That presents its own issues and doesn’t address the problem that select fires make weapon specialist useless and limits the amount of meta weapons to just 1 per faction.
wrong some nations had more than 2 options MG42 100, RD-44, Federov Avtomat, Stingers is just the fact that the one more accesible was the SF meta
1 Like
Mg42 100 is not as good as select fires. Stinger is an event weapon and isn’t worth being a mg squad for. Federov wasn’t worth bringing over a rifleman squad ever. Rd44 was the only real exception
very insteresting that it was a soviet weapon HMMMMMMM something feels strange here ehehe
Yeah it’s definitely absurdly strong. Point is tho rd44 is the only non select fire weapon that is worth considering using a different squad besides rifleman.
its worth it is just the fact that with these guns is better to hold angles (but not for long times)
dispite being slow i´ve seen that both has potential (only when on defensive positions)
and well RD44 is a special case as most soviet weapons meh… nothing new to be honest…
1 Like
But yeah point being it’s a boring meta. Even if you isolate br 5 it’s still problematic within it.
Was already a laser beam in comparison to all others. Recoil nerf would of been acceptable on this one alone.
Even though i don’t like you, i agree with you. But jokes on you now about the g43 lmao. Totally a worth while gun to have now
1 Like
SMGs still held their place in game for close engagements and points inside buildings
lol nope. One shot kill is better than 2-4 shot.
And I don’t think this is a console thing as u specifically pointed out close range so recoil shouldn’t be an issue
I’ll be back to this thread once I feel the changes for myself
2 Likes
Oh, poor Russian, perhaps I should pity him, for I know what it feels like.
…huh? The Aim Assist sucks bro.
Like the only advantage you get is with a bolt action but it’s incredibly minor, the mechanic in the game doesn’t work like it still locked in onto dead guys and people you’re not even aiming at the last time I checked, if I ever get to give a fellow console player advice I’d heavily recommend them to turn that off, hadn’t use it since 2022 bc it made a game experience so terrible.
1 Like
Yeah, even though he tried to ban me multiple times for stream sniping and even tried to get my friend banned on a Russian forum just for having “88” in his nickname, I still wouldn’t ban him.
Still.
But a small correction: he’s not Russian - he’s Soviet, like some kind of secret weapon from the late Soviet era.
But yeah.
1 Like
I might be wrong, of course, but I know three people who play more or less at a pro level on console.
@battlemaniac13 romario aquila from LBE @LBE_S-G-44 can correct me i cant find him and @EVA_Berlinoid-psn
So yeah, those “experts” are probably playing with aim assist, because without it I’m not even sure it’s actually doable.
And as far as I know, they were supposed to significantly buff aim assist in Enlisted in the fall. I actually tried plugging in a controller just out of curiosity, but there was no aim assist at all - it felt terrible. At best, you could only really play tanks or fly planes.
1 Like
Lmfao no good console player uses aim assist.
1 Like
Btw mods why aren’t names like this banned?
The Soviets lose more often. The soviets need to improve.
1 Like
Why do people put this number in their nicknames?
2 Likes