Us armor is over tiered

i am talking to multiple people thats about the stug 3 f

the m18 is great at br3 the m36 at br4 is tolerable but the m18 is just sad
no speed is worthless in enlisted
you missed a post i said remove he from the marders and move them to br1 and move the m18 to br2

Compare these two
Captura de pantalla (70)
KwK 40

Captura de pantalla (68)
M1 76mm Gun

Less explosive filler

the 75 has ap only and no mg and no turret if it had better amm o it would be br2
the pz3j has only a 50mm cannon if it had a bigger crew and a 75 cannon so was a pz4 it would be br3

i said it had a br3 gun and armor, as well as a br3 ammo louadout
my point is not that its br 3 its that neither is the m18

but also 10.4mm pen vs 16.4mm pen
one is a cannon the other is a howitzer

I wasn’t talking about weapon or ammo, I said since you think that 50mm are enough for BR III despite the angling, then following your logic those fit as BR III vehicles

The Marder III and Marder III(h) belong to BR II because they horrible armour, no turret and every weapon they could face at their BR can destroy them easily. They have great HE shells and competent main guns (especially the Marder III(h) because it has the long cannon KwK 40 L/48)

You are applying confirmation bias to validate your arguments.

What does penetration even has to do with these weapons? 16mm can’t penetrate anything the M18 could face at BR III

Both guns are cannons, the M1 was adapted from the M1918 AA Cannon, the KwK 40 from the PaK 40 AT cannon

i agree so are you
to you the lack of a turret is a major draw back
but an open toped turret is not

then those stats are impossible a 75mm cannon unable to pen 1 inch of armor would require it to be a pumpkin cannon

the angling is 80 to 100mm effective the same as the lower plate of the sherman 2
and again i was not saying the stug 3f is br3 i am saying neither is the m18

Validation bias from me over what? I showed you armour values, stats from WT wiki, you just keep saying stuff without even sending any proofs that what you’re saying is even true in the game

I just said that the Marder IIIs lack of both turret and roof is a total weakness, that’s why those belong to BR II

But also the M18 has a high velocity cannon designed to destroy other vehicles, the KwK is as well but that’s the standard weapon of BR III German tanks, plus it has less velocity and a more pronounced parabole

If you didn’t noticed, those are HE shells

Mate, what does the StuG have to do with this, were talking about the Marder III lower plate thickness and the M18

made of i assume metal, so again its impossible for any ‘cannon’ not howitzer of ww2 to have less then 25mm of penetration

yes the 76mm can kil anything up to br4
and everything in the game can kill the crew of the m18, and any tank weapon or at weapon can pen the m18

That’s because those have a fuse to trigger the explosive filler depending on the pressure applied to the shell, that’s why an HE shell explodes once it impacts something hard enough

when i first posted that i was not talking to you its not all about you

That’s the whole point of the vehicle, it’s not meant to engage and resist, it’s meant to hit and hide. It has a top speed almost as fast as the Puma: 80km/h, plus it can go backwards fast: 26km/h.

well you decided to answer, I didn’t forced you

which somehow evaporates the shell turning it to smoke, its still a 75mm shell , and that much he is going to pen at least 26mm

The fuse, the fuse. Most of that smoke comes with shrapnel