Ok checked
They have a lead indicator
But generally they aren’t really able to aim up too much since it would cause clipping issues
No
If they don’t at least double the size of the aperture sight on the .303 Lewis, I think this weapon could compete for the worst machine‑gun at BR 3.
oh yes, just literally stripped out from a vehicle without modification ^^
Don’t they always
Everything but the premium plane is welcomed, I mean the old P39a is BRIV is it any better, I would imagine Q is better as later model ( not under same quality constraints as Germany was)
It reminds me of the Hellcat, Zero Firebomb premiums and base aircraft which I bought just before their release, I have the other P39 it is in one of my BR 4 presets, why would I want another?
Hopefully this doesn’t eradicate player demand for Rider II class and vehicles.
Hopefully BR re-balances and 109F4 gets a bomb(s) too.
Nothing to say about lewis I don’t really have soldiers to put another Lewis on, but maybe some do?
Keep up good work all the same ![]()
Does it really matter tbh? The jeep came with its own squad and share the lineup limit with motorcycle anyway.
You are talking about the P-63 which is a direct successor of the P-39. Better performance, though one might wonder why this plane is still BR4.
This new premium is however a copy of the event plane that we just got, but for the soviet.
not for me, and you are the moron here

I wasn’t even involved, but now I don’t feel like doing so…
I’m sure you’ve never heard someone ask for “a ride”…? I doubt they were asking about someone’s horse…
Ever heard of a “ride-along”…? I’d recomend doing that with police, it’s very interesting to get to see that line of work in person.
I’m sure you’ve never used the words “mount” or “dismount” when in relation to infantry or crew getting in and out of their vehicles, either…
Actually, most militaries considered (and still considers) the tank to be the spiritual (and often literal) successors to cavalry formations of old. The British in perticular during WW2 used a very equestrian-heavy vocabulary. If your tank got destroyed, you were “dehorsed”, and you had to return to logistics to be “rehorsed” again. When you got out of said logistics center, you were more than likely “riding” that new tank (which you of course would needed to mount in the first place). Heck, the armoured formations equivelant to a “platoon” was “troop”, as in the same as “cavalry troop”, and their equivelant to a “company” was a “squadron” (another cavalry term) - tanks were cavalry, the tank was the crew’s steed (also a term they used).
And lets not get into the discussion about Fighter Aces being considered modern knights…
I guess all vehicle classes and squads should be called Riders, then…?
Well he has a lot to learn should start by learning all Shao Khan taunts if he wants to challange me as the main villain in this forum ![]()

-Emperor Yoshiro… probably.
and in my opinion it’s too weak for br2 3 man squad without any special ability and car without any armor , basically 1 lmg or smg spray and you are gone, grenade box is helpful but not for br2
Yes that’s true this forum is full of low class cheap cartoony villains in the past the villains of this forum had a class not like now…
yes, sir, thanks for the class lesson
I don’t actually care enough about the topic to argue the merits, I am just alergic to bad/faulty arguments. ![]()
I would have prefered jeep-like vehicles existed as “Rider II” squads - but I am way more concerned about how they function and what they do than what we end up calling them (they’ll still be Rider IIs in my heart).
if it’s true it’ useless, worse than basic apc , apc has more crew and it’s rally point , who will take this garbage
lower br and it might have chance , against lmg and smg you have no chances , with 3 crew members good luck , and it’ll be better if it shares with motorbike class not APC