Events doesn’t make sense,
And cheating is with all those events i can tell i play them.
And sure , like i do not care that you do not care, but i never did say i care about hypocrites, only pointed it out since they have never a good argument or explanation about those events and why they complain about it.
its the same as modern assault or unknown wars or what ever the event they bring on.
some people want them, only play them and crave for the next one.
i dont like them. but neither i go my way to bash them for the ones that want that experience.
i dont care much about the reasons why events like unknown wars should or shouldnt exist, if theres a playerbase playing them and wanting them, there is a market, and if they improve them as they go, i dont care if they are “bad” right now, baby steps.
but imo leaderbord events, they are here mostly for player engagement on said events, data to improve them for the next one and the next after it. to fill some old requests of “can we have competitive matches”, to fill our “future” profiles with more acchivements, to actually have (hopefully one day ) a good competitive system. and so on…
i still like them, i enjoy them alot, mainly for the reason i like to always have a good placement on them, to be better. and imo, they should keep doing them, and improve them as the game dev. goes
baby steps.
there is space for every type of event, reward, game mode or what ever to fill every single possible wish.
i respect players that enjoyed modern event and unknown wars for example and their need to have more, please, can we the ones that want some leaderbord events have them too?
i mean, it does change nothing for the normal queue, it doesnt change none of the matches if you play the game as is , whats the big deal?
they are good right now? No.
have they improved since first try in tunisia? alot
Still need to improve ? ALOT
Will be there one day ? Dont know but hopefully yes.
will they afect the gameplay for the ones that dont like them? not at all. they can simply avoid them and keep playing as is. like i/others did on modern/unknown wars after few matches.
is there playerbase for them ? yes.
so why shouldnt they exist?
“because enlisted is a casual game etc etc?”
if one day it does work, somehow , enlisted looses nothing as a game.
only wins.
casual players can keep playing normal matches, and players that want to fight for a position on a leaderbord/rank/reward, can still do it and doesnt afect none. the game only gains a extra selling point.
if, it works by then.
. baby steps.
the game was arguably way worst 2 years ago on first alpha . it already come along way. i can play as many as they bring and let them fix them and improve them for a better one tomorow.
i can read it multiple ways, but i find it “your way of play works in this event/game” the best way to describe your sentence. not sure what you want to point out with that.
but i understand its more imersive to play with bolt actions as if it was a true ww2 batle… sadly isnt something i care to do when i play enlisted.
welll…
i don’t know how you can compare the modern or unknown wars events to this one.
because the previous non classified events are something somewhat neat that adds something different.
and both of them were not rigged.
( unlike the comp ones ).
because they gaved you equipment and everyone had roughly the same stuff.
actual unique content.
competitive events mostly relays on YOUR equipment.
therefore making unfunctionals and not so very balanced matches.
are also those events really needed?
dunno.
i think they have served their purpose.
gather feedbacks while give some hints.
unlike the competitive ones where it creates more toxity, and unfairness.
i somewhat get your point. but i don’t think competitive events and random events can be compared.
right.
can’t say much here as it is true.
but somewhat makes me wonder at the same time why.
devs were the first ones not including esports and competitive stuff because it wasn’t a priority then, i don’t see why it should be know.
and i quote:
you came with this " baby steps " alot.
and also here, i can’t say much beside…
why not taking those small steps back, and put them in more needed fixes?
just to name a few, vehicles to begin with. mostly airplanes and tanks.
where damage is far from being ideal. AI pathfinding, Soldiers stuck in the floors etc.
missing features for others campaign or missing features to begin with.
such as shovels for all campaigns, movable at for all campaign, but where is the third AI command stance promised ( Blog development N_1 )?
and the list could go on and on.
fine i guess.
( even though this game was not supposed to ).
but are you planning to make comps on a buggy game?
i wonder why mgs were rare on stalingrad during the comp event.
oh yeah, bipods were fucked.
yeah. sucks to be you getting your lovely placement screwed up by console players that they can disable the cross play off and others using exploits with medics.
maybe, we can make use of:
and literally not start an competitive event when every time a campaing has just been released.
so we can polish the campaigns and have a stable ground for an event.
is it asking too much?
this, makes me believe more that you do stuff for your own pleasure instead of actually make everyone happy and have a game more stabilized.
having scorebords or leaderbords literally helps no one.
does not contribute the game to improve or help it in any way.
i’m sure we all have our trinkets to look after. but i don’t think the beta it’s the time for it.
well it does.
drives away people from the normal matches, and in stalingrad and tunisia case, they both end up with having one faction bigger than the other. and it creates unbalances.
so for experience speaking, it does.
well, if random dudes were saying that, i wouldn’t have minded.
but devs first said that.
we can’t even account them for their own words?
what’s next ?
excusing such behavior in companies leads to no good paths.
sorry, but i failed to see how it will bring more people.
because, sure, there are people that love competity stuff. but it’s better if gets mitigated in casual matches. avoiding to split the playerbase.
because despite devs them selves say that enlisted has a huge playerbase, i find that hard to believe and we both know it.
so, competitive events?
maybe?
but definitely not now. not with the current state of the game, and even less with “small” playerbase.
perhaps i could have explained better.
no insults intended of course.
what i meant is, you playing competitive or random matches makes no difference.
because your play style doesn’t change much between the twos.
and you have no " guilt / fault " for that.
i agree, i dont know why its like this in literaly every game dev ever…
didnt suck, . got a nice and fair placement overall for the total matches/days i played. i just played fully 4 days tbh. then i didnt had time to even boot the game 
so was more than good to end 20
just to point out, besides everything you said.
they didnt need to disable cross play. were diferent servers for the same leaderbord.
xbox and ps users played against xbox and ps users and PC players against pc players.
the only way to play on same lobbys were to queue with a console player as a pc user or vice versa.
we pointed that out on feedback that isnt a proper move to do for future ones.
i play for me, my own fun.
i give feedback for the greater good of the game, for everyone. do we agree with every feedback or wish everyplayer type? no.
the number of “bad/new/goofing around” players everymatch keeps suprising me.
game is way bigger than what most of forum users “suspect” it is. the average skill level its just too low judging by most of active player base.
theres always players avaiable , the issue lays on the matchmaker (lack of it/player destribution per match at same time etc etc) and players that leave after the first min.