn’t be rewarding out of depth communication and consistency with the community, we should be actively enforcing this is what we want. Were nothing more than consumers, we purchase a product expecting the product to work as intended.
To cut this short without spiraling out to the rest of the game under the same logic, it’d be much better to get the g41 buff we were promised and didn’t receive than to downtier even more BR IV rifles. The Allies and the Japanese already lack a BR IV rifle, you’re really going to want to take that from the Soviets (I know it’s coming if this happened, there goes the SVT-40 BR III cries) and the Germans too? Then what’s the point of BR IV? I’m not against fair treatment for every faction, as there’s obvious bias. What I am against is unrealistic “balancing” without looking at the whole picture and causing eventual complete balancing destabilization of the entire game by adjusting and downtiers weapon by weapon. Everybody should be on even playing fields with their own unique things for that faction, we shouldn’t be running a situation where faction X was so underpowered that they got over buffed, and faction Y gets overly nerfed or left behind, All this does is recreate the exact same issue later on by pushing it off. What would be better is a complete balance pass over every single item in the game , and I understand yes that’s going to take a considerable amount of time but it’s required if you want a balanced and fun game that people want to spend money on for years to come .
1 Like
I agree with you about moving 4BR rifles down to 3BR.
That’s right, the zx is much better than the g43
That’s why the terrible one (I’m not kidding) has to leave for 3 br)
To pan the heads doesn’t whine at a strong svt 38)))
The SVT-38 is a BR4 rifle masquerading at BR3. All other 10 round BR3 rifles are fed with clips, the SVT isn’t special so it should to. Or it can move to BR4 with the other mag reload rifles.
2 Likes
Do you have any arguments or do you just want to break the forum rules to get banned?
1 Like
You can always drown for your own And I can disagree with them, which I do. 
1 Like
It’s not keeping a civil discussion to call people clowns when you disagree with them. And per the community guidelines that is a requirement
1 Like
Should the Lee-Enfield then also reload with magazines despite that never being the case historically? It has a detachable magazine after all.
What alternative do you suggest instead of the SVT-38 then?