I know, this might be a pointless “ talk “ to the air.
But I have some serious questions about some rather questionable game life decisions.
As I stated multiple time, I think I do like competitive games. Experience some challenges against real players can be satisfy sometimes. But in enlisted, it’s totally another story.
It just remind me how unfortunately boring and limited this game can be.
And I’ll start by saying that I’m reaching the 100th place. So I’m not that bad in this event, but there are many, many issues.
You see, usually, in other competitive games, things works differently.
Take in consideration siege, valorant, overwatch, cs go, they all have somewhat a linear “system” based on having roughly a similar equipment, and outplay your opponents. But above all, there’s usually a matchmaker based on skills.
Nothing of what is written above is present in enlisted.
I swear, I’m trying to have fun, but it’s just abnoxious. I flailed to see who should be interested ( or also called the target of audience ) about this competitive system.
Because enlisted due to its nature, it is, and will remain an arcade and casual game.
For my experience, it has become a contest on who uses the assaulters more, build rally points and rushes the point first. Doing the same thing over and over.
It’s just… Sad…
Worst part is, majority of The matches are being won by the Germans because we get putted against soviets that are not at the same level of skills and equipment.
It’s just a steamroll. My average match length has become of 7 minutes with 54 kills.
On the other hand, if you play Russians, you will face more stronger foes just cluttered by Germans.
I wouldn’t say that this is rigged, but I can definitely assure that I don’t get the fact either of releasing an event in a campaign that basically only “ premium “ users who bought the pac even can be barely interested in.
Because free to play users, there are, but not many, and I don’t blain them.
Also, only 4/5 maps that objects most of the time are shared because it’s only technically one “big” map?
So, to rap this thing up, is this a failed attempt to bring free to player on?
Is this just a saddistic show to see who uses the most gun meta in those matches? Supposed to be a gun run ?
Like, in my personal opinion rewards aren’t that great either. But that’s more of a personal opinion. But what I see and understand, is that this whole event just bring out the worst of people. Just watching people screaming at each other because something does not go right so they start to insult each other. It’s honestly buffling.
I hope there are reasons on why those needless events exist in the first place.
I really hope it’s to somewhat gather data’s and stuff on something, but it’s just like a Wellington meat more raw than medium.
( by the way the score board system still doesn’t refresh properly… )
Same event as last time, same half backed stuff, still Same issues.
I can have the patience of this world, but I still don’t understand.
Oh well, but what do I know.
The point that I wanted to make is, I believe in enlisted. Otherwise I would have supported it up to this moment, and stacked long for 2 years on it.
But I don’t think it’s a wise idea to diverge resources and put focus on those competitive events when the game or self, it ain’t even polished.
Quite frankly, it is a bit alarming that in a beta we still focus in competitive Events instead of polishing the game.
Add shovels to all campaigns, movable at, and all the on going list of features announced and somewhat finished or not for some campaign but not available in the entire game.
